Posted on 08/19/2012 10:44:19 AM PDT by Tau Food
We can help turn back the homosexual tide this year by opposing any candidate of either party who caves into the demands of the homosexual activists and who refuses to affirmatively support traditional family structures and values.
Then we have to oppose Romney.
A vote for Romney is a vote for the homosexual agenda.
To this day I still think Bill Clinton was sharing Monica with Hillary.
Well, I guess I can’t fault your logic there.
I wouldn’t be surprised. There was some serious moral decay in that family, that’s for sure.
I’m worried about the long-term effects when our leaders refuse to stand up to the homosexual lobby. What do the kids see and hear?
The sex positive agenda isn’t about science. They will tout BULLSTALIN studies if that is what it takes to persuade the mushy middle.
Their declared goal is to end ALL moral judgments over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
They consider orgasm to be a birthright that should be enjoyed at every age.
Positive.org encourages teens to “just say yes” because there are too many fuddy duddies.
http://www.positive.org/JustSayYes/index.html
Science is not in the equation for their agenda. It’s only a mere distraction to sway some to support their goals.
What vote in the 2012 presidential election will stop the homosexual agenda in 2013?
“A vote for Romney is a vote for the homosexual agenda.”
No. A vote for Romney is an acknowledgement that we have no alternatives in 2012. And Romney would be slightly less aggressive in punishing religious groups that disagree with him.
Sometimes, a quarter loaf is all that is available. Or even a slice...
However, I tired of gays trying to ram their lifestyle down everyone’s throats....no pun intended.
In addition, marriage is a religious institution and always has been....deal with it because I refuse to compromise my religious beliefs to satisfy the gay community.
Romney never has spoken out against the homosexual agenda, but he sure has issued a lot of statements about how he LOVES homosexuals. If he isn't an active homo, then he is a wanna-be homo.
I have to ask the question of whether or not Romney was ever one of the Temple Workers who hand washed the private parts of young men during the "sacred" Temple ritual before the young men were given their own pair of magic underwear.
Does anyone have any information on that?
1. Voting for as many Conservatives as possible in the Congressional races.
2. Vote with your buying power by avoiding "gay friendly" businesses, when possible.
I get it about Romney's less than Conservative record, but in January the President will either be him or Obama. As someone else pointed out, we need to elect Romney to stop Obama, and a Conservative Congress to stop Romney.
No matter how you slice it, a vote for Romney is a vote in favor of the homosexual agenda.
Romney has been one of the most active proponents of the homosexual agenda in either party.
Even Barney Frank issued a statement condemning Boston and Chicago for trying to ban Chick-fil-A, but Romney couldn't be bothered. He was too busy trying to convince the Boy Scouts to turn their Boy Scout camps into homosexual orgy fests.
Romney never has spoken out against the homosexual agenda, but he sure has issued a lot of statements about how he LOVES homosexuals. If he isn't an active homo, then he is a wanna-be homo.
I have to ask the question of whether or not Romney was ever one of the Temple Workers who hand washed the private parts of young men during the "sacred" Temple ritual before the young men were given their own pair of magic underwear.
Does anyone have any information on that?
Well, obviously I can't confirm that, or disprove it for that matter. Another possible explanation for Romney's support for the homosexual agenda is that the homosexual agenda is a gateway issue for extending support for what the Mormons call "plural marriage." So, there may be some of that going on here, too.
It's enough for me that both major candidates are soft on homosexuals and I'm not sure how much I want to know about all of the reasons.
Even old supposed ‘conservative’ Rush has join up with the perverts. He came unglued over the demand for US to pay for contraceptives for women, but, he embraced EltonJon, pervert of perverts at his ‘wedding’... This ROT is wide and deep. YES, I am repulsed at what these so called conservative yackers and political egos have devolved into ignoring WHO is literally in control....
There is NOTHING fiscally conservative about social liberalism .... How much taxpayer dollars have been diverted to prop up the pervert agenda? So why would not ‘women’ think they tooooo should get their ‘sex’ acts covered?
yep
him and Obama
voting for evil is still eveil, whether one is wrong more or not
balancing my check book is not an excuse to vote for sodomy
Yes, indeed. It is a national sin and a national disgrace.
None of us are spared. None of us will be spared.
The time has come for action.
Wasn’t Paul Ryan an altar boy?
It is not that the two major candidates are merely "soft" on homosexuals, I would go so far as to say they both ARE Homosexuals.
I dare them to try to sue me for that, since both of them think that being a homosexual is a good and noble thing. So by saying they are both homosexuals, I am (in their twisted world) complimenting them on their sexual preference and giving them both credit for being noble.
Hey Romney, come out of the closet! So some Pride!
I believe so, but not in the Mormon church. See post 10 for possible differences.
A vote for 3rd party is a vote for the horror that is Barack Hussein Obama. -I’m willing to live and let live. If a man/woman is bent upon trying to have warped sex with their own kind, on being filthy; I am ready to LET THEM BE FILTHY STILL - without being bothered.
I’m not voting for Obama, even in a back door way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.