Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Decision By Netanyahu, Barak To Strike Iran Is Almost Final -- Israel TV
The Times of Israel ^ | August 11, 2012

Posted on 08/11/2012 6:30:11 AM PDT by Fennie

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have "almost finally" decided on an Israeli strike at Iran's nuclear facilities this fall, and a final decision will be taken "soon", Israel's main TV news broadcast reported on Friday evening.

Channel 2 News, the country's leading news program, devoted much of its Friday night broadcast to the issue, detailing the pros and cons that, it said, have taken Netanyahu and Barak to the brink of approving an Israeli military attack despite opposition from the Obama administration and from many Israeli security chiefs.

Critically, the station's diplomatic correspondent Udi Segal said, Israel does not believe that the US will take military action as Iran closes in on the bomb.

The US, the TV report said, has not provided Israel with details of an attack plan. President Obama has not promised to attack Iran if all else fails. Conditions cited by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta for an American attack do not calm Israeli concerns. And Obama has a record of seeking UN and Arab League approval before action. All these factors, in Jerusalem's mind, underline the growing conviction of Netanyahu and Barak that Israel will have to tackle Iran alone, the TV report said.

Israel's leaders have also noted that president George W. Bush vowed repeatedly that North Korea would not be allowed to attain a nuclear weapons capability -- a vow that proved empty.

Obama does not want to intervene militarily before the presidential elections in November, and it is doubtful that he would act afterwards, runs the Israeli assessment, the TV report said. Obama may believe that the US can live with a nuclear Iran, but Israel cannot, the report quoted those in "Netanyahu's circle" as saying.

As for presidential challenger Mitt Romney, he takes a more forceful position, but would probably not have the domestic support necessary to act in the first year of his presidency, if elected, and after that it would be too late.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; netanyahu; nucleariran; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: MasterGunner01
I wonder if Syria and Egypt want a few, or is there some sanity there?

With the successful overthrow of Egypt's Mubarak and the current civil war in Syria, those two substantial opponents of Israel have been temporarily marginalized and do not pose a significant threat or provide a roadblock to Israel's target, Iran. The timing for Israel is indeed favorable.............

21 posted on 08/11/2012 7:51:02 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

>>Furthermore, it would doom Obama’s chances by stripping him of the support of the militant peace movement and possibly the Nobel Peace prize.

I disagree. To the Anti-Israel factions, he will be “attempting to restore order to the region by cleaning up a mess started by the Jewish people occupying Palestine.”

To the Pro-Israel faction, he will be “supporting Israel in a war that has been a long time coming.”

22 posted on 08/11/2012 7:52:10 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

This will be Obama’s excuse to cancel elections.

23 posted on 08/11/2012 7:56:59 AM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Time to inventory your preps and make sure you haven’t forgotten anything.

24 posted on 08/11/2012 7:59:45 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I put no stock in these announcements, whether formal or leaked. They are, themselves, all tactics in the diplomatic contest. War may come. It may come this evening, but the event will have no actual relationship to these things.

25 posted on 08/11/2012 8:20:31 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux

If the kenyan thinks he is going to lose in November then he will lquite possibly go for war against Iran before then. Israel, at this point probably does not want to do it before the election if the Israelis think Romney will win because or the likelihood that war will get the kenyan reelected. Obama has consistently backed and promoted Sunni takeovers of Moslem countries and probably does not want to see Shiite Iran gain hegemony. He may tell Israel to “do it” and Israel may tell him “later.”

26 posted on 08/11/2012 8:26:18 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
must be total BS. Does anyone here believe that Israel would release this information if this were true? Natanyahu is a very smart man so I figure he has a reason to let this get out. I don't know what that reason is but he does. I'm not saying that at some point he wont do it.
27 posted on 08/11/2012 9:06:21 AM PDT by fish hawk (phobos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I don’t care what Israel does, but I don’t want the USA involved in another war in the ME.

We need to get out now and start taking care of the USA and rebuilding our finances and our economy. Can’t do it when we are spending more on war than we make. It wouldn’t bother me if they all go at it, and turn the area into glass. It’s been a costly thorn in our side and that would dis-involve us. We better be prepared for $10 gas.

28 posted on 08/11/2012 11:39:44 AM PDT by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

-—”Make sure Iran knows they’re coming.

Something’s squirrelly.”

Maybe they’re going to use a neutron bomb and Iran doesn’t stand a chance anyway?

29 posted on 08/11/2012 12:16:00 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

To the extent that Iran has any real defensive capability, they have “stuff” but not much depth so far as I can tell and it all depends on Russian support to keep running, the public pronouncements have the interesting effect of rattling the Persian’s cage so to speak. If they don’t get jumpy and move a few things around it means they can’t or don’t actually have anything important. They aren’t smart enough to do fake blocking moves so every thing they move is a give-away.
But I’ve always said the easy way to take them out of nuclear production is to destroy their energy grid which, incidentally, would take the whole bunch back to 1920. Nuclear enrichment takes large qtys or both electricity and water-——blasting either one will have them skipping laundry days for a long time. It’s not exactly necessary to try to hit the best protected facility they have, which is also the most likely place they have air defenses.

30 posted on 08/11/2012 12:58:39 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KenD

Just another one of these.

31 posted on 08/11/2012 5:22:58 PM PDT by itsahoot (Old people cost too much money. They make lots of typos too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

“Their blood be upon their own heads”...

32 posted on 08/11/2012 10:00:05 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

One reason why they wait until now is because they probably now have very real targets, more advanced weaponry, and all other options are truly exhausted. To the first issue particularly, if they hit facilities that are 3 years from completion then the Iranians would only be 3 years closer to rebuilding them. Destroying them just before they go online sets them back to square one. And like I said, the honorable thing to do is to wait until there are no more options. This attack won’t be pretty, or easy, and will cause Israel a lot of international condemnation and scorn (what else is new, I know) but at least they could honestly say that they tried every other avenue and this was a last resort. Worse, Israel will probably take damage and casualties from an attack by Hezbullah in Lebanon and hamas in Gaza. Fortunately Syria is distracted.

33 posted on 08/11/2012 10:24:41 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Somehow, Turkey is ticked at Israel,too. Israel doesn’t need that. While not a superpower by any means, Turks are pretty scrappy. And I don’t believe Israel will use nukes in a preemptive strike. I don’t really believe they will use them unless they are nuked. and a conventional war with Iran could be very costly. Iran is a pretty big country. all good reasons try everything else first,IMHO

34 posted on 08/12/2012 6:22:15 PM PDT by Quickgun (Second Amendment. The only one you can put your hands on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bender2; Fennie; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; ...

Barry be about to “Wag the Dog.”

35 posted on 08/12/2012 8:28:16 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Choose: Ineligible Marxist Mad Dog or Mild-Mannered Mormon Milquetoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
So many loose lips in Israel and all over the world have been rambling on and on about an attack on this or that date using this or that many Israeli F-15Is will be used, what direction they will be coming in from, which sites are to be hit with which ordnance. This is the most absurd military situation in history. The most talked about, debated, lectured, press-released military attack in history when, in fact, it will be like the North Korean suprise of OH? REALLY? You detonated a bomb??? Gee whiz!

The so called world community is a rotted hull of empty words where the Jews and Israelis will have their backs to the wall once again and forced to act, only to be condemned by the very parties who give a sigh of relief after the deed is done. Why does a threatened population of 5.6 million Jews have to take out the planet's dirty laundry once again! The Israelis neutralized Saddam's Iraq in 1981, Syria's Assad in 2007 and now, they have to do this again? All Alone??????

36 posted on 08/12/2012 11:44:18 PM PDT by Netz (Netz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

America is going to get hit, too.

Leftists, jihadists, open border invaders, diversity racists...gun confiscation, martial law...Russia?’s going to get as ugly as Dear Reader, his treasonous media, and his warty, moldy czars in America.

I pray that is not so, but it all looks pretty bad and the GOP won’t protect the country. The military and Homeland inSecurity is naming the Tea Party, Christians, constitutionalists and other conseratives as the domestic terrorists theatening global progress and rule.

If America gets out from under these freaks without suffering terrible violence, it will be a miracle.

37 posted on 08/13/2012 1:16:27 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...
The Israelis will not be intimidated by this of course, and have a number of options.

The casual tone of many of the the "Attack Iran" conversations on this site are extremely disturbing, at least to me. The military option seems to me to be nowhere near "on the table" for many reasons. To begin with, Iran is larger than Western Europe, making it a much better missile target (for thousands of missiles) than an airplane objective, especially since Israel has no bases within range and would have to refuel over hostile airspace. Even if all the potential targets were known, it would be impossible to prevent immediate missile retaliation against Israel. Iran took a million KIA against Iraq and would not be passive in the face of even an overwhelming attack. In addition, many of the primary "nuclear" targets are underground and doubtless hardened to the point where a pinpoint nuclear attack would probably be the only option. The idea of a limited strike against nuclear plant targets only seems also a non-starter to me.

Any military action against Iran would have to be at the very least, on the scale of a Gulf War III. I sincerely hope Obama is not entertaining any thoughts of an October Surprise in Iran. I'm fairly certain the Israelis aren't.

There is also the usually unspoken issue of the Shiite mindset. Their theology calls for an Armageddon, in which the Earth is to be wiped clean by fire, so that Allah The All Wise can remake it as a Shiite Earthly Paradise, with no bad Muslims (i.e., non-Shiites,) and certainly no Infidels. Defeat does not matter. After all their highest holy day celebrates the loss of the Battle of Karbala and they march in the streets inflicting terrible wounds on themselves until the parade route runs with blood.

You ain't dealing with Presbyterian People from Peoria.

38 posted on 08/13/2012 7:53:16 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Choose: Ineligible Muslim Marxist Mad Dog or Mild-Mannered Mormon Milquetoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Thanks KB. The Iranians plan to strike first, but it will be against the US; the diplomatic and other manuevers going on right now are being done to hamstring our other enemies so they don’t dogpile on when the mullaholes try to shut off the oil and launch street level terror attacks here on US soil.

39 posted on 08/13/2012 4:31:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I think Benji is seriously pushing Zero’s buttons. Zero’s gonna’ have to buy himself a whole drawer of new undies!

40 posted on 08/13/2012 6:38:12 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson