Skip to comments.The Most Divisive Campaign in American History
Posted on 08/14/2012 5:08:54 AM PDT by SJackson
- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -
The Most Divisive Campaign in American History
Posted By Daniel Greenfield On August 14, 2012 @ 12:30 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 1 Comment
In 1980, when President Reagan asked Americans, “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” it was still possible to campaign on a theme as simple as the job performance of the other guy. But now, 32 years later, the campaign hinges on a much more fundamental split among the voting population.
Romney appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with the last four years. Obama appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with America.
This basic gap was obscured in the 2008 campaign by the window trappings of inspiration. Among all the plastic pillars and stolen quotes from poets who stole them from sermons, it was harder to see that the underlying theme of the campaign was dissatisfaction with America. But in 2012, Obama can no longer run as a reformer or an optimist.
The coalition that he committed to last year is a coalition of those who are unhappy with America, not in the last four years, but in the last two-hundred years. Its core is composed of groups that fear democracy and distrust the will of the people. There is no optimism here, but a deeply rooted pessimism about human nature and the country as a whole. It is the Democratic Party’s coalition against democracy.
After 2010, the numbers were crunched, and it was clear that Obama and the Democrats could not win a mainstream campaign. Instead, they targeted narrow groups, stirred up conflicts over issues aimed at that group, whether it was union pensions, racism or birth control. There was no more pretense of a national election, only a frenzied rush to polarize as many groups as possible and join them together into an acrimonious coalition, not so much for anything, as against Republicans.
There isn’t any inspiration here. Just paranoia over everything from gay marriage to abortion to racial profiling to illegal immigration. A dozen illegal benefits being handed out with the explicit threat that they will be lost if Romney wins. A dozen mini-civil wars being stirred up to divide Americans and set them at each other’s throats for the benefit of the Obama campaign.
From Occupy Wall Street to Wisconsin, from Trayvon Martin to Chick-fil-A, the goal of these manufactured conflicts has been to divide and conquer the electorate by emphasizing group rights over individual economic welfare.
Obama can’t win on the economy. He can’t win on foreign policy. He can’t win on any aspect of his administration. All he can do is stir up violence and then promise to heal the country in his second term while winking to all the representatives of the grievance groups. It’s not a new game, but the Democratic Party has never played it quite this baldly in a national election. And if it succeeds, then national politics will have finally been reduced to the level of a Chicago election.
We were expected to believe that the typical Obama voter in 2008 was hoping for a better country, but in 2012 there is no more hope, only hate and fear. The typical Obama voter is not acting as an American, but as a representative of an entitled group looking to secure and expand those entitlements at the expense and the detriment of the country at large.
To vote for Obama after years of grotesque economic mismanagement that has no precedent in history, that exceeds the worst actions of Andrew Jackson or Ulysses S. Grant, is not the instinct of an American, but a selfish greedy looter scrambling to grab a few dinner rolls off the tray while the ship is going down. There is no policy justification for voting for a man with the worst economic and foreign policy record in the country’s history. There is no American justification for voting for him. Only the UnAmerican motivation of carving up a dying country into group fiefdoms privileging identity politics over the common good.
This is an UnAmerican campaign. It is an Anti-American campaign. It is a campaign by those who hate and fear what America was and who resent having to care about anyone outside their own group. Its group jingoism, its dog whistles and special privileges are repulsive and cynical, treating the people of a great nation like a warren of rats eager to sell each other out for a prize from the Cracker Jack box of identity politics entitlements.
There is not a single Obama voter anywhere in the land who believes that another four years of him will make this country better. Not a single one from coast to coast. No, what they believe is that he will make the country a worse place for those people that they hate. That he will have four more years to sink their ideas deeper in the earth, regardless of how many families go hungry and how many fathers kill themselves because they can no longer take care of their families. What they believe is that Obama will grant their group more special privileges and the rest of the country can go to hell.
In his DNC keynote address in 2004, Obama said, “There is no Black America or White America or Latino America or Asian America, there is just the United States of America.” And now he has completely disavowed it. He isn’t campaigning to lead the United States of America, instead he is running for the presidency of a dozen little Americas, Trayvon Martin America, Abortion America, Illegal Alien America, Sharia America, Gay Marriage America, Starbucks America and any others you can think of. And if he can collect enough of these little Americas together, then he may get the privilege of running the United States of America into the ground for another four years.
Obama has never been the President of the United States of America. He has been the president of Washington, D.C., of Wall Street and of Solyndra. He has been the President of Green America and of Chicago. He has been the President of Warren Buffett, George Soros, Bill Gates, Penny Pritzker and James Crown. He is the President of George Clooney, Harvey Weinstein and Anne Hathaway. And now, facing disaster, he still isn’t running to be President of a country, but of a dozen little countries with money from freshly bailed out Green America and Wall Street, not to mention Hollywood.
The Obama campaign is not accidentally divisive. It did not stumble into divisiveness. It is not even divisive as a byproduct of its real aims. Divisiveness is its aim. Divisiveness is the only way that a divisive administration can hold on to power. The anger and the violence are not an accident, they are the whole point. Set one group against another, feed the hate, massage the grievances and very soon there is no longer a nation but a handful of quarreling groups being roped into a mutual alliance to reelect their lord protector whose appeal is that of the outsider becoming the insider.
Bain is a metaphor whose details don’t truly matter. The target audience for that swill doesn’t really care where Romney was when a steel plant was shut down. It doesn’t care that like so many private equity bigwigs, the man who actually was in charge is one of Obama’s bundlers. This isn’t about truth, it’s about menace. The Bain message is that Romney is a man who takes things away. That is the image that the UnAmerican alliance is meant to take away. The ominous sense that Obama’s era of giving them things is about to come to a close and Romney’s era of taking away things will begin.
It doesn’t take much prompting for the UnAmericans to come to this conclusion. Thieves are always looking over their shoulders. They always expect to have their ill-gotten gains taken away from them. And that is Obama’s true achievement. Like Tammany Hall, he has corrupted a massive section of the population and made it complicit in his criminality. What the old political machines did to cities or small groups of vested interests, the Zero has done to tens of millions, if not a hundred million people, who want him in power not because they think he’s the best man for the job, but because he’s their crook. The middle man for a crime ring that begins with him and ends with them.
The true insidious evil of the man is that he is the face of a machine of power and privilege that turns Americans into UnAmericans, that corrupts and degrades every ideal and principle, suborns every office and picks every pocket, while wrapping that thievery in the flag and every bit of history that it can filch. The Hussein Way is the clearest expression of the rot at the heart of the Democratic Party, the marriage of leftist agitation and powermongering with the old urban political machines for a level of abuse usually seen only in banana republics.
The abomination in Washington is a welfare-state technocracy that mixes crony capitalism with radical social policy. It steals from everyone and gives back to some. It plays the game of divide and conquer with the panache of marketing executives knowing that the worse the economy is, the more likely everyone is to look in everyone else’s mouth. Its worst aspect is its insistence on cloaking its cynicism as righteousness, wrapping every ugly means in the glorious flag of the ends when the truth is that its means are its ends.
Divide and conquer isn’t just a means to the greater end of giving Zero Hussein another four years. And perhaps another four years after that. It’s also the end. Every tyrant from Joseph Stalin to Saddam Hussein knew that a divided people are easier to rule. The more you divide them, the less likely they are to give you any trouble when you’re raiding their last pennies to pay for the latest Green gimmick that your billionaire backers have thrown up all over Wall Street.
Obama is the ultimate Post-American figure passing himself off as the embodiment of all that is truly American. But the UnAmericans got the real message in 2008 and in 2012 there is no other message. There is no more hope and faith, and the ones who have been waiting for are the UnAmericans who think that they are about to come into their own, when they are little more than pawns being used to rob and destroy a great nation.
This is the Post-American, Anti-American and UnAmerican campaign to divide up, carve up and toss aside the laws and traditions of the United States and replace them with the power of arrogance. It is the last stand of a beleaguered nation facing barbarians inside its gate. Every previous election was a contest between two American candidates who wanted to preside over the United States.
This is an election contest between the United States and an emerging Post-American order. That entity will be an American EU run by unelected bureaucrats, governed by politically correct technocrats and upheld by corrupt financial pirates disguising the collective bankruptcy with numbers games so elaborate that they make every billion-dollar con game and pyramid scheme that has come before seem as simple as child’s play.
The entity is already here. Its czars are running things in D.C., and its judges are dismantling both constitutional government and democratic elections. It creates a crisis and then makes sure that it doesn’t go to waste. It has excellent design skills and terrible planning skills. It has all the money in the world and none at all. It is the Post-American America, and 2012 is its big referendum. The one that will decide whether this Post-American America, this horrid graft of E.U. governance and Mussolini economics, Soviet propaganda and FDR volunteerism, Tammany populist criminality and U.N. foreign policy will be permitted to devour the United States of America.
Obama cannot win an American election. But he isn’t running in an American election. He’s running in a Post-American election.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
To vote for Obama after years of grotesque economic mismanagement that has no precedent in history, that exceeds the worst actions of Andrew Jackson or Ulysses S. Grant, is not the instinct of an American, but a selfish greedy looter scrambling to grab a few dinner rolls off the tray while the ship is going down.
I would describe them a little more harshly, but this is a good start...
WOW. This article is very insightful and accurate. A PAC should make an ad and highlight the points of this article.
I’ll second that “WOW.” He hit the nail on the head.
How do I fit all of this onto a bumper sticker?
There, fixed it.
With a really, really wide car.
This article deserves more than 9 replies.
This is so spot-on it does take some time to digest.
Nothing left to say, actually.
Daniel Greenfield has put words to my hostility.
I was a bit surprised myself, but not overly, because like Weston says, there is really nothing else to be said.
I've been through this with other Sultan Knish articles where I and others would like to say something but after a while you just run out of superlatives. Some of these analyses - they are so good, so complete that there is no comment that adds anything to them. Then add to that there are so many of this caliber.. that is what puts Greenfield in a class by himself, IMO.
Excellent..saving to re read.
What, oh, yeah ... here it is:
Right now we're running a close second to 1860. What will happen, will happen. We'll see.
I just wish I was 29 instead of 69, 'cause I'd love to be there when the gloves finally come off.
That might have been be a nice cartoon, if the artist ever learned how to draw mouths so they didn’t look like Hitler mustaches.
Excellent article, thx for posting.
He didn't just hit it, he hammered it flush. Excellent article.
I like Boortz’s three options: Looters, Moochers and Producers. Govt is in a symbiotic relationship with the parasites to bleed the producers dry.
It’s a gift.
Obama cannot win an American election. But he isnt running in an American election. Hes running in a Post-American election.
Everything said here is completely true ... and Romney will ignore it completely.
Slow start, but good to see the interest building up!
that pic of the bambam with a finger placemarking the book, says it all...
“I like Boortzs three options: Looters, Moochers and Producers. Govt is in a symbiotic relationship with the parasites to bleed the producers dry.”
No matter what the form of government. Czarist Russia, the Soviet Union, the French monarchy and the republic of Rome all fell when an idle class or classes were allowed to strip the producers down to subsistence levels despite all their work.
“Everything said here is completely true ... and Romney will ignore it completely.”
He is almost meaningless in the overall situation though. He will ride the wave like inert flotsam. The wave is what is significant.
1 Cor 11:19
But, of course, there must be divisions among you so that you who have God’s approval will be recognized!
BUMP for a really great article! This guy has squarely hit the bullseye!!
Just wow. Greenfied does it again.
Me, too. It seems like divide and conquer still works, even in a very modern country. It's as if we were always just another banana republic ready to be taken over. I'm more than a little taken back by how easy this takeover seems to be - but still hopeful that it will not be finalized in November.
Even the divisiveness on FR in the last 6 months has played into the takeover effort. Perhaps for very difference reasons, but nonetheless helpful is so many ways with true conservatives now opting to not vote for POTUS as all this time around. We seem to be doomed.
Increasingly, I'm sensing an R&R landslide. In the end, the hard-casers on FR and their like will not have made a difference.
This is unfortunate...as, in order to have influence within an administration, one should usually be seen as a supporter. Anti-Romney, anti-Mormon conservative activists aren't going to have much sway for the next eight years.
Interestingly enough, this has been on my mind since the Ryan pick setoff a seimic shaker in the political world. I'm starting to see 2012 as 1932 in reverse. In other words, Romney will establish a new governing coalition like FDR did in '32, except that it will be opposite to FDR's New Deal coalition.
This coalition would consist of moderate independents, Jacksonian Democrats, and mainstream Republicans, the kind that FReepers like to refer to as RINO's. If conservatives are not seen as a part of this coalition, come the day after the inauguration when they ask for a seat at the table. they will be cast into the outer darkness where there will be nothing but weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth. It creates a dilemma as to how to exert political influence.
African Americans for Obama
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders for Obama
Latinos for Obama
LGBT Americans for Obama
First Americans for Obama
Women for Obama
Old White Guys for Obama
... everybody luvs 0buma!
I agree, a landslide just may play out of the 2010 results along with a clear understanding of what Obama has done and what he may do if given 4 more years.
Anti-Romney, anti-Mormon conservative activists will end up on the outside looking in.
Just wow. Greenfied does it again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.