Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs Damage Skin? (You bet!)
Scientific American ^ | July 25, 2012

Posted on 08/08/2012 1:48:19 PM PDT by NYer

Compact Fluorescent

SKIN RISK: A new study finds that damaged compact fluorescent lightbulbs can emit harmful ultraviolet light capable of damaging skin cells.

The curlicue compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) oft touted as an Earth-friendly alternative to standard incandescent bulbs may cause skin damage, according to a new study by researchers at Stony Brook University.

The bulbs are already known to pose hazards from using mercury, a toxic element, though in very small quantities, as lighting manufacturers are quick to point out. Regulations in parts of the United States and in the European Union limit mercury to 3.5 milligrams per bulb, with the limit dropping to 2.5 mg next year.

Now researchers have found that ultraviolet radiation seeping through CFLs may damage skin cells. Miriam Rafailovich, a professor of materials science and engineering at Stony Brook, led the research after reading an article in an Israeli newspaper that reported a spike in skin cancer on a communal farm when residents switched to fluorescent bulbs.

"In the past two years some disturbing reports have surfaced mostly in the European Union literature, which indicate that exposure to CFL bulbs might be responsible for exacerbating certain skin conditions, such as photodermatoses and skin cancer in humans," says the paper, published last month in the journal Photochemistry and Photobiology.

The issue comes from how CFLs are designed. Fluorescent lamps, large and compact, work by using electricity to excite mercury vapor inside the bulb. The excited vapor then emits invisible ultraviolet light that is absorbed by the bulb's phosphor coating. In turn, the coating re-emits the energy as visible light.

But researchers found UV light leaks more from CFLs compared to standard fluorescent tubes because the small diameter of the glass coupled with its twists and turns creates more spaces where the phosphor coating chips away, letting more UV light escape.

Past studies indicated that UV emissions from CFLs could harm previously damaged tissue and worsen chronic skin conditions, but researchers were curious about what these lamps do to healthy skin. To find out, the scientists studied two types of skin cells: keratinocytes, which make up 95 percent of the outermost layer of skin, and dermal fibroblasts, which form the connective tissue underneath.

Using CFL bulbs from different manufacturers purchased from retailers on Long Island, the team exposed cultured skin cells in a petri dish to the bulbs mounted in a desk lamp from different distances for varying periods. The team measured how much UV light was emitted and then assessed how the cells responded.

"All of them had some [UV emissions], but some were a lot worse than others," Rafailovich said of the bulbs. She noted that colored fluorescent party bulbs had lower UV emissions because the flexible color coating helped protect the phosphor layer.

Avoid close contact, researchers say
UV light comes in three varieties: UVA, UVB and UVC. The researchers tested the bulbs for UVA and UVC emissions. In skin cells, UVA creates reactive oxygen, which can damage their inner workings, and penetrates further into skin. Outdoors, people are typically exposed to UVA and UVB.

UVC, on the other hand, is usually scattered away by air, so we aren't usually exposed to it in sunlight. However, close to its source, like a CFL, UVC damages DNA.

"We saw significant amounts of UVC [from CFLs], which is not what you see in the atmosphere," said Rafailovich.

Under CFLs, the experiments showed cells stopped growing and changed shape. Dermal fibroblasts suffered worse than keratinocytes, since they are usually not exposed to light. This indicates these bulbs can damage skin in several layers.

Rafailovich explained that at close range, around a foot or so, CFL exposure is "the equivalent of sunbathing at the equator." This may not be cause for alarm for those who have CFLs mounted in ceiling fixtures, but it should be a concern with desk or table lamps. The researchers recommend avoiding CFLs at close range and placing them behind glass barriers or enclosures.

However, there are alternatives in energy-efficient lighting now that LEDs are dropping in price and manufacturers are making more efficient versions of incandescents.

"LED and incandescent light bulbs have no emission in UV range; therefore, they do not pose any risk," said Tatsiana Mironava, one of the report's co-authors and adjunct faculty in the Department of Chemical and Molecular Engineering at Stony Brook, in an email.

Fluorescent bulbs often use less than a quarter of the energy of comparable filament bulbs, making them appealing to consumers who want to lower their energy bills. Though the bulbs have been around since the 1940s, recent price drops, government incentives and legislation phasing out sales of old inefficient lighting have helped CFLs illuminate many more homes and businesses.

The U.S. Department of Energy has strongly advocated CFL use under its Energy Star program, spending $252 million in 2010 to increase CFL adoption.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cfl; environmentalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2012 1:48:23 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
It should come with a warning label:

Use at your own risk!

Another "green energy" bullet for the unsuspecting American.

2 posted on 08/08/2012 1:49:37 PM PDT by NYer (Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers? - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So it’s doubly good for the planet! Environmentally friendly and human-killing, getting rid of all us parasitic vermin. Cool!

3 posted on 08/08/2012 1:51:10 PM PDT by Doctor 2Brains (If the government were Paris Hilton, it could not score a free drink in a bar full of lonely sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is a perfect example of “Good enough for government work”

Take a simple, inexpensive product that works (light bulb), and replace it with a complex, expensive product that is unsafe and ruins the environment (contains toxic mercury) it is supposed to be saving...


4 posted on 08/08/2012 1:55:31 PM PDT by Mr. K ("The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum [of good]")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good thing I just got another five 4 pks of 100 watt incandescent bulbs.

5 posted on 08/08/2012 1:55:52 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I am never that close to a lamp, especially if it’s without a shade. UVB does not go through glass or plastic well, though UVA does so better.

This is a typical hysterical fear report. Not that I use Gorebulbs, I’m mostly using LED and some incan these days.

6 posted on 08/08/2012 1:56:25 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Keep your laws off my light bulbs!

7 posted on 08/08/2012 2:03:11 PM PDT by dnandell (I don't need no stinkin' tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have enough 60w, 75w & 100w bulbs stockpiled to last 20yrs. Screw the greenie crap.

8 posted on 08/08/2012 2:03:44 PM PDT by carriage_hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie and stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

Nothing about these bulbs is good for the environment.

They are loaded with mercury. Just wait will we have a few million pounds of this crap in our land fills seeping mercury into the water table.

Environmentalists don’t give a rats ass about the Earth.

9 posted on 08/08/2012 2:21:36 PM PDT by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If this product had been foisted on the American public by a private company, the liberals would be hanging the manufacturers in the town square. And NOBODY is pointing this out!!!

10 posted on 08/08/2012 2:25:49 PM PDT by Humble Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The sky is falling.

11 posted on 08/08/2012 2:27:39 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
It is only a question of how long it will be before there are ads on TV proclaiming:

If you or a loved one contracted skin cancer while using Compact Fluorescent light bulbs, You may be entitled to compensation!

Contact the firm of ....

Lawyers passing laws for lawyers...

12 posted on 08/08/2012 2:33:55 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Let’s hope your supply is better than my supply. I bought several boxes and most fail within 6 month. I’ve got bulbs manufactured more than 10 years ago still burning bright but if I need to replace it with a new one, it usually fails in a few months. I’ve tried several manufacturers but get similar results.

I wonder at times if this isn’t planned obsolescence. We buy all the old style bulbs we can and they manufacture them with far less reliability. Sooner or later everyone is using CFLs anyway because our supply of old bulbs was designed to fail prematurely.

13 posted on 08/08/2012 2:38:22 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Love it!!! ROFL!!

14 posted on 08/08/2012 3:01:04 PM PDT by NYer (Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers? - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Take a simple, inexpensive product that works (light bulb), and replace it with a complex, expensive product that is unsafe and ruins the environment (contains toxic mercury) it is supposed to be saving...

the reason why so many government programs are worthless is that the government refuses to be guided by the principles of systems

1) the fundamental theorem: new systems generate new problems
2) the generalized uncertainty principle: complicated systems produce unexpected results
3) the total behavior of complicated systems cannot be predicted
4) complicated systems produced by expanding the dimensions of a simpler system does not behave like the simpler system
5) the mode of failure of a complicated system cannot ordinarily be predicted from its structure
6) if a simple system is working, don't change it
7) complicated systems tend to produce complicated responses (not solutions) to problems

15 posted on 08/08/2012 3:19:34 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The entire “Global Warming/Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas” nonsense is proving why Congress should stick to its enumerated powers and stay out da science fiction!

To date, virtually EVERY single “remedy” someone has created to offset or correct something related to the GW hoax/fraud/(insert your own term here) has proven to be worse than the so-called cause.

Now, we are forced, by Congressional decree that killed off the incandescent manufacturing industry in the US, to purchase the CFLs that are more hazardous than the incandescents. While incandescents are an old technology that waste a lot of energy, at least there is little to no fear of them killing or harming either people or the environment!! Unforntuantely, the enviro-nazis can’t say the same about their dangerous “replacements”.

CFLs, bio-fuels, ethanol have proven to be worse (in a variety of ways) than the technologies they are replacing. Meanwhile, giant scientific “brains” like algore are pushing these dangerous technologies based on little more than “chicken-little” science!!

And, the Dems claim that it is Republicans who don’t care about people or the environment!!

Wanna bet??

16 posted on 08/08/2012 3:20:08 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I wonder what those bulbs do to delicate retina of the eye?

17 posted on 08/08/2012 3:30:56 PM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

I try to conserve my incandescent stash by using them in areas I spend most of my time. For example, use CFL’s in exterior lights and some recessed hallway lights. I also use CFL or LED bulbs in items on my generator to conserve fuel. Besides that, I use incandescent bulbs in all table lamps, bathroom fixtures, etc. I just ordered some LED bulbs to try.

18 posted on 08/08/2012 3:58:50 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I highly doubt Algore only uses CFL’s in his mansions. I bet in the private areas he uses incandescent bulbs.

19 posted on 08/08/2012 4:02:59 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

I had the same trouble as you, bulbs bought at Home Depot going out in a very short time prompted me to write things down.

I’ve bought some 100 watts and others over ebay, and I’m very pleased.

Brass bases, sorry, can’t remember who the sellor was, but they were not expensive. I keep records, not elaborate, just a paper with notes of when I replace what.

20 posted on 08/08/2012 4:55:07 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson