Posted on 07/31/2012 7:37:25 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Congratulations to Ted Cruz! This is a victory both for Ted and for the grassroots Tea Party movement. This primary race has always been about the kind of leadership we need in D.C. Our goal is not just about changing the majority in the Senate. It is about the kind of leadership we want. Ted Cruz represents the kind of strong conservative leadership we want in D.C. Go-along to get-along career politicians who hew the path of least resistance are no longer acceptable at a time when our country is drowning in debt and our children's futures are at stake. The message of this race couldn't be clearer for the political establishment: the Tea Party is alive and well and we will not settle for business as usual. Now, it's on to November!
With all due respect, Master Druid, there art mysteries of the universe that remain beyond we mere mortals' ability to grasp. Why, even the Great Cat knowest not the answer to some imponderables, such as this.
Windy
First Order Adherent
Abbey of Trollhenge
Cult of Palin
Hmm, perhaps she should be asked why she, a conservative's conservative, is supporting Romney for the presidency this time around?
I, for one, would be interested in what she would have to say regards that.
As a matter of fact, i wonder who cruz is supporting for the presidency? After all, he too, is a conservative, whose views are well received.
Oh you know it will
And that would doom any third party effort. Take a look at the history of the demise of the Whig party and the rise of the GOP during the 1800s. A third party needs more than just a single candidate (the Libertarians should be able to attest to this)
Any other choice (voting third party or abstaining) is in Obama's favor.
Anyone who doesn't understand this is too stupid to feed themselves unassisted.
See post #28, then you will know who is “confused”...
Read posts #28 and #44...plain and simple.
Pretty much.
Cheney is a “but monkey.” “I like Sarah Palin, but...”
Well we can only hope that they stick to their conservative beliefs. As in not rallying for a liberal as president.
Because that would be a stupid thing to do after everything they campaigned for. Wouldn’t it? I mean what point is there in Rah Rahing all these solid conservative themes, values, issues and philosophy that we know work, only to elect a man against them all?
It would seem like they didn’t believe what they were saying. You know...just like the Dem/Lib politicians. And voters. And I can only hope they are smarter than that.
Palin has been very clear for over a year that she’s in favor of “ABO” - if Romney is the nominee, then it’s consistent for her to support him.
Personally, I continue to disagree, but I have the “luxury” of living in a state (Maryland) that would only have anything resembling a contest in a landslide victory for Romney anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.