Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hemingway's Ghost
The suburbs will skew heavily for Brown..

And which suburbs would those be? Brookline? Newton? Belmont? Cambridge? Arlington? Lexington? Waltham? Wellesley? Needham? Dedham? Quincy?

He may carry Shrewsbury and Bellingham,for example,but I assume you know that more than half the state's population is contained within 128 and we both know what *that's* all about.

The basic difference between Coakley and Warren is that Warren's a better candidate (meaning more effective) and the coattails.

13 posted on 08/02/2012 7:45:12 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Poor Barack.If He's Reelected,Think Of The Mess He'll Inherit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative
I think Warren will win the limo lib suburbs like Swellsley, etc. . . . all the usual candidates. But other than those locked-in blue burbs, Brown will fare well both inside and outside the 128 and 495 belts. That's where he did well in his first election.

Warren's a sh*t candidate. If I were her campaign manager, I'd be cringing at all her negative attributes that have nothing at all to do with her politics. She puts her foot in her mouth every other day, it seems. She's a demonstrable liar who lied in order to get a job . . . and that's not the sort of thing an independent voter is going to dig.

14 posted on 08/02/2012 8:01:37 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson