[fish hawk]

Obama tactics here. When you are shown to be wrong so you can't run on that, hit the opponent with what ever you can come up with to try to make him look stupid. So you attack a typo instead of proving me wrong on the subject. Nice try.

[Carriage Hill]

I'm not attacking a typo, and you are certainly not stupid. I never said or implied that. You did. I'm still just trying to figure out ***what you're saying/asking***, so that I can give you an answer. I can't untangle all the no/not/NOTs... can you re-phrase it?

Post #9 said he's not; I never said it in Post #2. Only that there are so many frauds/fakes out there claiming to be Indian, and he doesn't have any of the physical features, that his claim is suspicious, on the surface.

Has he proved his lineage? I assume that if he's carrying the title "Chief", and others aren't calling him a liar like Churchill and Warren, he's proved it?

Yes?

No?

According to Dingy Harry Reid, it 'might be out there' that he's 'possibly' a fraud, so he needs to prove it.

The burden of proof isn't on me; it's on him.