Skip to comments.Romney Ad Hits Obama For Use Of Woman’s Death
Posted on 08/10/2012 10:58:11 AM PDT by hcmama
A new ad by the Romney campaign calls into question President Obamas character after a Democratic ad linked a womans death to Romney, and the Obama campaign subsequently reversed itself about being aware of the star of the ad and the womans husband, Joe Soptic.
What does it say about a presidents character when his campaign tries to use the tragedy of a womans death for poliitcal gain, a narrator asks.
Youtube Link: America Deserves Better:
I noticed a comment several comments down the list that said that the video had received 301 views on the counter, and they thought that YouTube was blocking the counter from recording the views. May be something to that, because it said 301 when I got to the page, and still said 301 after I watched the video. I viewed the video several minutes after that 301 number was posted.
The liberals/progressives/socialists/etc ad infinitum sure have a problem with the TRUTH, don’t they?!?
I have to think that some thing in the internal polling by the Obama camp has got them spooked.
This is the kind of stuff the Dems reserve for the last week of the campaign, when there isn’t enough time to refute it.
Even with the help of the MSM, enough of this sicko stuff and everyone but the hard core leftists will begin to stop paying attention to it or taking it at all seriously.
I wish Mittens would hit 0bama as hard as he hit Newt and Rick.
Not yet, it’s a bit early.
” and the Obama campaign subsequently reversed itself about being aware of the star of the ad and the womans husband, Joe Soptic.”
And isn’t Joe Septic wearing the same tank top in both ads?
That may be true. The counter is still at 301 at 3:14 pm and the most recent comment was left 1 minute ago. You say it was 301 at 2:20 pm. The math don’t work.
How strange, it’s still at 301 and should be at the very least 302 since I viewed it. I wonder whats up with that....
Gee whiz. Must be some sort of software glitch.
How could it possibly be anything else?