Skip to comments.[Breaking]The Civil Rights Agenda files complaints against Chick-fil-A [LGBT Revenge]
Posted on 08/02/2012 2:35:48 PM PDT by scottjewell
click here to read article
I suppose the journalist/reporter from the Chicago Phoenix used his own discretion (for the safety of the Plaintiff?). If you go to the article link, there will be another link saying, “Read Document”: this will take you to a total of 9 pages on this filing by TCRA.
think CFA is the respondent/defendant here. Undisclosed Complainant would be the plaintiff.
“Look at the depth of feeling this issue generates. And then look at all the people who tell you that social conservatism doesn’t matter and is an election liability.”
ABSOLUTELY. Fiscal issues, issues of foreign policy or employment or taxes are important - BUT it is the SOCIAL issues which make us human. They stir our passions as nothing else does. I think both the GOP and the Dems have vastly, disastrously UNDER-estimated the importance of an issue like this. Aug 1 2012 was proof of this.
Oh, yes, I misspoke. Yes, I meant to say CFA is the defendant (whose address and phone # appear on p 1 of the document.) Those represented by TCRA are the plaintiffs. My bad. Sorry.
I will go one further. It's the social issues which make us conservative. Without a social underpinning, we do not always make differentiation between right and wrong. Our conservatism becomes one of convenience.
We know not to spend more than we take in because it's fiscally wrong. We know not to kill the unborn because murder is wrong. We know gay 'marriage' isn't palatable because homosexuality is wrong.
Too many politicians don't differentiate, but rather triangulate. They are a big reason why this country is in the mess it's in now.
You would think they would be happy to have all the beef to themselves !!!!
Chic-Fil-A has neither said nor "caused to be published" any such thing.
If mental deficients could file court charges based on THEIR inferences and delusions, EVERYTHING COULD BE A 'CIVIL RIGHTS' VIOLATION.
I can't get to a Chic-Fil-A restaurant easily, but I am willing to donate the price of one meal a week and the cost of gas it would take to get to the nearest one (40 miles) to aid their legal defense.
Take that, you pervert GLBT freakozoids!
"I hate Gay F'n Illinois Nazi's."
Point well taken; and eloquently stated. Much appreciated.
A fiscal conservative becomes a RINO. The moral compass is not there, which is why so many of them have gone “soft”.
homostapo, plain and simple, so now expressing your opinion when you’re asked brings lawsuits .
HOMOSTAPO, who are full of hatred, bigotry and plain ignorance.
What a queer law suit.
November 6th is going to be a tsunami.
They don't get it that 90% of the population disagrees with them.
so a private company CEO is not allowed to hold CONSERVATIVE political beliefs, support CONSERVATIVE political causes and have CONSERVATIVE political free speech but yet we must pay for and fund public entities like NPR that spew liberal political propaganda?
Yes, agreed. and yeah, go to, with kuddos.
Because this is really patently absurd, in all aspects a FALSE statment:
They [CFA]have made it clear the lives of LGBT individuals are unacceptable to them and that same-gender families are unwelcome at Chick-fil-A.
Oh, and Chic-Fil-A? Countersue for defamation. You will win.
Fudge-packers just want us to publicly honor their behavior in front of our kids. That’s a problem.
We interpret your statement of moral position as an attack on us perverts, so based on that, we are suing you!
That makes total sense. But only if it comes up before an openly gay judge with no instinct for political and employment survival.
This is the thing. OK for corporations to donate to blatantly liberal and postmodern organizations.
NOT acceptable for same to do so to traditional or Christian groups. Becomes an issue of “hate” and “violation of civil and human rights statutes.”
Except the liberals cannot see this.
THEY are morality, and nothing else is morality.
Not shocked. No one is permitted to have different ideals.
will thye go after muslim business and islam or protest a mosque?
Hell no, they;re cowards, this is easy to see even for a blind person, this is about attacking Christianity and the 1st amendment.
All of this because some people, a few of them like to have sex in a very unnatural way and then theyb think they should have special laws just for them and if one stands up and agress with the majority they then start their NAZI tactics, they’re the homostapo and nothing more
Snd them to the Muslim Mosque to demonstrate and file suit....let them find out what muslims do with the gay life style people
“They don’t get it that 90% of the population disagrees with them.”
This is because the MSM has led them into the delusion that THEY are the 99%.
Did a lesbian, gay, bi or tran couple actually enter a Chic Fil A restaurant, try to order something and was refused service? No? Then shadup. Now expressing an opinion is actionable “discrimination”? Words alone fail, so here’s a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2T0qDDo1Dk
Wait... I’m confused.
Didn’t Obama, until his recent epiphany, express the same position - that he believed marriage was between one man and one woman?
Why didn’t they protest or sue him?
Or... did they know he was lying then?
nail on head and everyone on here should read your post.
We said we’ll go along wiht getting rid of the sodomy laws, we put up with getting rid of the mental disease factor we then said OK civil unions, then it was don’t ask, but no it became mariage, and openly serving which goes against their original argument of their rivate business.
Still there are people on here of all places which still state well it;s only marriage but they ignore the teaching it in schools to little kids, NAMBLA, child molestation, etc
Enough is enough, no more openly serving, no more teaching it in schools go bacl to them needing help because they have conducted themselves in a way which show mental problems and baby tantrums.
They can go back to how they like their sex in their unnatural unhealthy way but they keep it in their bedroom, no more dog parks, public bathrooms etc, no more parades and open sex on the street, no more exhibition actions and how thye dress, we have laws for that which need to be enforced.
Oh and I will go to jail before I eevr back down over this now, they have gone too far and to think I couldn’t have cared about them a few years ago.
I agree with you. This is exactly what Obama wanted to happen and unless the political climate changes soon we will see bloodshed in the streets.
said the same on another post if you wish to read it , just above this one, I;ve frigging had it with these people and even people I know who did nto care a year ago have now become pissed off.
That is a very good question.
No no no no no!
You are stumbling right into their trap, and empowering the perverts.
The perverts' hissy fit cannot be based on CFA opposing anything, because they haven't. The owner simply stated what he supports; the restaurants have no opinion. A right every individual still has, in spite of the pink mafia.
HOMOSTAPO, they are.
When they engage in NAZI tactics then they should be called out for it and all of this because where they liek to put it, YUCK
“Oh and I will go to jail before I eevr back down over this now, they have gone too far and to think I couldnt have cared about them a few years ago.”
Exactly. We are all feeling this way.
Plain and simple: We gave them an inch in good faith and they took a mile in bad faith. They pushed and pushed and poked a gentle lion until that lion began to snarl and growl and bite and roar.
I think before long we can sing this song about the LGBTQ Rainbow Agenda:
They’ve come undone
They didn’t know what they were headed for
And when they found what they were headed for
It was too late, too late
I’m stealing the t-shirt saying for my tagline.
Countersuit for 1a free speech rights, harassment, intimidation, religious persecution, slander and libel, and nuisance lawsuit.
Guy never mentioned gays, he was only talking about pro-traditional families. No grounds. Lawsuit tossed.
Besides since when do faggots get to dictate what beliefs a company must have?
Gosh....(rolls eyes) could this possibly get sillier?
Silly faggot, dicks are for chicks....nothing changes that.
“Its just about time for another Christian Crusade, IMHO.”
While your sentiment is good, and I admire your spirit, do you have a stage where troops can muster? Who is your commander? Which company do I report to?
A crusade takes lots of time, planning and troops. Until you conservatives can muster a plan, an objective and field a force, you ain’t going no where.
A good place to start is electing a constitutional sheriff in your county. Do that and work from there.
The correct term is “homosexualists.”
Like Jimmy Carter is a racismist. A racismist calls anyone who doesn’t believe what they do about race, a racist. Extend the concept to anything.
Sue the attorneys personally.
I think I feel like chicken tonite...
Marriage existed before any governments existed. Marriage was a religious practice for hundreds if not thousands of years, before governments got involved and made it a “civil” contract. The big issue was that government did not make a moniker distinction between religious marriage and civil unions, and society thus calls both, “marriage”.
That is why the issue is so polarizing. Traditionalists, see marriage from a religious viewpoint, while the gay community tries to portray it as a civil/legal issue.
From a religious point of view, trying to “force” approval of same sex marriage is the same as “forcing” Jews and Muslims to accept pork as being Kosher or Halal.
Did a lesbian, gay, bi or tran couple actually enter a Chic Fil A restaurant, try to order something and was refused service? No? Then shadup. Now expressing an opinion is actionable discrimination? Words alone fail, so heres a video:
it doesnt matter. They will prevail. We live in a world of thought crimes. Human right commisions are places where thought crimes get prosecuted.
This is all a wedge to attack traditional values.
Think of what happened to Steyn in Canada.
Just want to thank this group of geniuses for adding to the total of conservative Romney detractors who will now hold their noses and vote for him.
Yes, excellent point and duly noted.
It’s going that way, isn’t it?
Were it not for his chicken reaction when challenged by the Massachusetts State Supreme Court, we wouldn't be here right now. His reaction should have been: Well, guess we're out of the marriage business, since the state supreme court has determined that the institution of marriage is inherently discriminatory. Or a simple 'No, we're not changing the law. Put your ruling into effect and see how long it lasts...'
Instead, he caved.
So, no, this really doesn't entice me to vote for the one man who is most responsible for the issue. The one who COULD have taken a stance, and he didn't. One ounce of backbone, and all of this would have gone away. And every day, I watch the utter destruction caused by his cowardliness.
Romney has done more to help the gay crusade than Obama ever will.
It’s AMAZING that a lawyer who could write a sentence so poorly could be admitted to the Illinois Bar!
With that, you have to be the greatest straight man ever.
We’ve got 2 that were not only admitted to the IL bar, they are now potus and first woman. Now THAT is truly amazing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.