Posted on 08/18/2012 12:32:46 PM PDT by CaptainKrunch
Politically speaking, Navy SEALs aren’t the safest targets to rail against in a presidential race, but the Obama campaign isn’t hesitating to take down a group of former SEALs who’ve criticized the president’s national security decisions.
On Thursday morning, campaign officials waged a full court press against the Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund, a group of former U.S. Special Forces and intelligence officials accusing President Obama of leaking vital national security secrets and taking too much credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden. When the group launched its anti-Obama media campaign Wednesday, consisting of TV ads and a 22-minute film, it wasn’t clear if Obama officials would avoid a potentially messy confrontation or refute the military veterans publicly. But now the campaign has made clear it views the attacks in the same light as the 2004 John Kerry “Swift Boat” attack ads, which, however misleading, were painfully effective.
“The Republicans are resorting to ‘Swift Boat’ tactics because when it comes to foreign policy and national security, Mitt Romney has offered nothing but reckless rhetoric,” Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt told Reuters’ Mark Hosenball last night. Taking a direct shot at the leaders of OPSEC, an Obama campaign official lambasted the group’s accusations about national security leaks this morning. “No one in this group is in a position to speak with any authority on these issues and on what impact these leaks might have,” said the official, speaking on background, “and it’s clear they’ve resorted to making things up for purely political reasons.”
Thank you for you service swift boat vets!Just a month ago O'crapy was proclaiming himself to be a hero to the American public for making the "ballsy" decision to send the SEAL team in to risk their lives to kill bin laden, and now O'crapy is attacking the very same American patriots who not only made him look good by killing bin laden, but also got the embarassing birth certificate issue off the front pages for him. Remember that? The birth certificate issue was front and center across the entire nation, then suddently bin laden is dead within the same week and everyone forgot about his birth certificate.
_____________________________________
Dishonorable Disclosures (22:00 Youtube video)
Special Operations (OPSEC) (website to get involved)
This probably also infuriates Obama because he was counting on the “trailers” for the upcoming movie about how “he” took out Bin Ladin to be airing around election time and show the world what a hero he is. This documentary may complicate his victory march just a little!
It is only a matter of time before speculation that those members of Seal Team 6 who were shot down shortly after Obama blabbing about things that SHOULD have been confidential might be alive today if it weren’t for White House leaks. Sad when our own President is an Enemy of the State.
I just made a contribution to OPSEC. The video will pi$$ off any true American!
For 16 years, Barack Obama represented in public that he was born in Kenya:
Despite 16 years of portraying himself as "born in Kenya," in December 2010, Obama, as Commander In Chief of the US Military, allowed a decorated war veteran and Army Flight surgeon, Terry Lakin, to be wrongfully court-martialed while being denied the right of discovery. Lakin was unjustly punished with six months in prison, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and dishonorable discharge from the US Army for questioning Obama's questionable eligibility as President and, consequently, Obama's authority to give lawful orders to the military.
And now both the SEALs and the birth certificate will come around to bite him in the butt - because HI registrar Alvin Onaka issued a verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett confirming that Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is not legally valid and the White House’s posted long-form is not a “true and accurate representation” of the original record on file.
Obama couldn’t wait days or weeks for the captured intel to be exploited before telling the whole world about the Bin Laden assassination, because the world was noticing that the long-form he called genuine at a White House press conference was just a very bad fake. Now that fact has been confirmed by Alvin Onaka.
And the reason for it to be faked has also been confirmed by Alvin Onaka: because the record Hawaii has is not legally valid; it has stamps on it indicating that it is not legally valid - most likely because it is LATE and ALTERED.
Obama tried to buy himself more time by sacrificing all the work (and ultimately also the lives) of SEAL Team 6. He wasn’t afraid of showing himself to be a self-centered, egomaniacal dolt who would sacrifice national security for his own popularity... because the alternative was that the evidence itself would show him to be even worse: a foreign enemy combatant who is out to destroy - from within our own White House - this country and the military he illegally commands.
Good list.
It makes for an unassailable mark in the annals of history
and a more lasting impression on would-be tyrants.
I’m glad I saw your reply, because I was going to write the same thing: “They were effective, because they were the truth.” Absolutely!!
“HI registrar Alvin Onaka issued a verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett confirming that Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is not legally valid and the White House’s posted long-form is not a “true and accurate representation” of the original record on file.”
butterdezillion, please elaborate on this assertion.
MY HERO’S!
Thanks for posting this.
Thanks for your support. How people can fail to be roused by the info in just those few facts is beyond me. And the mountain of evidence which Congress continues ot ignore has become overwhelming.
I fear our Republic may not survive the precedent resulting from this attack on the Constitution if we do not collectively demand justice and establish safeguards to uphold the "natural born Citizen" provision of Article II, Section 1.
Our elected officials have neglected their oath to the Constitution. Our gov't should be responsible for certification of all candidates BEFORE their names appear on any ballot. Instead, they foist that national security task off on the biased political parties who are nominating their candidates.
It is worse than negligence.
Well, he ain't very consistent.
Part of your "h" key is busted; better replace it.
In addition to this video, here in CA the movie 2016 is sold out with long lines waiting to get in. My neighbor said that at the end of the movie yesterday, the audience stood and chanted USA, USA, and one-term, one-term. Barry and his merry host of traitors are getting exposed.
Barry’s attempt to take on the Navy Seals, our American heroes, will backfire; count on it.
Well hate him or not, call him a PT Barnum, but Donald Trump says he is going to make a big announcement at the Repub. convention. Will he present absolute proof of the Kenyans birth? That should be interesting.
Seriously? Odumbo is the idiot who, during a debate with McLame, threatened to invade Pakistan!!
No, it's just that my fat fingers slop over more than one key at a time.
When is this country going to get their head out of their asses and get rid of this moron that they elected. Hes a disgrace to everyone that is American,to the Country and everything it stands for.
“It is only a matter of time before speculation that those members of Seal Team 6 who were shot down shortly after Obama blabbing about things that SHOULD have been confidential might be alive today if it weren’t for White House leaks. Sad when our own President is an Enemy of the State.”
Something about that whole situation was fishy. And that includes Osama’s burial at sea. I’ve often wondered if those in that shot down helicopter were killed for one of two reasons:
1) the leaks gave away their position or
2) they knew too much.
Or maybe the leaks were the means to an end?
The party that lost China and North Korea could care less about the damage done by its leaks. They need to fool enough voters to get re-elected and continue the elimination of of our military.
All this info needs to be sent to every single congressman in the US with words that we expect them to uphold the Constitution of the US of which they put their hands on Bibles and swore to do.
Wow! That’s great news about that movie. BO is one scary monster.
I just sent an urgent Freepmail to a bunch of you about this subject. Let me know if any of you didn’t get it.
I can elaborate a little more here. I have checked out this legal reasoning with a couple well-known lawyers and it is legally sound.
HRS 338-14.3 governs letters of verification in lieu of a certified copy. It REQUIRES the HDOH to verify the existence of a birth certificate and any other facts (related to the vital event) presented to be verified by an eligible requestor. They are not given discretion to ignore any part of a request. Verification is certification that the event actually happened as described by the requestor. So the only legal reason for a fact presented by an eligible requestor to not be verified is if the HDOH CANNOT certify that the event actually happened that way. Specifically, if they don’t have that claim on a legally probative/valid vital record.
So them’s the rules that HI registrar Alvin Onaka has to play by.
Ken Bennett sent 2 pages to the HDOH. We have copies of those pages. One was the verification application which the HDOH webpage says is to request both certified copies and letters of verification. On that page Bennett requested that Onaka verify that BArack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to mother Stanley Ann Dunham and father Barack Hussein Obama.
The other page was additional requests - that Onaka verify “from the birth record” other items like the time of birth, hospital, etc AND that he verify that a copy of Obama’s posted long-form is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.
Onaka responded by verifying that they have a birth record for Barack Hussein Obama II which claims (”indicating”) that he was born in Honolulu, HI. He had a list of other items but didn’t say what he was verifying about them - whether it was that they were true, or that they were simply “from the birth record”. And he verified that the information contained in Obama’s posted long-form matches the original record.
Most people assumed that meant that he was verifying that the claims on Obama’s posted long-form are true. But if you paid close attention to HRS 338-14.3 you see the exact opposite is true. Onaka did not verify ANYTHING from the actual verification application. NOTHING. The only reason allowed by the law is if he CAN’T certify that the birth really happened that way. We know that the claims on Obama’s posted long-form match what is claimed on the actual record at the HDOH, so the only reason left for them to not be able to certify that those facts are true.... is if the record itself is not probative/valid.
And though Onaka tried to substitute his own verification about Obama’s posted long-form, the simple fact is that the law required him to verify WHAT HE WAS ASKED to verify - that the posted long-form is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” - and he did not verify that. Again, the only allowable reason for him to fail to verify that is if he CAN’T. IOW, he just verified that Obama’s posted long-form is NOT a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.
Knowing that to be the case, we look at what he actually DID “verify” in a totally different light. Specifically, his list of other items from the BC HAD to be simply verifying that they are “from the record” and not that they are actually true. His use of the word “indicating” (”indicating that he was born in Honolulu, HI”) only means that the record CLAIMS that - not that it is true.
So what Onaka verified by the words he actually used in his response is that they have a birth record for Obama which makes the same claims as is on Obama’s posted long-form. What he verified by what he refused to say is that the record is not legally valid and the posted long-form is a forgery.
The information in the biography could only have come from Obama. And thus the hated "birthers" have been shown to be correct after all - oh, the horror for the political elites!
Thanks for the excellent synopsis and links.
Thank you for this informative post. I would like to re post this to facebook.
Sadly. the cowardly SOS in AZ has shown that this unconstitutional usurper will not be dealt with in the law, so Clayman has zero expectation of scaring any SOS nto actually honor their oath of office to their state’s constitution or The US Constitution for that matter. We are now in a lawless state, with a bastard commie affirmative action fraud at the helm ... well, he appears to be at the helm, albeit his strings are becoming more and more visible with every passing day. He is ‘the miracle boy’ (see PJTV.com, Afterburner, Miracles).
Thanks; please do.
And please also ask readers to consider the “Contact Congress” page at Article II:
http://www.art2superpac.com/contactcongress.html
“said the official, speaking on background”
Say it to their faces coward since you want even go on record with your name!
The problem as I see it (IANAL) is that you are trying to “warn” DNC officials and HI state officials that they could be convicted of a CRIME if they pull the same cr*p this time that they pulled last time.
But which law enforcement entity is going to investigate and prosecute this crime if (when) your warning is not heeded?
This is the same problem that Sheriff Arpaio faces. All of the federal prosecutors report up to Holder. All of the state prosecutors of both parties, including even Brewer in AZ, won't touch this for fear of being called racist birthers and want to just get on with the election. So only a congressional committee could take this on, but they are all back in their districts desperately trying to raise money and campaigning!
On the bright side, I believe that there are lawyers waiting to go into court with properly drafted filings on the NBC issue (not a criminal, but a civil matter) the minute that the DNC certifies Barry as qualified to serve after their election.
Do you have a link for this?
Onaka is scared enough (of being prosecuted) to tell the truth, and I’m sure he’s gotten far more pressure than, say, the SOS or AG of Wyoming or Utah. That gives me hope.
Eric Holder won’t be guarding the henhouse forever. I think Onaka knows that full well. And some of these other folks - especially at the more local levels - may figure that out too.
I can’t just twiddle my thumbs. I have to do something, and this is the best I can think to do.
Former Navy SEAL Team Six commander heads anti-Obama PAC
On Wednesday, the Law Enforcement Examiner reported that a group, Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund, Inc., began airing political advertisements criticizing President Barack Obama’s service as Commander in Chief. Now a former commander of Navy SEAL Team Six is leading a political action committee (PAC) with a simple mission: Defeat Barack Obama and his leaking White House. according to a press statement released on Thursday.
Ryan Zinke, a former commander of Navy SEAL Team Six, started a super PAC, Special Operations for America, which is dedicated to supporting Mitt Romney and slamming President Obama on leaks and on politicizing Bin Laden’s death. According to Mr. Zinke, these two super PACs are just the first salvo in what will be a sustained assault on the president by high-level ex-soldiers.
Zinke stated that the series of White House links and a campaign commercial showing the draft-dodger Bill Clinton questioning whether GOP candidate Mitt Romney would have given the order for SEAL Team Six to conduct a raid at Osama bin Laden’s hideout in Pakistan had a lot to do with organizing his PAC.
http://www.examiner.com/article/former-navy-seal-team-six-commander-heads-anti-obama-pac
I’m sure I’m nopt the only one just waiting for the court case which reaches the discovery pahse. This lying, foreign born, sonofabitch needs to be prosecuted, not just exposed for his criminal acts and treasonous behavior.
The presumption of regularity means that it has to be presumed at this point that Onaka handled this request properly and refused to verify any of the facts from the application because Obama’s HI BC is not legally valid - the only lawful reason for him to do so.
That means that the burden of proof falls on those who would claim that Obama’s record is legally valid. They would have to have evidence to overcome the presumption of regularity - specifically, evidence that Onaka did NOT handle this request properly.
This verification flips the burden of proof. I’ve been presenting evidence to overcome the presumption of regularity for the 1960-64 birth index, for instance - showing that it has legally non-valid records in it. That’s critical because without that evidence we have to presume that the 1960-64 birth index is genuine and accurate.
Well, now the shoe is on the other foot. Onaka’s legal response confirmed that Obama’s BC is not legally valid, and it is up to the other side to show evidence that Onaka’s verification is not genuine and accurate.
LOL
Sen. John Kerry's 2004 presidential bid became the catalyst for an unprecedented political movement by Vietnam veterans who had long resented his false 1971 testimony that American troops routinely committed war crimes.
Despite the best efforts of the Democratic Party and its old media affiliates, they succeeded in reaching out to the public and turning the presidential campaign upside down. Here, for the first time, is the complete story of how - and why - they did it.
John Kerry lied to Congress and ingratiated himself to fake Vietnam vets to his disgrace trying to make America look bad. The Swift Boaters were very honest but like the SEALS finally had enough of the political lies. Obama and Holder are in deep caca now with the cover up on their part of Fast and Furious...Mr. Obama the Republicans don't have to resort lies, the truth is on their side...you might want to walk to the American drummer this time.
In what venue? That is the problem. Who will be the defendant and in which court, state or federal? A plaintiff has to have standing (particularized damage attributable to the defendant not shared with the general population) to bring a civil cause of action and this has gone nowhere so far.
The full faith and credit clause tends to make lawyers steer away from challenging Hawaii's even minimal verifications of data elements seeming to affirm Barry was born in HI.
For a criminal charge, such as you are making, IIUC, the burden of proof is ALWAYS on the prosecution.
Barry has $ millions to stall any civil or criminal case until after the election. They had years to game this out and cement the firewalls.
IMO, the only thing that could remove Barry prior to the election is positive proof that he was born somewhere else (such as the UK Kew archive showing a Kenya birth), or some kind of even more damning evidence that the LFBC was forged, such as a confession by the forger (neither are likely at this point).
IOW there were leaks
I can’t do anything about the crimes already committed. The posse is so far the only law enforcement body willing to take that on.
But there are about to be some crimes committed. The legal presumption right now has to be that Obama’s HI BC is not legally valid. If Nancy Pelosi signs an OCON for Obama without having evidence to refute the presumption of regularity - specifically evidence that Onaka’s verification was in error - then she perjures herself.
At this point Obama can’t even get nominated as the Democratic candidate without perjuring himself and committing election fraud AND having the people who sign the OCON perjure themselves and commit election fraud as well. The DNC lawyer would have to suborn perjury and fraud to counsel any of them to sign any of the documents for Obama to get on any state ballot. That’s 50 instances of perjury and fraud these people are thinking about committing, in a setting where Eric Holder is about to lose his position as fox guarding the law enforcement henhouse.
Apparently Onaka thought better of playing chicken with the whole rest of the country, because he obeyed the law and told the truth when he could easily have lied instead, and let Eric Holder cover his behind (for a while).
The only thing Hawaii has presented that could be used as evidence that Obama has a legally-valid record is the 1960-64 birth index that had his name in it. But alas! I’ve already proven that it has legally non-valid records listed in it. So a name showing up in the 1960-64 birth index says NOTHING about the validity of the record.
Obama is just not right in da head! Nobody sane makes the kind of enemies this turd has...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
