I was watching either Discovery or NatGeo today and they had a show called Conspiracy Theory or something and it focused on the bombing of the Murrah building. They interviewed Gen. Partin and he disputed the one bomb theory. The show re-created the bombing, based on what McVeigh said he did and the debris placement and blast hole were different. They re-did the blast by rearranging the barrels of fertilizer and it created the blast pattern at the federal building and debunked what Gen. Partin had said. Setting all that aside, why would McVeigh lie about the configuration of the barrels in the van? McVeigh originally said he configured the barrels in a T shape, with one row of barrels at the front of the van and a single row in the center of the van to the back door. That gave the incorrect blast pattern and shallow hole.
The van had nothing to do with bringing the building down.
McVey was a nut case, and nothing he said would be worthy of consideration.
The debunkers are very much part of “cooling the mark.” (the “Mark” being the American public)
The goings-on in the basement of the Murrah building have been revealed in some detail by BATF operatives that were later discarded. The statements that were made by local officials on that morning BEFORE the blast were the most revealing.
Air is a lousy shock coupler and the force decreases by an inverse cube, so those columns should not have failed if the truck was the sole explosive in the equation.