Skip to comments.To Vet or Not to Vet Huma Abedin
Posted on 08/08/2012 8:32:21 AM PDT by bayouranger
In light of Rabbi David Saperstein's recent condemnation of Michele Bachmann's concerns about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's closest aide, Huma Abedin, it is important to offer proof that Bachmann's concerns both are appropriate and are not emblematic of a witch hunt.
This proof is offered in the very detailed-oriented work of Andrew Bostom. His recent 9,000-word article offers a comprehensive overview of the interlocking ties among Muslim Brotherhood operatives and proves that the Abedin family has very close and personal ties to the Brotherhood. Thus, an investigation that would include "subpoena power and access to classified materials" is very much in order.
Can the "sins" of a father be visited upon a child? This seems to be an implicit question swirling around the controversy. In the case of an individual who will have access to the national security of the United States, it is, indeed, a very salient and critical question. Furthermore, is there proof that Huma herself was involved in any activity associated with the Muslim Brotherhood? Has Huma Abedin ever publicly renounced the Muslim Brotherhood or its aims? Is she prepared to break ties with her very Muslim Brotherhood-connected family members?
Bostom analyzes how for the "past 33 years, Huma Abedin's family has been responsible for the editorial production of a number of journals from the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA)[.]" All members of the Abedin family have been involved in this enterprise. In fact, from 1996 to 2008, Huma was on the editorial board! Recall that since then she has been at the side of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
But who are the individuals connected with the IMMA? Bostom reminds the reader that Dr. Abdullah Omar Nasseef, chairman of the IMMA, is "the President of the Muslim World Congress and the Secretary-General of
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
How did she afford a luxury condo on her pawltry salary? Saudi agent for sure.
I remember the Hiss-y fit the ruling class elite had when one of their own was questioned about his (Alger’s) loyalty.
Another Mata Hari of sorts, given Hillary’s purported proclivities?
That’s because Alger was “A Harvard Man”.
And it IS an industry! If you don't believe that, just look at Congress. Huma is in good company.
“Another Mata Hari of sorts, given Hillarys purported proclivities?”
No matter how sweet, juicy and tasty Huma Abedin’s pu**y may be, it’s hard for me to imagine Hillary betraying America’s interests for it. But I guess you never know—the personal loneliness Hillary may have been feeling and all those hundreds of days traveling internationally while staying in luxury hotels with Huma may have provided too much of a temptation.
If Harry Reid can waste time searching for Mitt’s pet elephant, how can those same people complain about her wanting to vet Huma?
Humas’ in bed with the muzzie brotherhood and Hillary is in bed with ,,,, you guessed it . . . Loose lips sink ships .
Live right now!!!
LIVE NOW On CSPAN: Andy McCarthy on Muslim Brotherhood Influence Operations in the US
Here is a recap of the article:
8/8/12 Former Federal Prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy Briefs on Muslim Brotherhood Influence Operations
I believe a video of the briefing can be found via C-Span.
That’s Eastern time, right?
Also - thanks for the article.
Surely the good Rabbi is aware of the appalling record of persecution of the Jewish peoples in Islamic nations. He must know of the depth of the inner feelings of those, who despise people simply for being jews. I can only repeat the Churchillian phrase concerning appeasement.
"Feeding the crocodile, hoping it will eat you last".
Who is Rabbi David Saperstein? He's the one conducting a "witch hunt", not Michele Bachmann. He's a rabid leftist. I nearly puked when I read his biography on Wikipedia. He's a minion of The Won.
I had accessed old friend Wikipedia on Rabbi David Saperstein. Of course you will probably be aware of this book, but I mention it because it is all fitting together. Ignore it at our own risk (imho).
Radical Islam And The American Left.
David Horowitz (2004)
Horowitz was a real lefty at one time. One jewish chap who is not being fooled here. (chuckle).
Horowitz is the one jewish chap. Am a christian meself.
For the record, I would be a Reform Jew, had they not betrayed their mission for leftist politics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.