Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyers From Suits Against Big Tobacco Target Food Makers
The New York Times ^ | August 18, 2012 | Stephanie Strom

Posted on 08/19/2012 7:20:33 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Don Barrett, a Mississippi lawyer, took in hundreds of millions of dollars a decade ago after suing Big Tobacco and winning record settlements from R. J. Reynolds, Philip Morris and other cigarette makers. So did Walter Umphrey, Dewitt M. Lovelace and Stuart and Carol Nelkin.

Ever since, the lawyers have been searching for big paydays in business, scoring more modest wins against car companies, drug makers, brokerage firms and insurers. Now, they have found the next target: food manufacturers.

More than a dozen lawyers who took on the tobacco companies have filed 25 cases against industry players like ConAgra Foods, PepsiCo, Heinz, General Mills and Chobani that stock pantry shelves and refrigerators across America

The suits, filed over the last four months, assert that food makers are misleading consumers and violating federal regulations by wrongly labeling products and ingredients. While there has been a barrage of litigation against the industry in recent years, the tobacco lawyers are moving particularly aggressively. They are asking a federal court in California to halt ConAgra’s sales of Pam cooking spray, Swiss Miss cocoa products and some Hunt’s canned tomatoes.

“It’s a crime — and that makes it a crime to sell it,” said Mr. Barrett, citing what he contends is the mislabeling of those products. “That means these products should be taken off the shelves.”

The food companies counter that the suits are without merit, another example of litigation gone wild and driven largely by the lawyers’ financial motivations. Mr. Barrett said his group could seek damages amounting to four years of sales of mislabeled products — which could total many billions of dollars.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitobaccoscam; bigfood; bigtobacco; bullystate; donbarrettscammer; lawsuits; nannystate; scam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2012 7:20:37 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084; SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; traviskicks; bamahead; CSM; ...

They don’t want us buying Hunts canned tomatoes until the labeling meets their specs? Is that it?

Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 08/19/2012 7:24:44 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Consumers like Christine Sturges, one of the plaintiffs in a suit against ConAgra, has gluten allergies and reads labels vigilantly.

When she heard about a lawsuit involving the Pam cooking spray, she took a closer look. “There was nothing scary on it, just this innocuous word, ‘propellant,’ ” said Ms. Sturges, a hairdresser from Los Gatos, Calif.

After digging deeper, she learned that “propellant” included petroleum gas, propane and butane. “I’d been spraying that on muffin tins to make muffins for my grandchildren — oh my God!”

So did Pam cooking spray make her or the grandkids sick? If not, what are her damages?

3 posted on 08/19/2012 7:42:32 PM PDT by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The same lawyers?

I’m shocked I tell you,really shocked.


4 posted on 08/19/2012 7:45:01 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

I can see both sides of the coin here. On one hand I hate all the crazy lawsuits and the government getting involved to pass even more crazy laws. On the other hand I want to know what’s in the food I buy. I have a hard time believing that, using Pam as an example, there couldn’t be some long term effects from consuming petroleum, butane, etc., even in small quantities. There’s warning about inhalation of gasoline fumes causing cancer at the gas station, why not be clear that the same ingredient is in something that’s meant to be eaten.

The food companies also seem to be spending an awful lot of money to hide the fact that they’re using genetically engineered foods in their products. Whether you, or anyone else, agrees with the reasons I don’t want to eat the GM foods, I think it’s proper to include the info in the ingredients list and let me make my own decision.


5 posted on 08/19/2012 7:56:28 PM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl

The propellants evaporate immediately at room temp, much less the oven........


6 posted on 08/19/2012 8:10:44 PM PDT by Red Badger (Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’ve used PAM ever since it first came out. I think it’s healthier to oil a pan with PAM rather than the old Crisco we used to use.


7 posted on 08/19/2012 8:21:58 PM PDT by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
“I’d been spraying that on muffin tins to make muffins for my grandchildren — oh my God!”

Uh, dumb lady? I assume you were screwing the football team and missed chemistry, but all those things are going to be in gas phase as soon as they get outside the can, so you don't have to add another ingredient to the recipe for your muffins. [facepalm]

You know, cases like this make me think there should be minimum intelligence/knowledge qualifications for jurors in lawsuits like this. Joe Sixpack might sit there and say "OMG, they're feeding us propane? Yuck! Give her a hundred mill!"

8 posted on 08/19/2012 8:23:57 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: basil

Cheaper to buy a spray bottle from the dollar store, fill it 3/4 full with olive or cooking oil, 1/4 with grain alcohol. Works really well Android is much cheaper.....


9 posted on 08/19/2012 8:25:18 PM PDT by Red Badger (Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Great hint! I’ll try it.


10 posted on 08/19/2012 8:39:34 PM PDT by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I think it's a crime that lawyers walk away with such huge paychecks from class-action lawsuits . Pay them for their work, yeah, but "hundreds of millions of dollars"?

I have to take Synthroid and saw a suit against its makers years ago. If I joined the suit and won, I'd get one months worth of the drug free. The lawyers would get millions. I declined.

11 posted on 08/19/2012 8:40:26 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

Android = and.
Stupid Autocomplete on tablet.......


12 posted on 08/19/2012 8:42:15 PM PDT by Red Badger (Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: basil

You may have to adjust the oil/alcohol content according to the bottle’s sprayer ability to pump thick liquids through its orifice........


13 posted on 08/19/2012 8:45:07 PM PDT by Red Badger (Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


14 posted on 08/19/2012 8:54:33 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
After digging deeper, she learned that “propellant” included petroleum gas, propane and butane. “I’d been spraying that on muffin tins to make muffins for my grandchildren — oh my God!”

So...what?

Did she spray the Pam directly into her grandchildren's mouths?

If so, how were they damaged?

Would she not cook anything over a propane flame?

Would she not chill a can of beer by spraying propane on it?

I assume she would never flick her Bic if it were butane-fired?

Is firing up the charcoal grill with lighter fluid totally out of the question?

Are only hysterical women qualified to launch lawsuits?

15 posted on 08/19/2012 9:01:27 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Mainly. I don’t want it to explode in skillet!


16 posted on 08/19/2012 9:01:27 PM PDT by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: basil; Huntress

They’re suing over whether the companies are following FDA labeling regulations. It’s got nothing to do with whether the foods are safe or not.

If the lawyers get away with this, food prices will skyrocket.


17 posted on 08/19/2012 9:11:17 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl
I have a hard time believing that, using Pam as an example, there couldn’t be some long term effects from consuming petroleum, butane, etc., even in small quantities.

What makes you think you actually consume the propellant -- unless you spray the Pam directly down your throat.

Petroleum gas, propane and butane are gasses! They don't stick to the surface, like the oil does. They're simply used to physically propel the oil out of the can and toward the surface. The gasses enter the air...and quickly disperse and degrade.

All aerosol sprays have propellants! Be they insecticides, room air deodorants, paints, waxes, whatever. You've used all these things, right? And they're perfectly safe to use inside the house.

18 posted on 08/19/2012 9:11:59 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl

Don’t know much about chemistry, gases, and evaporation, do you? And “petroleum” isn’t one of the propellant gases, you made that up.

There is nothing harmful about GM foods that I am aware of, and you failed to note anything.

So why are you being all alarmist in ignorance?


19 posted on 08/19/2012 9:16:35 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl

you need to pay closer attention to time lines....is inhaling Gasoline fumes good for you????of course not....will it harm you??? yeah, probably 75 years after sticking your head in a gas tank. The American life span has been increasing for many years. Eventually, everything that you do will add to your demise but changing your way of life to include “being green”, eating tofu, buying an electric car (?) , championing windmills to produce electricity....won’t gain you 10 seconds of additional life.....so why PAY to do it???


20 posted on 08/19/2012 9:20:44 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson