Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: Paul Ryan is the perfect fit
foxnews.com/ ^ | August 18 2012 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 08/18/2012 4:09:06 PM PDT by NoLibZone

I think Paul Ryan is the perfect spec I didn't see it until Romney did it. I said -- Romney he'll make the right choice and I was right he made the right choice it's a beautiful synergy is the perfect combo platter there.

And there were many -- predicting he'd go safe there's a bold -- to this decision here's a here's my take on us. He said. We're gonna take on your economic ideas your failed policies we're gonna offer a bold alternative.

Video at link

(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; election2012; faghag; homosexualagenda; logcabinrepublican; mittgroupiecoulter; promitt; prostitute4homos; ryan; sisterwife

1 posted on 08/18/2012 4:09:17 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Under the Bus? GOPe?
2 posted on 08/18/2012 4:18:07 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Chosing Ryan = a choice between two dramatically divergent views of government spending & taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

When was the last time Ann had a combo platter? Who was president?


3 posted on 08/18/2012 4:27:07 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Zero interest in what Bill Maher’s love monkey has to say - about anything.


4 posted on 08/18/2012 4:34:23 PM PDT by JaguarXKE (If my Fluffy had a puppy, it would look like the puppy Obama ate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Ann Coulter lost her license to speak to conservatives. Nothing but a sell-out promoter of homosexualism.


5 posted on 08/18/2012 4:37:39 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

GOP-E has-been.


6 posted on 08/18/2012 4:42:39 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

If Mittens had picked Roseanne Barr as vp Ann would have found a way to praise the choice. Don’t get me wrong, Ryan should be on the top of the ticket, and Mittens should be forced to live in Mass under his socialist healthcare.


7 posted on 08/18/2012 4:51:47 PM PDT by mirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Ann has turned out to be a promoter of liberal candidates, except when she wants to sell books or her articles.

Maybe she thought she was lending her conservative creds to liberal Repubs. Only problem is that she lost her creds with a lot of conservatives. Now she just sounds like an empty pot with no convictions or principles.

8 posted on 08/18/2012 4:58:19 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE; xzins; GenXteacher

Wow. SOMEBODY’S got a hate on for Ann Coulter. This probably goes back for her early and earnest support fo Mitt Romney, with which I did NOT agree at the time, but consider the alternatives as they exist today.

We don’t need to be helping the really nasty David Axelrod smear machines with giving them ammunition. Not that I expect full co-operation with no grumbling, but really, fellows, can you not put away the switchblades for just a LITTLE while?

Ann IS right, Paul Ryan was truly an inspired choice, and while I realize he won’t necessarily be in a position to radically alter policy, I still believe that there are more points of agreement between him and Mitt Romney than friction points, and Paul Ryan can articulate those positives really a LOT better than Mitt can.


9 posted on 08/18/2012 5:00:07 PM PDT by alloysteel (Voter suppression is needed now more than ever. Only, whom shall be suppressed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I know that many on FR don’t like Ann anymore, but I still love her. She went early for Romney, and turned out to be right - in that he is all but certain to be the Pub nominee.


10 posted on 08/18/2012 5:35:29 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

It’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it!


11 posted on 08/18/2012 5:42:31 PM PDT by JaguarXKE (If my Fluffy had a puppy, it would look like the puppy Obama ate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

> Coulter: Paul Ryan is the perfect fit

Someone at Fox knows how to write a foxy headline.


12 posted on 08/18/2012 5:46:34 PM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

What really burns me up is the continued ranting against Romney...yeah, I don’t like him, but we don’t need to be told of his views and past votes, etc. He is what he is and on the other hand we have a commie who is bent on destroying America, which would be the end of FREEP...hear that? Stay home, pout and rant some more and Freep is gone. Do you think Romney will destroy Freep? America? I don’t think so. I would have wanted Palin with her faults but we have Plan A, which is America is GONE, and Plan B, where we have a squishy Republican with a conservative Ryan with him. I would drag anyone to the polls to keep Obama from finishing off our great country. It’s time to grow up and face reality. We are not idiots here which is why we are Freepers. Those who refuse to vote for Romney ARE VOTING FOR 0bama. Why do I put a zero in his name? Because I do suspect we’re being monitored by whom? 0bama,that’s who. Do you think Romney will monitor us? Will he send drones after us? Will he send Americorps after us? No. Take the country back or surrender it. Those who stay home are wimps.


13 posted on 08/18/2012 5:52:33 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

PS: I predict 2% will represent libtard fraud (dead people, illegals, voting 2x3x4x), thus, those who stay at home with their arms crossed are part of the problem. Revolt starts with voting the right way, even if it means holding your nose. If Davis can follow around Romney and support him, then that should be looked at as a miracle and treated as such. Vote!


14 posted on 08/18/2012 5:58:10 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Just a teachable moment for those here who get all wound up about what these pundits speak and spew....

It took Coulter all of 7 seconds to disclaim her choice of Gov. Christie and endorse Ryan as the perfect choice for VP... “It’s a perfect choice, I just didn’t see it until after Romney made it”.

So there you go. They’re seldom more than 7 seconds away from the Next Greatest Observation In The World.


15 posted on 08/18/2012 6:08:57 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I really don’t care what this backstabbing, self-serving harpy has to say anymore.


16 posted on 08/18/2012 6:40:45 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
....we don’t need to be told of his views and past votes, etc....

Step back and ponder that statement. And for heaven's sake, get a grip.

17 posted on 08/18/2012 7:01:35 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Finny

....we don’t need to be told of his views and past votes, etc....
Step back and ponder that statement. And for heaven’s sake, get a grip.


My point is that it is getting old; we know Romney’s past...we have path A and path B.


18 posted on 08/18/2012 7:04:03 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Finny; CincyRichieRich
....we don’t need to be told of his views and past votes, etc....

"Step back and ponder that statement."No,CincyRichieRich is exactly right. We've been told of Romney's "sins", over, and over, and over, and over. It's now time for y'all to get over it. You've convinced every one you're going to convince. Copying and pasting the same thing over and over again is a waste of bandwidth. It's just skipped. Maybe you should step back and ponder that.

19 posted on 08/18/2012 8:20:49 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Finny; CincyRichieRich
CincyRichieRich: We don’t need to be told of his views and past votes, etc....

"Step back and ponder that statement."No,CincyRichieRich is exactly right. We've been told of Romney's "sins", over, and over, and over, and over. It's now time for y'all to get over it. You've convinced every one you're going to convince. Copying and pasting the same thing over and over again is a waste of bandwidth. It's just skipped. Maybe you should step back and ponder that.

20 posted on 08/18/2012 8:23:06 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage; Finny; CincyRichieRich
We've been told of Romney's "sins", over, and over, and over, and over. It's now time for y'all to get over it

You realize that doesn't make sense, don't you?

If you had discovered that Romney had in fact murdered someone in the past would you be saying "time to get over it"?

So, getting over something depends on the enormity of the offense in the eyes of each beholder.

You say to me, "That's an over-the-top example. The example is irrelevant to the rule. It depends on how the offended person views the offense.

The truth is, Norway, that a committed, pro-life voter believes that with his $50 abortions that Romney IS complicit in murdering many, tiny someones.

21 posted on 08/19/2012 2:35:37 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins

2007 race
Dr. John Willke Endorses Mitt Romney

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/willke-romney/2007/10/22/id/321953
Dr. Willke, helped found the National Right To Life Committee and served for 10 years as its president. Dr. Willke serves as president of the Life Issues Institute, Inc., and president of the International Right to Life Federation.

National Right To Life
04/18/12
http://www.nrlpac.org/pdf/POTUS%20Comparison.pdf

Comparison chart Romney and Obama


22 posted on 08/19/2012 2:46:48 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Apparently, meg, there are many believers who take this more seriously than does Wilke.

In 2007, Romney was still describing is position as effectively pro-choice.

As the thread in 2007 pointed out, Wilke was duped.


23 posted on 08/19/2012 3:38:14 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xzins

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/08/17/new-obama-tv-ad-attacks-romney-ryans-pro-life-views/
Obama ad attacking pro life views of R and R

Romney has improved..note his views in comparison to Obamas from my previous link

I am not trying to change your mind or your vote..
Sunday Blessings.


24 posted on 08/19/2012 4:05:41 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

I watched the ad, and it’s obviously targeting women, and especially liberal or social-net women.

OTOH, a majority of the population now sides with the pro-life position to the extent that abortions must be the absolute minimum.

The hotwire in the ad was “rape and incest”. There aren’t many who really care about Planned Parenthood. I’m assuming that those instances in which Ryan supported limiting rape/incest abortions are those in which there is evidence that there was no rape or incest. I would call that confusion. They don’t support abortion for women who for whatever reason have a confused state of mind when it comes to killing their baby.

I don’t support killing anyone with a trial and due process of law.


25 posted on 08/19/2012 5:18:04 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xzins

http://www.nrlpac.org/pdf/POTUS%20Comparison.pdf
I was interested to see the differences in the Obama/ Romney positions as one or the other will be president in 2013.


26 posted on 08/19/2012 5:27:30 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
And you have Path C, the only constructive, conservative path: vote to weaken the mandate of whichever statist government tyrant wins.

If hearing about the extremity of Romney's liberalism is "getting old" -- what bigger warning sign do you need that you're about to make a big mistake? A year, two years, into a Romney term, how "old" would it be getting then, as you watched him serenely frog-march the entire Republican party to the left as moderate Republicans and his Democrat "friends" across the aisle supported the Beloved Romney (after all, Americans voted for him in droves!) in his "progressive" quest to "fix" the health care problem, the gay discrimination problem, the global warming problem, the abortion problem, and the judicial problem, by doing all the things Democrats do.

But you are busy squeezing your eyes shut, putting your fingers in your ears, and chanting: "nanananananananana ... we couldnt' survie another four years of Obama we couldn't survive another four years of Obama nanananananan...." in order to make yourself sanction giving more power to liberals -- and that is EXACTLY and ONLY what your vote for Romney would do.

27 posted on 08/19/2012 8:52:51 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
We've been told of Romney's "sins", over, and over, and over, and over. It's now time for y'all to get over it.

And how will you be "getting over it" when Romney's in office and using moderate Republicans along with Democrats to advance all the liberal causes you KNOW RIGHT NOW he is likely to advance?

As for admonishing me for copying and pasting the same thing over, and over, and over, and over -- you blind, stupid moron -- go into my in-forum posts and find where I have done that with my own posts EVEN ONCE. You are both an idiot and a liar, and obviously you DON'T ACTUALLY READ what people write.

You perfectly reflect the shallow, fuzzy-seeing mindset that being a Romney supporter requires.

28 posted on 08/19/2012 9:06:40 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Ann Coulter went nasty on US first. She definitely has a way with words but sadly she is not nearly as 'smart' as she believes of herself. The pervert agenda is a loser agenda no matter which political ego claims it is respectable.
29 posted on 08/19/2012 9:18:46 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Finny

And you have Path C, the only constructive, conservative path: vote to weaken the mandate of whichever statist government tyrant wins.
If hearing about the extremity of Romney’s liberalism is “getting old” — what bigger warning sign do you need that you’re about to make a big mistake? A year, two years, into a Romney term, how “old” would it be getting then, as you watched him serenely frog-march the entire Republican party to the left as moderate Republicans and his Democrat “friends” across the aisle supported the Beloved Romney (after all, Americans voted for him in droves!) in his “progressive” quest to “fix” the health care problem, the gay discrimination problem, the global warming problem, the abortion problem, and the judicial problem, by doing all the things Democrats do.

But you are busy squeezing your eyes shut, putting your fingers in your ears, and chanting: “nanananananananana ... we couldnt’ survie another four years of Obama we couldn’t survive another four years of Obama nanananananan....” in order to make yourself sanction giving more power to liberals — and that is EXACTLY and ONLY what your vote for Romney would do.


If you suggest C being Perot, then you are voting for 0bama.

If C means turmoil, upheaval at the convention then that remains to be seen.

If C means some hyperbole, imagined scenario in your mind that does not yet exist, then you’re dreaming.

Otherwise, what you posted is sheer nonsense. We don’t have time to play around.


30 posted on 08/19/2012 9:54:48 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Too many here opt for expressing their hate rather than restoring our Republic by tossing obomo from the People’s house.

There’s a reason I didn’t contribute this time. Perhaps after the election if sanity returns to the forum.


31 posted on 08/19/2012 10:18:23 AM PDT by citizen (America is at an awkward stage...Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Unfortunately, Meg, that should have been a comparison of the positions supported by each candidate when they’ve been in office. It is good to see the official positions of their campaign, and I know you’ve heard all about Mitt’s flip-flops.

It’s because of those that he is not trustworthy to those of us who think he merely adapted his position when he decided to run for president. And that would have been the 2008 primary season.


32 posted on 08/19/2012 11:02:16 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
If you suggest C being Perot, then you are voting for 0bama.

And do you also believe in the tooth fairy? Because I'm here to tell you that the tooth fairy is as much a figment of your imagination as the idea that voting third party is "the same as voting for Obama."

You're quite right, we don't have time to play games like handing the Republican party over to wholesale liberal statists like Romney and expecting a minority of conservative Republicans to "hold his feet to the fire." Time has run out. It's now time to face the music and FIGHT BACK, and the only way to fight back is to hold fast.

33 posted on 08/19/2012 11:08:51 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
We don’t have time to play around.

Please consider Tom Hoefling for President.

You don't have to be ashamed if you vote for Tom.

34 posted on 08/19/2012 11:13:38 AM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

“Wow. SOMEBODY’S got a hate on for Ann Coulter. This probably goes back for her early and earnest support fo Mitt Romney,”

Nope. Started with her support for GOProud, and her support for Myth Romney was merely the last straw.


35 posted on 08/19/2012 11:16:26 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: citizen
There’s a reason I didn’t contribute this time. Perhaps after the election if sanity returns to the forum.

Pardon me for calling you a shitheel leech, pal. You're the one recommending insanity by urging folks to vote FOR the original author of Obamacare and gay marriage. That you didn't contribute "this time" to the FReepathon but are still here posting, illustrates how the behavior of Romney's supporters, even (perhaps especially) their reluctant ones, speaks VOLUMES about their candidate.

36 posted on 08/19/2012 11:17:03 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

We don’t have time to play around.
Please consider Tom Hoefling for President.

You don’t have to be ashamed if you vote for Tom.


1992 Perot.
I thought I was smarter than my parents.
Tell me, what percent vote will Tom receive?
Tell me how many states he won’t be on the ballot?
Tell me which party will he pull votes from?

You know the answers; that results in 0bama killing off our country.
I can’t even believe there are some so hell bent on principles that they’re willing to lose their country just to be right. Do you realize after 2012 if Romney doesn’t win your pipe dream of the perfect candidate won’t have a chance to be noticed now or 2016????


37 posted on 08/19/2012 11:19:22 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Finny

If you suggest C being Perot, then you are voting for 0bama.
And do you also believe in the tooth fairy? Because I’m here to tell you that the tooth fairy is as much a figment of your imagination as the idea that voting third party is “the same as voting for Obama.”

You’re quite right, we don’t have time to play games like handing the Republican party over to wholesale liberal statists like Romney and expecting a minority of conservative Republicans to “hold his feet to the fire.” Time has run out. It’s now time to face the music and FIGHT BACK, and the only way to fight back is to hold fast.


1992 Perot.
I thought I was smarter than my parents.
Tell me, what percent vote will Tom receive?
Tell me how many states he won’t be on the ballot?
Tell me which party will he pull votes from?

You know the answers; that results in 0bama killing off our country.
I can’t even believe there are some so hell bent on principles that they’re willing to lose their country just to be right. Do you realize after 2012 if Romney doesn’t win your pipe dream of the perfect candidate won’t have a chance to be noticed now or 2016????


38 posted on 08/19/2012 11:22:36 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
I can’t even believe there are some so hell bent on principles that they’re willing to lose their country just to be right. Do you realize after 2012 if Romney doesn’t win your pipe dream of the perfect candidate won’t have a chance to be noticed now or 2016????

If? If Romney doesn't win???

I'm hoping that when Romney doesn't win, conservatives will unite behind a suitable candidate in 2016.

And, it isn't impossible that the GOP could nominate an appropriate candidate this year. If it is made clear enough to Romney that his candidacy is doomed, maybe he'll do the right thing and withdraw or agree to run for vice-president, as in Ryan-Romney, for example.

39 posted on 08/19/2012 11:26:39 AM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

I’m hoping that when Romney doesn’t win, conservatives will unite behind a suitable candidate in 2016.


Great strategy for a different planet.

There won’t be a country.

Why isn’t that clear to you?


40 posted on 08/19/2012 11:34:32 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson