Posted on 08/17/2012 7:54:35 AM PDT by kevcol
I’m seeing a major sea change in reportage. Usually if the perp is a democrat the party affiliation is buried deep in the story, if it is mentioned at all.
Here it’s in the first sentence.
What’s up with that?
A picture is worth a thousand words.
Thanks.
I think.
Where would homos be without DUCT TAPE?
(R)Republican ....
Your right. In another era this guy would be tarred and feathered. It all pretty disgusting.
The new face of the Democrat party.
Queerdom is going to be part of the democrats reelection platform this year. They're going pro-anal.
Sex with young boys is all they can offer in exchange for a vote this time. There isn't any money left for monetary freebies.
Confused young boys are plentiful. The government schools are cranking out indoctrinated boys by the thousands every year.
(Mark my words. Cannibalism of these young boys will be next. The homos are unsatisfiable. They always need a bigger rush than the last to get off. Sex with these boys, because it's become so easy, will start to bore them.)
I am not familiar with this Representative or his District, but I ask those of you who are, is this guy going to get reelected?
According to the libs, this guy is qualified to be a Boy Scout adult leader.
If this sicko wasn’t “out” before, I would think the sheer sordidness of this incident would disturb enough of his constituents that they might not vote for him. Of course I was sure Bill Clinton was through once the DNA surfaced on Monica’s pretty blue dress. I realized when the democrats didn’t kick him out of office that this country had changed for the worse.
state rep not congress
I have been told for years now homosexuals are normal. So I tried to act normal and advertised on craigslist for anonymous unprotected sex with 17 year old girls and no one answered. I even offered to meet them in a romantic bathroom stall. Still no answer. I am so confused.
Perverted Dems ON Parade>>
Not on NBC this fall..
Uh... You might want to check that outrage because it's not even "statutory rape" in your state of Missouri since the "boy" was 17 which legal age in MO has been since at least 1995. (566.034)
Age of consent is 16 in Minnesota where this incident took place. The only "crime" here is the public nature of the act which could've amounted to misdemeanor indecent conduct. Considering the very public nature of "exposure" thanks to the lawmaker's job, where's the upside to expending resources to prosecute when you likely wouldn't usually and Gauthier is now subject to permanent, national shame?
guy is a minn state rep, and good question, i use to live in the district he reps, most people in northern minn are soc libs and fiscal con, so not sure it he will get reelected or not. do know the local fish wrap will not let this go.
The true iron rangers won’t take kindly to this kind of thing. The metro tree-huggers that have infested the north shore since the 1970’s will donate even more tourist dollar cash from their tea shops, bead and trinket sales to this pedophile maggot.
To bad this freak isn’t running against Chip Cravaak.
17 year olds for restroom romps
“most people in northern minn are soc libs and fiscal con”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.