Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz: Tea party ‘overwhelmingly’ behind Romney
The Washington Times ^ | August 5, 2012 | Sean Lengell

Posted on 08/05/2012 4:48:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-339 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bit strong of a statement.

More like, strongly opposed to Obama and Romney is potentially a less fetid alternative.


301 posted on 08/06/2012 7:54:09 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

The GOP platform now includes same sex marriage,
______________________________________

Are you sure ???

I have a copy of the survey and its not even mentioned..

Have you seen a copy of the actual GOP platform ???

I know the DNC is going to include a plank for it...


302 posted on 08/06/2012 7:59:55 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Our best case scenario is to end up with Obama back in the whitehouse and republicans in control of both the senate and the house and that is the outcome I am hoping for. Obama is nothing without Harry Reid and Nanci Pelosi to ram his agenda down America’s throat. Furthermore, if we control the house and senate, we can remove Obama from office the way it really ought to be done, via impeachment.

A dream. And a dangerous one, at that.

303 posted on 08/06/2012 8:02:23 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: okie01
A dream. And a dangerous one, at that.

More like a fantasy. That's like some around here saying we'll go ahead and elect Romney and then we can control him after he is in office. Uh huh......

304 posted on 08/06/2012 8:10:28 AM PDT by Ron H. (Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Nickname
so that primary votes don’t get so split

On candidates that were not in it to win but help Mitt to win. They had no qualifications but that didn't stop voters to overlook the ONE that did! And Santorium who is a known 'take it for the team/GOP' was on assignment as guard to interfere to make sure NEWT didn't win. RS attack ads and Mitt's non stop LYING attack ads against a PATRIOT assured him of that. After all, the plan was for Mitt to get the nomination - mitt 'got and took' - HE WON NOTHING!

Voters refused to $upport or vote for Patriot Newt who is a historian first before a politician. His love of America made him study her his whole life. The Constitution runs through his veins. American lost BIG TIME because of immature, naive voters - unaware of tactics being played out by the GOP/Mitt. It was entertainment for some voters while the GOP worked on their plan for YEARS.

305 posted on 08/06/2012 8:15:02 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
The moment they made Romney 'their favorite son' - and their plan was in the works years ago.

I don't read what they write but watch what they do and so far they abandon their own platform. They are following a LIBERAL script with all it's filth.

306 posted on 08/06/2012 8:24:49 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
That's like some around here saying we'll go ahead and elect Romney and then we can control him after he is in office.

The problem with your fantasy (Obama re-elected, GOP Congress) is that, under those circumstances, the economy will not rebound.

You are hoping for gridlock -- which will submit the economy to another four years of uncertainty and stagnation, extending the suffering and making eventual recovery even more difficult.

A GOP victory -- in both the Congress and in the Presidency -- will kick-start a recovery and insure action is taken to return the country to prosperity.

I wouldn't wish another four years of Obama in the White House on anybody -- much less the American people.

307 posted on 08/06/2012 8:26:42 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cruz: Tea party ‘over underwhelmingly’ behind Romney

Fixed it.

308 posted on 08/06/2012 8:27:24 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You're so right. I would be so much better off throwing a protracted hissy fit.

Oh, and my fear isn't logic. Though my ordered priorities are sound. Nice try.

Look again; reread the salient part of my post re mine and intending to keep it. This matters most.

Not tapping out my life story for you but so you understand where I come from. I endured years of building a business. It meant taking all manner of risks, financial and personal safety ventures; mtg my house twice; paid myself only when I could afford the luxury in lieu of compensating those in my employ, two of whom over time saw fit to steal thousands from me; accepted phone calls in the middle of the night, traveling hours for potentially life-sustaining service; barely tolerated and survived crushing state and federal regulatory harassment you could not even imagine; provided gratis products to those without resources and performed routine charitable services throughout my community. But in the end I persevered; it paid off after all.

And now I have people like you who would criticize and laugh at my choice to support someone who stands opposed to a tyrant who'd take away mine that I've worked so hard to attain.

My estimation of someone who'd tacitly allow this because of philosophical quibbles with a political party is proximate to any other complicit party in his totalitarian power grab.

Again, I've studied the numbers and the odd alliance of people in your position with the full-fledged, branded members of the Democrat party, cannot secure Obama The Oppressor's reelection.

That will be all.

309 posted on 08/06/2012 8:47:41 AM PDT by Dysart (You didn't post that. Someone else made that happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
He was impeached. That's the point, and it's a huge one. The Republican Revolution forced Clinton to the right. That's the point, and it's a huge one.

Perhaps Obama would be impeached; perhaps, as you say, Republicans would be too cowardly to proceed. Regardless, an Obama re-elected by a plurality (very likely the most that he could get) would be defensive and weak because it woud become obvious that his support was illusion.

But you are so afraid of a skinny fraud that you're willing to invest all aspects of Republican leadership and power in a politician with a rock-solid RECORD of advancing every single major liberal statist cause that you have, presumably, been voting Republican all these years to oppose. All because you're frightened.

Conservatives like you make me think of a line in "A Few Good Men."

You're such a coward. I can't believe they let you wear a uniform.

310 posted on 08/06/2012 8:54:24 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; presently no screen name

If Mitt embraces homosexual marriage, then so does the Republican Party:

September 3, 2008
A Platform for the Delegates, Not the Candidate

Shortly before he arrived in San Diego in 1996 to accept the Republican presidential nomination, Bob Dole, a plain-speaking man, confessed that he had not read his party’s platform and indeed had no intention of doing so.
http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/a-platform-for-the-delegates-not-the-candidate/


311 posted on 08/06/2012 9:09:34 AM PDT by donna ("...gay couples raising kids. That's the American way..." -Mitt Romney, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: TexanByBirth; All
You consider my posts here, which mostly hold exclusively to the discussion of records, strategy, and the good sense of voting for a plurality, as "attacks" on conservatives?

Lurkers and readers, Romney supporters are required to repeatedly declare, for example, that anyone who refuses to vote for Romney is irrational, crazy, a "nutter." When I and others like me reply by pointing out that the real irrationality, the real "nutter," is in conservatives who plan to vote for a liberal Democrat who is registered as a Republican, they come back and say "You're attacking conservatives because you're saying we're irrational and nutters!"

It is disingenuous and deceitful, exactly the way Romney is deceitful and disingenuous.

The plain truth is that virtually all of the things Romney ABOers accuse us of in attack posts can be turned right around with genuine accuracy, as THEY are the ones on the verge of voting for a liberal, not folks like me. Those same people, like TexbBirth, whine self-righteously that they're being "attacked."

It is TYPICAL of the behavior of Romney supportes we used to see here back in 2007 and '08. Emotional, self-pitying, and deceitful.

312 posted on 08/06/2012 9:17:27 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: okie01

So you really do believe the RINO pipe dream being peddled that Romney can be controlled by conservatives if they only give up their principles, hold their noses real tight and vote for him just because he has an ‘R’ after his name! And yes, gridlock might just be the best that conservatives can hope for in this election.


313 posted on 08/06/2012 9:21:48 AM PDT by Ron H. (Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: WatchOutForSnakes
Tis the season or soon will be (voting) ... it always arrives me hopes ... Good thing it has and does or those types of questions would never be answered.
314 posted on 08/06/2012 9:24:07 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Should it happen ... we will know more than simply the fix is in. The Chick-fil-A protest would be returned with a slap to all the Americans who turned out to say enough, should this happen. It would be suicide for the republicans to put this plank in their platform.
315 posted on 08/06/2012 9:30:02 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
So you really do believe the RINO pipe dream being peddled that Romney can be controlled by conservatives if they only give up their principles,

I didn't say that. Why do you claim that I did?

What I did say is that an Obama re-election, coupled to a GOP Congress, dooms the economy to another four years of stagnation and will make it more difficult to eventually revive.

And that a Romney presidency plus a GOP Congress would result in an immediate economic pulse and a quick recovery.

Do you deny this? And would you prefer the country undergo another four years of economic hardship in order to fulfill your fantasy?

Good Lord...

316 posted on 08/06/2012 9:34:21 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

>>>>> Then man up and declare it for all to see...
“I, __________________, declare that I have decided that conservatism has failed and as such, I will vote for the Republican Mitt Romney, A man whose history I am aware of regarding his liberalism. It is with open eyes and no regrets that I will disavow everything I believe conservative ideals and the American Constitution ever stood for just to get Obama out of office.

Further, by doing so, I accept that I adopted the very things I formerly despised to get a liberal elected President and henceforth I have no legitimate right to ever be trustworthy again - since my newly adopted situational ethics allow me to bend like a twig in the prevailing political winds.

Signed, _____________________________” <<<<

__________________________________________________

Nice try Norma Lenhart... You didn’t answer my question (dodged it).

So I assume the answer is “YES, I, Norma Lenhart, do solemnly swear that I PREFER BARACK OBAMA TO MITT ROMNEY.

In addition, I understand that I’m voting for someone who is consistently EVIL over someone who is simply INCONSISTENT and occasionally liberal. In summary, I’m just stubborn.”


317 posted on 08/06/2012 10:02:27 AM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: okie01

And that a Romney presidency plus a GOP Congress would result in an immediate economic pulse and a quick recovery.
________________________________________________

So whats the magical plan ???

How does Willard propose to do that ???

Eh ???


318 posted on 08/06/2012 10:03:38 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: AlanGreenSpam; Norm Lenhart
AGS, really. Come on. Ummm, well if you don’t vote AGAINST Obummer ...

There's no such thing as voting "against." It's pretend. It's talk. The ACTION and the REALITY is that any and every vote can ONLY be for something, whether it's for a candidate, for a proposition, or for nixing a proposition. The only way you can vote "against" something is to vote FOR something to replace it. And you are advocating replacing a liberal Democrat with another liberal Democrat.

Do you really think Romney is equivalently as ... anti-American as Obummer (or worse)??? Seriously?

Romney is 100% behind allowing declared, open homosexuality in the military, which really means he is 100% for punishing any service members who object to open homosexuality in their midst and all of the emotional romantic conflicts of interest that would ensue. Any enemy of the U.S. military would love to weaken our fighting forces from within by enabling homosexuality and integrated (men and women) fighting forces, as an all-male heterosexual force absolutely would have the advantage in combat. So you're damned right anyone with a lick of sense would perceive Romney as anti-American, especially since not ONE PERSON in Romney's lineage, for as far back as anyone can find it being in America, has ever served in the U.S. military. Romney's family has avoided military service, including his sons, for generations. That's plain WEIRD. I can't think of a single family I know of that's been here for more than two generations, without an uncle, a sibling, a son, a father, a grandpa, who served in some brach of hte U.S. military. But that is Romney and his clan and frankly, that smells anti-American to me.

Romney, in his 2008 CPAC speech, made it clear that he believes our planet is endangered by man-caused climate change, that a "carbon plan" is necessary, and that "any carbon plan has to be worldwide in scope -- let's have a worldwide solution, not an American one" -- those are his exact words from the speech. That means that Romney is all for surrendering American sovereignty with regard to her energy and food production and consumption, to global oversight by a coalition of other nations.

You're DAMNED RIGHT I really think Romney is as anti-American as Obama. You should too.

319 posted on 08/06/2012 10:05:20 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name


"Voters refused to $upport or vote for Patriot Newt who is a historian first before a politician."


Ha Ha Ha, You have got to be kidding...Newt's whole plan, all along, was to usher in Mitt and it worked WONDERFULLY, everyone must agree - Romney's nomination with Newt's FULL ENDORSEMENT don't lie!


Newt, a patriot - OMG, what a laugh. Newt is a big government (One World Government Politician), global warming (pushing the lie), wealth redistribution, anti-Christian (Rockefeller political supporter), draft dodging, federal land grabbing environmentalist, debt ceiling raising, gas rationing, farm subsidizing, Carter supporting, auto bailout voting, HUD programming, adulterous, TARP voting, Tax increasing, Mortgage subsidizing, Fairness Doctrine implementing, population controlling, abortion supporting, NAFTA implementing, New Deal completing, Fine Art Bloc Granting, Mexico bail outing, Roosevelt and Wilson propagandizing, constitution disdaining, Gun Grabbing, ethics violating, ethanol subsidizing, International Monetary Funding, 418 Pelosi Bills co-sponsoring, Universal Heathcare supporting, individual mandate supporting, Cap-n-Trade supporting, Kyoto Treaty supporting, endangered species act supporting, Fannie/Freddie Mac endorsing, green energy subsidizing, religion hopping, "Americanos" illegal immigrant supporting, RomenyCare defending, American Solutions Spam-Scam supporting, Anti-conservative and Paul Ryan bashing, manned mission to Mars and permanent moon base supporting,PROGRESSIVE. And you call THAT patriotism before politics??????????? Wow!!!!


For others interested in the truth:
A chronology of the big-government activities & associations of Mitt Romney & Newt Gingrich



320 posted on 08/06/2012 10:06:16 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

So how do we stop it from happening again?

We knew Mitt was going to run again, but otherwise we didn’t really know who was tossing their hat into the ring until the primaries were practically on top of us. Then it was conservatives in chaos.

We can be certain that the RINOs are already thinking about whose turn it is next.


321 posted on 08/06/2012 10:10:24 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
So whats the magical plan ???

Obviously, you wouldn't understand...

322 posted on 08/06/2012 10:12:15 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Agreed.

Obama’s proven he has no reservations about legislating via executive order, or making appointments as he pleases. And the GOP’s not going to impeach him.

Obama and the democrats know it.


323 posted on 08/06/2012 10:15:35 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
Dave, this is not about rejecting Romney merely because he's off on a few issues. If you're going to vote, you owe it to America to understand that truth.

Please make an honest and candid study of Romney's actual record. If all this was about was "don't have a need to agree with every single position of a candidate," then you'd have a good point. The the acutal reality is that Romney's documented and demonstrated ACTIONS are of a politician who has promoted and advanced every single major liberal agenda over the course of his political career.

There's a really good reason about 300 FReepers reject Romney, and it isn't because they're being purists. It's because they're aware that Romney is a liberal Democrat and has always been a liberal Democrat, and he is registered in the Republican party. When you ask me to vote for Romney, I am informed enough to know that you are asking me to vote for a liberal Democrat. This is not about merely disagreeing with Romney on a few issues. This is about a candidate who is opposed nearly 100 percent to conservatism and has a record to PROVE it.

I'm voting for a plurality.

324 posted on 08/06/2012 10:20:23 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: okie01
So whats the magical plan ???

Obviously, you wouldn't understand


325 posted on 08/06/2012 10:39:01 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Finny; All
Those same people, like TexbBirth, whine self-righteously that they're being "attacked."

Have I once in any of my posts on this thread mentioned my position concerning Mitt Romney? Let me save you the effort of looking, no I haven't. My posts have been about the general manner which people on FR attack those whose opinions they don't like. So you made an assumption and chose to attack me personally as "whiny and self-righteous." You obviously had no clue what I was talking about to the first individual I was posting to.

We get the fact you don't like Mitt Romney. You have made that point over and over again in all your posts. We get it! Please, give it a rest.

This is my last response to you because I'm choosing to move on. So if you want to continue flaming at me and others go ahead. You have already pulled your pants down and showed a whole lot of us your butt. Please post some more pithy comments and prove me right a second time.

Shalom
326 posted on 08/06/2012 11:50:43 AM PDT by TexanByBirth (Free Republic: where they may agree with the message, but they love to shoot the messenger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I didn't say that. Why do you claim that I did?

What I did say is that an Obama re-election, coupled to a GOP Congress, dooms the economy to another four years of stagnation and will make it more difficult to eventually revive.

Well, let's see. If, as a social conservative I was to vote for a person that I believe (in this case I know) to be bad for me and for my country then I'd have to surrender my morally principled stand against that candidate thus abandoning my principles and personal beliefs for the sake of political expediency and that is exactly what you would have us do therefore making us no different than you and your kind. No thank you.

And that a Romney presidency plus a GOP Congress would result in an immediate economic pulse and a quick recovery.

I must disagree with that flawed reasoning. I said that gridlock may be far better than having Mittens in charge of both Houses of Congress. As I recall when we had divided government under Clinton and under previous Administrations Americans fared much better than when either party controlled both institutions in the past, say 100 years or so.

Oh, and if your reasoning was accurate then please pray tell just what is this magical plan for doing just what you claim?! Where can we read it for ourselves or is it just more wishful thinking your part once again?! Yeah, that's just what I thought!

Do you deny this? And would you prefer the country undergo another four years of economic hardship in order to fulfill your fantasy?

Won't be if enough conservatives, and not just RINO Republicans are elected to the Congress. Gee, that isn't really all that hard to figure out.

Good Lord...

I don't want Obama for another four years but with a Obama-lite President like Romney and a Congress filled with boot licking Romney RINO Republicans I feel they would do us all more harm in the long run. This country traditionally has fared better under divided government than with any one party in charge of the whole ball of wax. And I believe that is the way our forefathers envisioned it from the get-go.

So you may as well give up trying to convert me to your way of flawed thinking and reasoning as I'm not the least bit interested in doing things your way. I can think for myself thank you. OBTW, thanks for playing.

327 posted on 08/06/2012 12:12:03 PM PDT by Ron H. (Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: okie01

actually, our chances of taking the senate are probably better than taking the whitehouse which is to say, they are quite good. The Obama train comes to a screeching halt if it happens. As far as impeachment goes, the only thing that has prevented it thus far is Harry Reid. There is no doubt that with a GOP HOR and Senate, investigations into Obama wrong doings will become a priority.


328 posted on 08/06/2012 2:07:57 PM PDT by RC one (this space intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
'Ann Coulter went over to the gay-agenda-pushers long ago. She’s been pushing Mitt because he’ll push the gay agenda too. Coulter is NOT worshiped on FR.'

BLA BLA BLA.... COME back when you've graduated Michigan State Law School on the Law Review and written 8 best sellers...

someone once said:

'ANN COULTER USES WIT AND HYPERBOLE TO MAKE DEVASTATING POINTS WITH WHICH SHT SKEWERS LIBERALS ALONG WITH THEIR LOONY TUNE NOTIONS. ...A WORD TO THE NOT SO WISE....DON'T BLAME ANN WHEN YOU DISCOVER YOU'VE BEEN SLICED AND DICED BECAUSE YOU ARE TOO DIMWITTED TO UNDERSTAND HER POINTS; AND CANT FIGURE WHY YOU END UP ...... LOOKIN LIKE A STOOGE IN CRIMSON WHEN AND IF YOU FINALLY DO FIGURE HER OUT. I HEREBY WISH ALL STOOGES, A VERY GOOD DAY. HEH HEH HEH. ANNIE GET YOUR GUN...AND KEEP ON BLASTN'
329 posted on 08/06/2012 2:57:32 PM PDT by jimsin (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Nickname

True. No the GOP prefers a bottom of the barrel LIBERAL.


330 posted on 08/06/2012 3:11:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: jimsin
Ann Coulter lost all credibility with me. She is a left leaning Republican toad as for as I'm concerned. I wouldn't feel comfortable being in the same room with her! Oh, and Politicalmom is quite right about Coulter and FR. She is no where as welcome as she once was. FR can easily do without her and her queer friends.
331 posted on 08/06/2012 3:39:49 PM PDT by Ron H. (Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

The GOP deliberately chose someone not of their platform - do you know why?

Or is same sex marriage their platform but the deceivers won’t print it. Same like romney’s page - THE LIAR makes himself out to be the saintly one. We know, he’s a godless POS.

So what they ‘claim’ to stand for and ‘truly do’ stand for a miles apart. The GreatOmissionParty. Would you join knowing they prefer liberals over Patriots. They are frauds and guilty of false advertising. Con artists/Rove, et al.


332 posted on 08/06/2012 3:41:23 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Therein is the difference.

I vote against Marxists. I will always do that.

I don’t think I had the opportunity to vote for a true conservative for President in my lifetime.


333 posted on 08/06/2012 5:50:27 PM PDT by sf4dubya (I rebelled against my parents by becoming a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
I said: When some political party has as it's nominee a pro life and marriage candidate, (redundant IMO), we will be joyful.

You highlighted it and replied:You will never see that, again. The left already bowed to evil, now evil has the right! It's over

I have questions. What will I never see again, joy? A pro life nominee from a political party? Why not? Because you say so? It is what I work toward and contribute to. Are telling me those are wasted efforts? I am a 4th degree Knight of Columbus. Explain to me please why I should have no hope. The Our Father is a good prayer to remind us of our humility. His will be done. Not no name's.

I believe you would be a hoot on a Yahoo board. What do you say sport, you ever leave the polite, safe confines of FR? You got the courage to match your convictions? I will pray you don't get banned if you think it will help. When you sign up you should use the name spoon.

334 posted on 08/06/2012 6:50:22 PM PDT by Kudsman (Restore the Republic, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Finny
"Try reading some of the thinking on these threads as to "And do what?" AND TAKE A RISK, that's what. Take a risk that a plurality win for either one would be a GOOD THING in terms of helping conservatives oppose his liberal agenda, whether it was Obama or Romney. "

Lets just say we disagree, completely. I'm not sure how you think Obama winning with a "plurality" is going to even enter into his mind as he plants more commies on the SCOTUS and undermines the constitution at every step. Hell he may even sell out our nuke contingency. The Obama admin is a bunch of lawless commie thugs. Four more years is NOT going to end with a more conservative limited government and that is a 100% certainty.

335 posted on 08/06/2012 10:05:18 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Finny; Norm Lenhart

-——”There’s no such thing as voting “against.” It’s pretend. It’s talk. The ACTION and the REALITY is that any and every vote can ONLY be for something, whether it’s for a candidate, for a proposition, or for nixing a proposition. The only way you can vote “against” something is to vote FOR something to replace it. “
_______________________________

OK, dude, make up your mind:

1. You say there is “no such thing as voting against”

2. Then you say you CAN vote against something if you vote FOR something.

With logic like that, you sound like a liberal.

——”And you are advocating replacing a liberal Democrat with another liberal Democrat.”

That you even think they’re equivalent, is astonishing.

What about Romney’s business experience vs. Obama’s? Obama is a devout evil communist. At least Romney understands capitalism and turned the Olympics from a money pit into a profitable venture by cost-cutting. You should read about that.

OK, go ahead and cite Romney’s STATE-level healthcare plan in a State that has a majority of Democrats/socialists. He will not implement Obamacare or Romneycare at the Federal Level.

________________

——”You’re DAMNED RIGHT I really think Romney is as anti-American as Obama. You should too. “

Granted, Romney’s values are not ideal, but for you to say so shows complete oversight of his business acumen.

For me, business and free enterprise is THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT issue for this country at this point.

What Homos do is secondary. I have little interest in those issues because if we don’t have a functioning economy, we will descend into entitlement chaos and the breakdown of society as we know it.

Wake up! Can’t you see this??

It is IMPERATIVE that we oust Obama’s gang of Marxist thugs.

If you think Romney is equally Marxist and Thuggish as Obama, you’ve been living under a rock.


336 posted on 08/07/2012 1:12:03 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

Romney is an expert at campaigning NOT to win.

Here is an idea that might move him off dead center: I think that Romney should SEAL his Federal and State Tax Records when he announces who his Veep will be.

That would give The Media a double surprise.


337 posted on 08/07/2012 1:30:54 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
The GreatOmissionParty. Would you join knowing they prefer liberals over Patriots.
Switched to unaffiliated after the Bush, no new taxes, pledge. Remained unaffiliated.

do you know why?
The above is perhaps a who, what, and why?

338 posted on 08/13/2012 5:18:28 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: gorush

Stupidity is in the eye of the beholder, stupid!


339 posted on 08/13/2012 5:25:43 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-339 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson