Posted on 08/02/2012 2:35:48 PM PDT by scottjewell
[OFFICIAL CHARGES OF DISCRIMINATION FILED BY GAY RIGHTS REPRESENTATION AGAINST CHICK FIL A - IL]
The Civil Rights Agenda, a local LGBT rights advocacy group, filed multiple complaints with the Illinois Department of Human Rights Thursday, alleging that the Atlanta-based Chick-fil-A restaurant chain’s “intolerant corporate culture” violates Illinois law and a provision in the state’s Human Rights Act.
“In our current high speed media and social media environment, Chick-fil-A has announced and caused to be published, to hundreds of millions of people, that LGBT people are unacceptable and objectionable,” said Jacob Meister, Governing Board President of TCRA and the attorney who filed the complaint. “They have made it clear the lives of LGBT individuals are unacceptable to them and that same-gender families are unwelcome at Chick-fil-A.”
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagophoenix.com ...
homostapo, plain and simple, so now expressing your opinion when you’re asked brings lawsuits .
HOMOSTAPO, who are full of hatred, bigotry and plain ignorance.
What a queer law suit.
November 6th is going to be a tsunami.
They don't get it that 90% of the population disagrees with them.
so a private company CEO is not allowed to hold CONSERVATIVE political beliefs, support CONSERVATIVE political causes and have CONSERVATIVE political free speech but yet we must pay for and fund public entities like NPR that spew liberal political propaganda?
Yes, agreed. and yeah, go to, with kuddos.
Because this is really patently absurd, in all aspects a FALSE statment:
“They [CFA]have made it clear the lives of LGBT individuals are unacceptable to them and that same-gender families are unwelcome at Chick-fil-A.”
Oh, and Chic-Fil-A? Countersue for defamation. You will win.
Fudge-packers just want us to publicly honor their behavior in front of our kids. That’s a problem.
Pretty much.
We interpret your statement of moral position as an attack on us perverts, so based on that, we are suing you!
Yeah.
That makes total sense. But only if it comes up before an openly gay judge with no instinct for political and employment survival.
This is the thing. OK for corporations to donate to blatantly liberal and postmodern organizations.
NOT acceptable for same to do so to traditional or Christian groups. Becomes an issue of “hate” and “violation of civil and human rights statutes.”
Except the liberals cannot see this.
THEY are morality, and nothing else is morality.
Not shocked. No one is permitted to have different ideals.
will thye go after muslim business and islam or protest a mosque?
Hell no, they;re cowards, this is easy to see even for a blind person, this is about attacking Christianity and the 1st amendment.
All of this because some people, a few of them like to have sex in a very unnatural way and then theyb think they should have special laws just for them and if one stands up and agress with the majority they then start their NAZI tactics, they’re the homostapo and nothing more
Snd them to the Muslim Mosque to demonstrate and file suit....let them find out what muslims do with the gay life style people
“They don’t get it that 90% of the population disagrees with them.”
This is because the MSM has led them into the delusion that THEY are the 99%.
Did a lesbian, gay, bi or tran couple actually enter a Chic Fil A restaurant, try to order something and was refused service? No? Then shadup. Now expressing an opinion is actionable “discrimination”? Words alone fail, so here’s a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2T0qDDo1Dk
Wait... I’m confused.
Didn’t Obama, until his recent epiphany, express the same position - that he believed marriage was between one man and one woman?
Why didn’t they protest or sue him?
Or... did they know he was lying then?
nail on head and everyone on here should read your post.
We said we’ll go along wiht getting rid of the sodomy laws, we put up with getting rid of the mental disease factor we then said OK civil unions, then it was don’t ask, but no it became mariage, and openly serving which goes against their original argument of their rivate business.
Still there are people on here of all places which still state well it;s only marriage but they ignore the teaching it in schools to little kids, NAMBLA, child molestation, etc
Enough is enough, no more openly serving, no more teaching it in schools go bacl to them needing help because they have conducted themselves in a way which show mental problems and baby tantrums.
They can go back to how they like their sex in their unnatural unhealthy way but they keep it in their bedroom, no more dog parks, public bathrooms etc, no more parades and open sex on the street, no more exhibition actions and how thye dress, we have laws for that which need to be enforced.
Oh and I will go to jail before I eevr back down over this now, they have gone too far and to think I couldn’t have cared about them a few years ago.
I agree with you. This is exactly what Obama wanted to happen and unless the political climate changes soon we will see bloodshed in the streets.
said the same on another post if you wish to read it , just above this one, I;ve frigging had it with these people and even people I know who did nto care a year ago have now become pissed off.
That is a very good question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.