Posted on 08/10/2012 7:08:35 PM PDT by Albion Wilde
Two hours for a rolling stop? Your own defense of them indicts the cops.
;^)
You obviously didn't read just mouthing off. That makes you null and void.
Seriously lol'd after reading that.
You are a riot - going around commenting w/o reading the posts and telling others what not to believe, yet you believe six cops is OK. You just want to be ornery and add nothing.
Exactly. But either way, until the trial, is over - her life will be closely watched by, at least, all six cops for ‘anything’. They need to make her look less than admirable w/whatever and make it hit the local paper to taint the minds of the future jury. They have the upper hand now. She knows it and that alone is stressful to cause a ‘whoops!’.
Rest assured, I want justice here.
That would not include this woman being treated unfairly.
It wouldn’t include the officers getting off if their guilty either.
Sorry
It wouldn’t include the officers getting off if they’re guilty either.
Exactly. But some are here only to be argumentative.
Right now, the sheriff knows where those cops were at the time and has any back up - he should present it if he has it to prevent a costly trial. I'm sure if the Sheriff had enough 'amno', the lawyer would advise the woman to drop the case, the lawyer wants to get paid plus he does not want to be accused by the judged of taking on a frivolous lawsuit.
The least we have is one overly zealous cop for a rolling stop.. The policeman, the lawsuit says, then pulled her over, approached with his gun drawn and put Tarantino in handcuffs.
You said the dash cams would show who was telling the truth, yet you seem downright incurious about what they show. Care to tell us why?
You didn’t read the story or the lawsuit at the end. It’s a frivolous case in civil court. No problem at all with 6 cops being on the scene
Maybe one day, you’ll learn what you can’t do while handcuffed. Experience is the only way someone as clueless as you learns.
You can’t even read my posts correctly - so don’t tell me what to read or ASS U ME I didn’t.
We don’t have rocket science here, they ‘imagine’ they can do anything while handcuffed.
I don’t have to assume anything about you. You have shown you are an idiot
yet you seem downright incurious about what they show
This is a “CIVIL” suit. If there was a shred of evidence to back up the wild claims of this woman, it would be criminal. This is an old story from over a year ago. If her claims had any merit, the media would have been all over it. This story isn’t a story
Your the @s* and PROVED IT!
Uncool. We need more COPS and less PIGS.
“We need more COPS and less PIGS.”
F**kin’ aye!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.