Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

London 2012: Inquiry after unofficial condoms found in Olympic village
The Guardian ^ | 8/7/12

Posted on 08/07/2012 6:45:47 PM PDT by null and void

London 2012 are investigating how a bucket of unofficial condoms found its way into the athletes' village without official consent.

The Australian BMX cyclist Caroline Buchanan tweeted a photograph of the bucket, which featured a sign reading "Kangaroos condoms, for the gland downunder", and a picture of a boxing kangaroo.

"Haha, the rumours are true. Olympic village."

The London Olympic organisers provided 150,000 free condoms in dispensers for the 10,800 athletes at the Games, supplied by Durex which paid for the supply rights.

A Locog spokeswoman said they were trying to find out who distributed the Kangaroo condoms, with the container shown to hold condoms from Durex's rivals Ansell Ltd, an Australian company, and Pasante, a private British firm.

She said athletes and officials were allowed to bring products into the village for their personal use.

"We will look into this and ask that they are not handed out to other athletes because Durex are our supplier," said the spokeswoman.

A spokeswoman for Ansell said her company knew nothing about the issue and it could well be a prank. "We have had no official participation or association with the Olympics at all," she said.

Lawrence Boon, the managing director of Pasante, said his company had no involvement with the distribution of condoms in the athletes' village and he suspected it was a prank by the Australian team.

"We have no association with the Olympics but we did launch a gold condom this year for champions," said Boon. "With such high teenage pregnancy and STD rates, we try to make people carry condoms by making them fun and interesting."

A Durex spokeswoman said the company was "proud to be supplying free condoms for the Olympics Games" but declined to elaborate further.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 2012olympics
The gland downunder...
1 posted on 08/07/2012 6:45:54 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void

What’s the diff between official and unofficial condoms and why would it make any difference? Isn’t bad enough that “official” condoms are given out?


2 posted on 08/07/2012 6:49:54 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will NEVER get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Durex paid for the Olympic endorsement.


3 posted on 08/07/2012 6:51:40 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1295 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Water balloons?


4 posted on 08/07/2012 6:52:28 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Durex condoms, when you only get laid once every four years...


5 posted on 08/07/2012 6:53:43 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1295 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

And they are not supplying enough? Sounds like the Olympic village is nothing but an internationaly sanctioned orgy.


6 posted on 08/07/2012 6:57:24 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will NEVER get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

They only provided 150,000...


7 posted on 08/07/2012 7:05:36 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1295 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

The problem is that someone paid for exclusive rights. Exclusive isn’t an ambiguous term in business.


8 posted on 08/07/2012 7:08:26 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The London Olympic organisers provided 150,000 free condoms in dispensers for the 10,800 athletes at the Games, supplied by Durex which paid for the supply rights.

Geez! Do the math.

9 posted on 08/07/2012 7:10:00 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Kangaroo Condoms have penetrated the Olympic Village security perimeter.


10 posted on 08/07/2012 7:12:15 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“Durex paid for the Olympic endorsement.”

Are you trying to say that Durex got screwed? Oh the irony!


11 posted on 08/07/2012 7:15:30 PM PDT by Batman11 (Obama's poll numbers are so low the Kenyans are claiming he was born in the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Well, you have the quarter-finals, the semi-finals, and then finals. And that doesn't include the group rounds.

-PJ

12 posted on 08/07/2012 7:18:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Oh, and if they're gay, they might need two at a time.

-PJ

13 posted on 08/07/2012 7:19:13 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
You don't know the half of it...

Will you still medal in the morning?

14 posted on 08/07/2012 7:19:34 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

“What’s the diff between official and unofficial condoms and why would it make any difference?”

In the Olympic marketing world, if someone’s using an unapproved condom, the official sponsor is getting screwed.


15 posted on 08/07/2012 7:22:06 PM PDT by Rebelbase (The most transparent administration ever is clear as mud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

And apparently the sponsors are not the only ones getting screwed. Sad to say the least.


16 posted on 08/07/2012 7:24:58 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will NEVER get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
"an internationaly sanctioned orgy"

You got that right! It is more or less exactly that. Complete with all the booze you could possibly want.

17 posted on 08/07/2012 7:29:39 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Complete with all the booze you could possibly want.

And yet the athletes can compete at such a high level? I don't think so.

18 posted on 08/07/2012 7:35:15 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will NEVER get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
Miss Sandra Fluke


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


19 posted on 08/07/2012 7:39:16 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Melas
The problem is that someone paid for exclusive rights. Exclusive isn’t an ambiguous term in business.

Exclusive rights to give away free stuff? How goes that work?

20 posted on 08/07/2012 7:43:15 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Literals will believe anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Like Coke pays to get its product displayed in a movie and some member of the crew leaves a Pepsi can that can be seen in a shot.


21 posted on 08/07/2012 8:03:44 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
"Geez! Do the math."

I did that as soon as I saw the numbers.

Assuming an equal number of males and females and assuming they are all heterosexual (definitely a bad assumption)...

That means they expect each and evrery male to have sex as many as 28 times during the olympics!

~~~~~~~~~

No further comment...

22 posted on 08/07/2012 8:08:42 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The Sodomic GAmes?... maybe the Gamorric Games..
-OR- the Groin Competitions...


23 posted on 08/07/2012 8:33:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Don’t pull a groin muscle...


24 posted on 08/07/2012 8:39:27 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1295 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"With such high teenage pregnancy and STD rates, we try to make people carry condoms by making them fun and interesting."

They can make them as exciting as they want to encourage kids to carry them, but unfortunately too many kids won't bother using them. Otherwise there would be many fewer teenage pregnancies than there are.

25 posted on 08/07/2012 8:44:16 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Funny how after 50 years of the Sexual Revolution, people STILL don’t use condoms, and teens STILL don’t know how to use them properly. The Left’s loony ideas never work.


26 posted on 08/07/2012 9:35:45 PM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
That means they expect each and evrery male to have sex as many as 28 times during the olympics!

This would mean that every female athlete will have to fake an orgasm as many as 28 times during the Olympics.

27 posted on 08/07/2012 10:04:33 PM PDT by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Isabel C.

Judging by your name you would know better than I about that. Or, having limited experience, be more prejudiced on the matter... ‘-)


28 posted on 08/08/2012 12:57:42 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

It’s done all the time. Sponsorship is just a form of advertising. Exclusive rights mean that a company has secured the right to have only its products available for consumption/view.


29 posted on 08/08/2012 5:12:29 AM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson