Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name

Look I agree, but you are jumping to the conclusion that these charges are without a doubt true. Hang in there. If true, these guys are finished as officers, and will get time.


11 posted on 08/10/2012 7:23:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

I know. I believe nothing of what I read and half of what I see. I responded, not believing, to what I read.

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/leila-tarantino.jpeg


18 posted on 08/10/2012 7:29:44 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Update: the police issued the following statement
Ref: Civil action filed on August 3, 2012, by Leila Tarantino, Plaintiff

The Citrus County Sheriff’s Office wants to go on record as saying the allegations made in this lawsuit are not only ludicrous, but completely untrue. Yes, a traffic stop was conducted on July 17, 2011. The plaintiff was issued a criminal citation for violation of restrictions on her driver’s license. She also was issued a written warning for rolling through a stop sign.

No strip search was conducted, and the plaintiff’s tampon was never forcibly removed by any deputy.

It is the Sheriff’s Office intent to aggressively defend itself against these malicious allegations.

Issued 08/10/12


IMO, we can cut to the chase and find out who was the cop who cited her and where were the other 5 cops assigned at that time. The Sheriff should already know that and tell us.


29 posted on 08/10/2012 7:44:06 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson