Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

“Allowing the party chair to select someone who didn’t even run for the position this year smacks of GOPe-liteism.”

****

In this case, it is more a matter of name recognition, organization, contacts, and the ability to win. Primary losers don’t have an advantage over Talent, Ashcroft, or Bond when it comes to any of these regardless of ideology.

Had GOPe conspired to take Akin out, I would agree with you. Instead, this is full press damage damage control by the state and national party apparatus because Akin shot himself in the foot.

No one in the GOPe was sitting around expecting Akin to say something this terminally stupid that would open the doors for an alternate candidate.


22 posted on 08/20/2012 2:11:00 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Mitt has more views on an issue than he has pairs of magic underpants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: peyton randolph

Correct...apparently the NRSC had already allocated $5 million to help Akin that is now withdrawn - the race is written off if Akin stays in.


24 posted on 08/20/2012 2:12:46 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: peyton randolph
Had GOPe conspired to take Akin out

Have you NOT been reading the threads of those from Missouri to Washington telling Akin to drop out?

==

I maintain my contention -- Brunner and Steelman ran. The others didn't! Those others [Tenet, Bond, et al] don't deserve being selected to the position, regardless of the reason.
35 posted on 08/20/2012 2:25:36 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson