Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Exclusive: Political Junkie's Guide To The Elections - Week Ending August 4, 2012
Rasmussen Reports ^ | August 4, 2012 | Political Junkie Too

Posted on 08/04/2012 2:01:51 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too

Previous Editions:

July 21, 2012
Premier - July 4, 2012

I discoverd that the maps and charts did not display last time. This is due to it being hosted by an encrypted storage site. I was using a free anonymous site in 2010, but that site has since shut down. For now, you will have to click on a link to see each chart. I apologize for the inconvenience.

This Editions's Updates:

Here is the latest update of my Rasmussen state-by-state presidential model.

The model begins with the final results of the 2008 election, and updates those results with current Rasmussen state polls as they are published.

Final 2008 Electoral College results were Obama 365, McCain 173. My model begins with Obama 364, McCain 174, due to not handling the few split-win states.

Furthermore, 2010 apportionment favored Republicans, leaving us with a starting point of Obama 358, Romney 180.

Since the last report, Rasmussen published polls in Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, which gives Obama an Electoral College win if the election were held today. Obama has 275 Electoral College votes to Romney's 206, with 57 EV up for grabs. Probabilistically, Romney has a 12.75% chance of winning today.

In Michigan, Romney's result remained the same from the mid-June poll, while Obama lost 2%, leaving the race at a still strong +6 for Obama.

In Missouri, Romney gained 1% from the early June poll, while Obama gained 2%, netting a -2% move for Romney. Missouri remains strong for Romney.

In Nevada, the situation is improving. Romney gained 1% from a May poll, while Obama lost 2%. Romney reduced the gap from -8% to -5%. Nevada moves from Safe Obama to Strong Obama.

In North Carolina, Romney gained 2% from a late-June poll, while Obama polled the same as before. North Carolina moves from Leaning Romney to Strong Romney.

In Wisconsin, a big shift happened. Romney lost 1% from a mid-June poll, while Obama gained a whopping 5%. Wisconsin completely flipped from +3% Romney to +3% Obama, moving the state from Leans Romney to Leans Obama. Another poll after the primary will show whether this was an outlier or a true shift in the state which had remarkably tilted Republican in 2010.

Watch List - R Gain % (R Spread %):

Summary of Electoral College breakdown

Obama - 275 Romney - 206
Safe Strong Leaning Toss-Up Leaning Strong Safe
EV State EV State EV State EV State EV State EV State EV State
55 California 16 Michigan 18 Ohio 9 Colorado 16 Georgia 9 Alabama
7 Connecticut 4 New Hampshire 10 Wisconsin 29 Florida 11 Indiana 3 Alaska
3 District of Columbia 6 Nevada 6 Iowa 10 Missouri 11 Arizona
3 Delaware 20 Pennsylvania 13 Virginia 15 North Carolina 6 Arkansas
4 Hawaii 4 Idaho
20 Illinois 6 Kansas
4 Maine 8 Kentucky
10 Maryland 8 Louisiana
11 Massachusetts 6 Mississippi
10 Minnesota 3 Montana
14 New Jersey 5 Nebraska
5 New Mexico 3 North Dakota
29 New York 7 Oklahoma
7 Oregon 9 South Carolina
4 Rhode Island 3 South Dakota
3 Vermont 11 Tennessee
12 Washington 38 Texas
6 Utah
5 West Virginia
3 Wyoming
201 46 28 57 0 52 154

2008 Final Results

Link to 2008 Final Election Map

Current State Leanings

Link to Current Electoral College Map

Using the most recent Rasmussen polls, the results of 32,000 simulated elections are listed in the table below. The definitions of the columns are:

Week GOP
Electoral
College
P10
GOP
Electoral
College
EV
GOP
Electoral
College
P90
Probability
of 270
2008 Election 180 180 180 0.00%
12-May-12 193 220.73 248 0.16%
19-May-12 197 225.09 248 0.23%
26-May-12 206 232.72 256 1.21%
02-Jun-12 216 242.46 266 4.43%
09-Jun-12 221 247.73 275 14.02%
16-Jun-12 230 257.37 282 28.95%
23-Jun-12 231 257.92 282 30.10%
30-Jun-12 225 254.58 282 24.61%
07-Jul-12 225 254.58 282 24.61%
14-Jul-12 225 254.58 282 24.61%
21-Jul-12 219 248.33 276 16.46%
28-Jul-12 215 244.1 272 11.78%
04-Aug-12 216 245.64 273 12.75%

Link to Probability Chart

State Details

Colorado (9 EV)

Colorado is tied at 45% each. In 2008, Obama won in Colorado over McCain with 53.7% to 44.7%, so Obama lost a 9% lead.

At this time In 2008, Colorado was favoring Obama 43% to 41%. Rasmussen's next Colorado poll was in the last week of July, when Obama pulled ahead 49% to 42%. In mid-September it flipped to McCain 48% to 46%. The end of September had Obama leading 49% to 48%. The first week of October had Obama finally pulling away 51% to 45%. In the week before the election, Obama held his lead 51% to 47%.

Florida (29 EV)

Florida went for Obama in 2008 by 50.9% to 48.1%, making it a close race. I can see why Obama wants to block purging the voter rolls of invalid voters. Rasmussen has polled Florida twice so far, getting the same result of Romney ahead 46% to 45%.

In 2008, McCain was leading for most of the race. In March 08, McCain was up 47%-43%. In April it was 53%-38%. In May it was 50%-40%. Mid-June was 47%-39%, and end-of-June was 48% to 41%. Things changed in the end-of-July poll. Obama took the lead 46%-45%. Ny mid-September,it was back to McCain on top again 51%-46%. At the end of September, the vote evened at 47%, and in early October Obama led 52% to 45%. The last poll had McCain winning 50%-49%.

Georgia (16 EV)

Georgia voted for McCain 52.1%-46.9%. Georgia has not been polled this year.

In early March of 2008, Georgia was for the GOP 53%-40%. The few polls that there were hovered at +/- this same result. It narrowed in the end as the undecided broke for Obama.

Indiana (11 EV)

Indiana was an extremely close race in 2008, voting for Obama by 49.9% to 48.8%. This time around, and end-of-May poll has Romney leading Obama 48%-42%, a comfortable lead.

In 2008, Rasmussen didn't poll Indiana until mid-September, when McCain was ahead 49%-47%. A last poll in November had McCain still leading 49%-46%. Obama turned it around in the last week.

Iowa (6 EV)

Iowa was a solid Obama state, voting 53.9% to 44.4%. In June, Rasmussen's poll found Romney barely ahead 47%-46%.

In 2008, a June poll showed Obama ahead of McCain 45%-38%. The next poll at the end of September still showed Obama leading 51%-43%. One last poll in November had Obama 52%-44%.

Michigan (16 EV)

Michigan is a blue state, voting for Obama 57.3% to 40.9%. A poll in mid-June shows Obama losing 7%, making this race just within the margin of error at 50%-42%. This week's poll has Obama losing 2% more, moving the race to 48%-42% for Obama.

A June 2008 poll had Michigan in a closer race, with Obama leading 45%-42%. A late-July poll widened the lead 47%-39%. A September poll had Michigan at 51%-44%, and a November poll had it 53%-43%.

Missouri (10 EV)

Missouri was a squeaker of a race in 2008, voting for McCain by the slimmest of margins, 49.4% to 49.2%. Currently, a June poll has Romney with a solid lead at 49%-42%. An earlier poll had ROmney leading 48%-45%, so Romney is improving here. This week's poll shows slight gains for both candidates, making the race now 50%-44% for Romney.

At this point in 2008, McCain was ahead in Missouri 47%-42%. By October, Obama pulled ahead 50%-47%. In November, Rasmussen had it tied at 49%.

Montana (3 EV)

Montana was a close race in 2008, with McCain winning by 49.5% to 47.1%. As of May, Romney was leading 51%-44%. By June, Obama's support fell, making the race 51%-42%.

In 2008, Rasmussen had Republicans ahead in April by 48%-43%. By July, that flipped to Democrats ahead 48%-43%. In October it was back to McCain ahead 52%-44%. A final November poll had it for McCain at 50%-46%.

Nevada (6 EV)

Nevada went solidly for Obama in 2008 by 55.2% to 42.7%. An early poll showed the race at 52%-44% for Obama. Nevada is moving in Romney's direction, although it is still strong for Obama. This week's poll has Obama winning in Nevada with 50%-45%.

Nevada was actually leaning Republican for awhile in 2008, with a May poll showing 46%-40%. A June poll narrowed the lead to 45%-42%, and by July it flipped to Obama 42%-40%. In September, it was back to McCain 49%-46%, but in October it was back to Obama 51%-47%. November had Nevada for Obama 50%-46%.

New Hampshire (4 EV)

New Hampshire voted for Obama by 54.1% to 44.5%. A June poll shows that Obama lost 6%, making it a race at 48%-43% for Obama.

in 2008, New Hampshire always preferred Obama by at least 10%.

North Carolina (15 EV)

North Carolina barely voted for Obama 49.7% to 49.4%. A May poll has Romney in the lead 51%-43%. In June,the race was closing a bit, with Romney still leading at 47%-44%. This week's poll gained back some of Romney's loss, currently sitting at 49%-44% for Romney.

In 2008, McCain was in a narrow lead for the summer at 45%-43%. By the end of September, McCain lost his lead to Obama 49%-47%. Rasmussen's last poll had McCain winning 50%-49%.

Ohio (18 EV)

Ohio voted for Obama with 51.4% to 46.8%. An early-season poll had Obama still leading at 46%-42%, with both sides losing support. A June poll has some of the undecideds moving to Romney at 46%-44%, a four-point add for Romney and another two-point loss for Obama. A mid-July poll has Romney slipping and Obama gaining, flipping the lead to Obama 47%-45%.

Ohio was close in 2008 also, with the race polling at 45%-44% for Republicans throughout June. By the end of September, the race was 48%-47% for McCain. Rasmussen's final November poll had it even at 49%.

Pennsylvania (20 EV)

Pennsylvania went for Obama by 54.5% to 44.2%. A May poll shows Obama losing 7%, giving a 47%-41% Obama lead. A mid-July poll show Obama gaining back 1%, but Romney gained 3%, netting an additional 2% loss for Obama.

In 2008, McCain consistently trailed Obama throughout the election 5% or more, with the state finally breaking decidedly for Obama in October.

Virginia (13 EV)

Virginia overwhelingly voted for Obama by 52.6% to 46.3%. An early poll showed Romney leading 45%-44%, and an early June poll shows it tied at 47%, indicating that Obama has lost 5% so far. A mid-July poll gained nothing for Obama, but Romney lost 1% from early June.

A June 2008 poll had the race barely for Obama by 45%-44%. By July it was tied at 44%, and by September Obama pulled ahead 50%-47%. The November poll called it for Obama 51%-47%.

Wisconsin (10 EV)

Wisconsin was solidly Democrat in 2008, voting for Obama 56.2% to 42.3%. In May, this was still true with a poll showing Obama leading 49% to 45%. A mid-June poll showed Romney in the lead 47%-44%, making Wisconsin a 12-point loss for Obama. This week's poll gives up half of those gains, flipping the state back to Obama with 49%-46%.

In 2008, Rasmussen was polling Wisconsin at 45%-43% for Obama throughout June. In July, Obama's lead widened to 50%-39%, and in November it was still 51%-44%.

And in the Senate...

The race for Senate control is still see-sawing. The Republicans gain a state here and lose a state there.

This is the latest run of my Rasmussen state-by-state Senate model.

The model begins with the final results of the last Class 1 election, and I will update those results with current Rasmussen state polls as they are published.

Final 2010 Senate results were Republicans taking 47 seats, and Democrats caucusing 53 seats. My model begins with here.

As of now, the Senate looks to be a 51-49 GOP take-over, with a probability of 75.39%.

Below is the latest round of state polls. The first number is the change in GOP result from the last poll (or seat election if no prior poll), and the second number is the separation from the Democrat candidate's result.

In Indiana, Republican Mourdock held steady from an early June poll, remaining at 42%, while Democrat Donnelly lost 2%, making this race a 42%-40% hold.

In Missouri, the polling tightened a bit as Democrat McCaskill gained 4% over the early June poll, while the leading Republican Steelman lost 2%, making this race a 49%-43% pick-up.

In Pennsylvania, Democrat Casey picked up an additional 1% over Republican Smith, while Republican Smith loses 3% from an early June poll. Pennsylvania moves to a Safe Democrat hold.

In Wisconsin, we see the same extreme flip-flop from the mid-June poll as we are seeing the Presidential race. Republican Thompson fell from 52% to 41%, while Democrat Baldwin gained from 36% to 48%, indicating a Democrat hold. A new poll after the primary will sort this out.

Watch List:

Using the most recent Rasmussen polls, the results of 32,000 simulated elections are listed in the table below. The definitions of the columns are:

Week GOP
Senate
Seats
P10
GOP
Senate
Seats
EV
GOP
Senate
Seats
P90
Probability
of 51
GOP
Gain
2010 Election 47 47 47 0.00% 0
12-May-12 50 51.24 52 77.01% 4
19-May-12 50 51.24 52 77.01% 4
26-May-12 49 50.75 52 58.53% 3
02-Jun-12 49 50.63 52 54.34% 3
09-Jun-12 49 50.37 52 44.50% 3
16-Jun-12 49 50.37 52 44.50% 3
23-Jun-12 49 50.05 52 34.52% 3
30-Jun-12 49 50.05 52 34.52% 3
07-Jul-12 49 50.05 52 34.52% 3
14-Jul-12 51 52.04 54 91.10% 5
21-Jul-12 51 52.19 54 92.42% 5
28-Jul-12 51 52.17 54 92.18% 5
04-Aug-12 50 51.33 53 75.39% 4

Link to Senate Probability Chart

-PJ


TOPICS: FReeper Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/04/2012 2:01:58 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; AEMILIUS PAULUS; Alas Babylon!; AuH2ORepublican; bamagirl1944; BlessedBeGod; ...

Ping.


2 posted on 08/04/2012 2:03:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

after all that, how about just calling it? who wins?


3 posted on 08/04/2012 2:08:58 PM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thank you. I will chew on this for a while, as I always do.


4 posted on 08/04/2012 2:13:41 PM PDT by umgud (No Rats, No Rino's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
So does this mean that to date 0bama is the perceived tastier crap sandwich?
5 posted on 08/04/2012 2:13:41 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

It’s obvious that America is deeply divided. What happens after another generation is indoctrinated in government schools?


6 posted on 08/04/2012 2:15:05 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thank you.


7 posted on 08/04/2012 2:18:20 PM PDT by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Primary 2008 TN went for Huckabee Willard lost McCain won TN in Nov

Primary 2012 TN went for Sanctorum Willard lost ??? will TN win in Nov


8 posted on 08/04/2012 2:18:48 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Wow!! Thanks for the Ping!!!!


9 posted on 08/04/2012 3:19:16 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thanks for this. Regarding Wisconsin, the Walker results would indicate it might be leaning right. I would think that last poll is an outlier.


10 posted on 08/04/2012 3:41:19 PM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Below is a list of competitive or potentially competitive Senate races. With input from several FR political experts, I have ranked the list from most to least likely GOP win. The rankings will change as the election season progresses.

Note the designations of seats that represent GOP Holds and those that represent opportunities for Gains. Democrats currently control 53 seats in the Senate (including two independents who caucus with the Democrats), Republicans 47. If Republicans hold all the seats they have currently, they will need to gain four more seats to have a majority.

We will likely lose ME, so we'll need five gains for a majority. As of 8/4/12, the best opportunities for those gains are in the states of NE, MO, WI, ND, and MT.

Where primaries have not been held, I have listed a few GOP frontrunners, but these are only hypothetical and there can be a surprise as there was in NE where Tea Party favorite Deb Fischer beat the frontrunner. If you have input on frontrunners for pre-primary states, chime in.

Links to GOP primary winners' websites are included so you can learn more about the candidates and donate, if you feel so inclined.

If you're interested in polling on Senate races, check out Real Clear Politics Senate Polls.

It's widely thought that the GOP will keep the House, so besides the battle for the White House, the next focus has to be the Senate.

 

8/1/12 - Race for the U.S. Senate Ranked Roughly From Most to Least Likely GOP Win

State

Republican Candidate Democrat/IND Candidate Hold/Gain
NE* Debra Fischer Bob Kerrey GAIN
IN* Richard Mourdock Joe Donnelly HOLD
AZ* Primary 8/28/12 (Jeff Flake#)   HOLD
MO Primary 8/7/12 (Sarah Steelman#) Claire McCaskill+ GAIN
NV Dean Heller+ Shelley Berkley HOLD
WI* Primary 8/14/12 (Tommy Thompson#)   GAIN
ND* Rick Berg Heidi Heitcamp GAIN
MT Denny Rehberg Jon Tester* GAIN
MA Scott Brown+ Elizabeth Warren HOLD
VA* George Allen Tim Kaine GAIN
OH Josh Mandel Sherrod Brown+ GAIN
FL Primary 8/14/12 (Connie Mack#) Bill Nelson+ GAIN
MI Primary 8/7/12 Debbie Stabenow+ GAIN
NM* Heather Wilson Martin Heinrich GAIN
NJ Joe Kyrillos Bob Menendez+ GAIN
PA Tom Smith Bob Casey+ GAIN
WV John Raese Joe Manchin+ GAIN
HI* Primary 8/11/12 (Linda Lingle#)   GAIN
CT* Primary 8/14/12   GAIN
WA Primary 8/7/12 Maria Cantwell+ GAIN
ME* Charles Summers Angus King (Ind.) HOLD
*Open Seat      +Incumbent      #GOP Frontrunner  

 

11 posted on 08/04/2012 4:14:50 PM PDT by randita (Either the politicians fix our fiscal insanity, or the markets will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
I think it means that, at this point, Romney's passivity towards Obama is showing.

Romney is probably thinking that Obama will turn off voters by himself, and that Romney can ride it out until the convention, and then attack during the debates. I'm afraid that Romney might fall too far behind because he will underestimate the ruthlessness of Obama's team.

Romney needs to make Obama the story now, not let Obama make Romney the story with innuendos, lies, and mis-reporting the news.

-PJ

12 posted on 08/04/2012 4:16:55 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

In summary, according to Rasmussen’s turnout model, Romney has no “leaning” states that he needs to defend. He has to take at least one of the Obama-leaning states plus all of the tossups.

Leaning Obama:
Ohio - 18
Wisconsin - 10

Toss ups:
Colorado - 9
Florida - 29
Iowa - 6
Virginia - 13

The campaign will change a few positions, but the big issue is turnout. Particularly since turnout will decide several competitive Senate races, we need to get every possible conservative voter to the polls. Freepers can make that happen, and we need to do it this year.


13 posted on 08/04/2012 4:59:00 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Let's take a look at the sensitivity of this polling to bias. Note that these next numbers are the absolute win-lose. The main Electoral College breakdown treats the +/- 1% races as Toss-up.

If we take a look at the impact of bias in the polling, a -1% shift in Obama's poll results and a +1% shift in Romney's changes the race from Obama 288, Romney 241, and 9 Toss-up, to Romney 263, Obama 257, and 18 Toss-up. This makes the expected value 270.29 Electoral Votes, and the probability of Romney winning higher, at 50.62%.

If we make the bias an uncertainty with a minimum of no bias, a maximum of 2.5%, and a likely of 1%, then the expected Electoral vote becomes 273.77, and probability of Romney winning becomes 56.36%.

We've seen some outrageous polling in the past week, but Rasmussen has been generally regarded as the most accurate. Still, it's good to see the spread in results based on potential over-estimation of the Democrat vote.

-PJ

14 posted on 08/04/2012 5:06:28 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

"Romney needs to make Obama the story now, not let Obama make Romney the story with innuendos, lies, and mis-reporting the news."

Agree.

And he hasn't done very much to distinguish himself from Obama- it should be easy, really: Obama is the most leftwing president our country has seen in modern times. The whole argument behind Romney being the nominee- to the Establishment at least- was that he would appeal to moderate voters (and that was what Axelrude & Co. feared in him the most).

But if Romney wants to be the guy in the "middle", simple being passive and neutral is not the way to convince most people (if it was, he would be way ahead by now). Instead, he needs to point out how far Obama is trying to push this country to the left with his policies- against its will. If Obama is viewed as the candidate who is way too far to the left (which of course he is), there's only one place for voters to go...

15 posted on 08/04/2012 5:10:52 PM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
See the post after yours for the impacts of shifting the results by 0% to 2.5% towards Romney.

To be precise, Romney has two +1% leaners in Florida and Iowa, which equate to roughly a 60%-40% probability of the leader winning. Obama has Virginia at +1%, too. I'm putting these states into the Toss-up category, although their actual probabilities are used for the expected value calculations.

For comparison, a +2% lead equates to roughly a 70%-30% probability of the leader winning, which is a more likely lean. These also depend on the poll's margin of error for each state.

For my Electoral College Balance chart, if the probability of the leader winning is between 50%-60%, I'm calling it a Toss-up. If it is roughly between 60% and 80%, it's Lean. If it's between 80% and 99%, it's Strong. If it's 100%, it's Safe.

Colorado is the only true Toss-up at a 45% tie.

-PJ

16 posted on 08/04/2012 5:19:18 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Thought you might be interested in this map too.

at the bottom of the post is a link to a zoomable map of the 2010 house election results.

17 posted on 08/04/2012 5:23:55 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.; randita; InterceptPoint
Thanks.

Randita and Interceptpoint did a similar analysis in 2010. I produced charts from their data for them. We didn't have the prestige of Nate Silver at the New York Times, but we tracked pretty closesly with him.

Their website was called Key House Races 2010. Sadly, the hosting site for my maps is no longer available.

-PJ

18 posted on 08/04/2012 5:35:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
I might as well repost here my prediction of what Obama will do to control the momentum against Romney.

The MSM tried to sucker Romney into announcing his VP choice early in order to give Obama new talking points. So far, it didn't work. The sooner that Romney announces, the sooner he will lose control of the news.

Romney will wait until after the Olympics to announce. If he's smart, he'll wait until the convention to announce in order to keep the Democrats from trying to control the messaging from Romney.

Since Democrats have their convention after Republicans, Obama will steal the momentum from Romney by announcing at the convention that he is replacing Biden with someone else.

The MSM will do their part from this point.

One tantalizing tidbit is that Obama has given the Wednesday night VP speech slot to Bill Clinton, not Joe Biden. Reportedly, Clinton will be the one to formally place Obama's name into nomination. Could it also be the plan for Bill to announce that his wife will take Biden's place on the ticket?

-PJ

19 posted on 08/04/2012 5:46:35 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
What happens after another generation is indoctrinated in government schools?

I'm starting to become less concerned about the indoctrination aspect of public schools, and am becoming more concerned about the lack of basic skills being taught in the schools today. It's as if the "3 R's" have been pushed to homework to make room for the alternate lifestyle, anti-religious (except Islam), tree-hugging, no borders, class-envy, self-esteeming indoctrination going on today.

Yes, the schools will produce drones who will pull the lever for Democrats, but what happens when those drones can't make change for a dollar, or can't graduate from college, or can't compete for jobs in the global marketplace?

That's what I fear.

-PJ

20 posted on 08/04/2012 6:06:52 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randita; Political Junkie Too; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; Sun; ...

My current ranking

1)NE
2)AZ
3)IN (new Ras poll has Mourdock up only 42-40 but I’m not worried, the high undecideds must be largley Lugar supporters who won’t break for the democrat as Osama loses the state)
4)MO (Claire looks like toast, this race could move up the list)
5)ND
6)NV (Heller is not in real jeopardy)
7)MT
8)WI ( GOP primary seems to be helping El Lesbo)
9)MA
10)VA
11)FL (moved it back ahead of OH)
12)OH
13)NM
14)MI
15)NJ
16)HI (it’s harder to rank these second tier races, NJ is lot less rat than Hawaii put you make a case to reverse them)
17)PA
18)CT
19)ME (polling looks bad, King has 100% name id though, the rat needs some)
20)WA
21)WV (This should way higher but retread Raese doesn’t seem to have a prayer, the few polls have Manchin running like Bob Byrd, WV is going big Nobama or else I’d put MN ahead even though the Paulbot has no chance in MN, such a shame)


21 posted on 08/05/2012 9:21:59 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Impy

if Impy didn’t send me pings, I could say that nobody talks to me.

Oh well, gotta give a talk tomorrow on the Obama Healthcare contraception mandate and gay radical alert. I bet they talk a little, but don’t want no yellin’.


22 posted on 08/06/2012 5:13:14 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and we are still campaigning for local conservatives in central CT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Impy; randita; Political Junkie Too; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; Sun

any ideas on how I can get polling numbers or predictions on CT-5 primary 7 days from now?

Not easy to poll a 4-way light turnout CT primary. Liberal Roraback gotta be in trouble. Bernier running 4th. Any ideas?


23 posted on 08/06/2012 5:22:22 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and we are still campaigning for local conservatives in central CT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

“..who wins?”

Way to soon to tell, but yet interesting to watch for a possible early warning.


24 posted on 08/06/2012 6:09:10 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

OurCampaigns predicts Roraback, but who knows ? I’ve not seen any data.


25 posted on 08/06/2012 7:30:52 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
The best I can do is this site from the New York Times. They are calling the race a toss-up, because the incumbant is leaving the seat to run for Lieberman's vacated Senate seat, and the Democrat replacing him is under a corruption investigation, as if that matters to Democrats.

-PJ

26 posted on 08/06/2012 8:48:18 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

yes, PJ. Toss-up in NOV.
But trying to get primary polling so we can convince 4th place Bernier supporters to throw their support to somebody else vs. Roraback.


27 posted on 08/07/2012 3:52:56 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and we are still campaigning for local conservatives in central CT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
Maybe this site - Connecticut 5th District might be useful to you.
28 posted on 08/07/2012 8:58:30 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Would you like more pings? I don’t think I ping you that much.


29 posted on 08/07/2012 6:24:37 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT; fieldmarshaldj; Political Junkie Too; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; ...

I have not seen a GOP primary poll for this race.

But Bernier has no money, and Wilson-Foley is tied to Rowland so Greenberg seems like the right choice to me if only by default.

Maybe call the campaigns and ask nicely for their internal polling numbers? ;d I’ve got nothing to suggest but simple common sense and reason but that won’t be enough I don’t think. In convincing hard cases not to waste their vote on a guy who will come in last you have your work cut out for you.


30 posted on 08/07/2012 6:36:16 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Ping to bookmark.


31 posted on 08/08/2012 11:19:04 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; AEMILIUS PAULUS; Alas Babylon!; AuH2ORepublican; bamagirl1944; BlessedBeGod; ...
Today's Rasmussen poll in Ohio shows the race is now tied. With the prior poll at -2% for Romney, Ohio's 18 Electoral College votes was being probabilistically split as roughly 12.6 going to Obama and 5.4 going to Romney.

With this new poll, Obama loses 3.6 EVs to Romney, and moves Ohio into the Toss-up column. Ohio started the election season at +4% for Obama, in June moved to +2% for Romney, in July moved to +2% for Obama, and is now moving back towards Romney.

Is this the start of the expected trend?

-PJ

32 posted on 08/14/2012 9:38:33 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thanks for the information on Ohio. What particular demographic puts Ohio “in play?”


33 posted on 08/14/2012 9:45:09 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Let’s pray that it will be!!!!

;-))


34 posted on 08/14/2012 10:28:16 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Below is a list of competitive or potentially competitive Senate races. With input from several FR political experts, I have ranked the list from most to least likely GOP win. The rankings will probably change slightly as the election season progresses.

Note the differentiation between the seats that represent GOP Holds and those that represent opportunities for Gains. Democrats currently control 53 seats in the Senate (including two independents who caucus with the Democrats), Republicans 47. If Republicans hold all the seats they have currently, they will need to gain four more seats to have a majority.

We will likely lose ME, so we'll need five gains for a majority. As of 8/14/12, the best opportunities for those gains are in the states of NE, MO, WI, ND, and MT.

Links to GOP primary winners' websites are included so you can learn more about the candidates and donate, if you feel so inclined.

If you're interested in polling on Senate races, check out Real Clear Politics Senate Polls.

It's widely thought that the GOP will keep the House, so besides the battle for the White House, the next focus has to be the Senate.

Florida, Wisconsin and Connecticut have their primaries today, so by this evening, we'll know who the candidates will be in those states.

 

8/14/12 - Race for the U.S. Senate Ranked Roughly From Most to Least Likely GOP Win

State

Republican Candidate Democrat/IND Candidate Hold OR Gain
NE* Debra Fischer Bob Kerrey GAIN
AZ* Primary 8/28/12   HOLD
IN* Richard Mourdock Joe Donnelly HOLD
MO Todd Akin Claire McCaskill+ GAIN
WI* Primary 8/14/12   GAIN
NV Dean Heller+ Shelley Berkley HOLD
ND* Rick Berg Heidi Heitcamp GAIN
MT Denny Rehberg Jon Tester* GAIN
MA Scott Brown+ Elizabeth Warren HOLD
VA* George Allen Tim Kaine GAIN
OH Josh Mandel Sherrod Brown+ GAIN
FL Primary 8/14/12 Bill Nelson+ GAIN
MI Pete Hoekstra Debbie Stabenow+ GAIN
NM* Heather Wilson Martin Heinrich GAIN
NJ Joe Kyrillos Bob Menendez+ GAIN
PA Tom Smith Bob Casey+ GAIN
WV John Raese Joe Manchin+ GAIN
HI* Linda Lingle Mazie Hirono GAIN
CT* Primary 8/14/12   GAIN
ME* Charles Summers Angus King (Ind.) HOLD
WA Michael Baumgartner Maria Cantwell+ GAIN
*Open Seat      +Incumbent      #GOP Frontrunner  

 

35 posted on 08/14/2012 10:48:14 AM PDT by randita (Paul Ryan is "Mr. Smith goes to Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too; randita; Impy; InterceptPoint; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; ml/nj; ...
I like Rasmussen as a pollster and he is generally more accurate than others because he does likely voters and generally comes up with a sample whose party identification percentages are closer to the anticipated electorate in November.

But you neglect two factors in your extensive analysis. (1) Those who tell Ras (or, more precisely, his robo-call apparatus) that they are undecided are much more likely to vote Romney than Obama come November, because merely saying you're undecided is actually a vote against re-electing the incumbent. Thus the axiom that undecideds generally break against the incumbent in any race, especially this one where the incumbent is very well known and consistently has job approval or favorability ratings in the 40s. (2) The same goes for those who say they favor a third party candidate, many of whom say that out of annoyance with the robo-call poll. Third party candidate support almost always tails off as the election approaches, and the majority of their supporters eventually go with one of the major candidates, feeling that they shouldn't "waste" their vote. (Do you really think that third party candidates will get the 6% of the vote in Ohio, for example, that Ras shows today? No way!) These respondents who drift away from their third party candidate as the election approaches also tend to go with the challenger over the incumbent.

Moral of the story: don't read Ras so literally as indicator of the November result. Those "hidden" undecideds and third party candidate supporters will give Romney the extra few points he needs in many of the swing states to achieve a comfortable enough plurality in the popular vote (which he even showing now, nationally, in Ras) and with that an almost inevitable majority in the electoral college - barring an Obama fraud factor to a degree never before seen in a presidential election.

If you don't believe me, ask Dickie Morris. (LOL!)

36 posted on 08/14/2012 3:38:40 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks justiceseeker93. G’night all.


37 posted on 08/14/2012 6:03:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

This is getting dated, but it’s still a good state by state reference. Thank you again.


38 posted on 08/21/2012 3:04:30 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Sorry, did you not get pinged to my update from Sunday?

FR Exclusive: Political Junkie's Guide To The Elections - Week Ending August 11, 2012

-PJ

39 posted on 08/21/2012 3:14:54 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson