Letters point to 'Obama's real father'

WND ^ | 8/20/2012 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Fred Nerks]

I did NOT say I would NOT be posting any images, I wrote:

I’m not posting images to convince you of anything

Your english comprehension is woefully inadequate to carry on any further discussion. I'll continue to post as many images as want, but not for your benefit. There are others who read these posts.

IF YOU DON'T LIKE THEM DON'T LOOK!

[little jeremiah]

They’re so alike that it is quite remarkable. Chins are extremely like.

[little jeremiah]

Anyway, I'm done with this thread from last year.

Good. Bye!!!

[little jeremiah]

I just got called crazy on the “Obama is Gay” thread.

Funny how quickly the “Crazy” label gets tossed out. Alinsky.

[Fred Nerks]

I should know better by now, every time I present the obvious, someone slinks out of the woodwork and tries to kill the messenger. His father was also bi-sexual by a number of accounts. In other words, he didn't descriminate. And in the famous last words of the nameless shrew, according to some freepers:

At this point, what difference does it make...

[Spunky]

"They don't look anything alike, but they do have similar mannerisms."

"That's because Obama is imitating Malcolm X."

If you think they look nothing alike then I would suggest you get your prescription glasses changed.

You think he is just copying Malcolm's mannerisms, but consistent mannerisms cannot be maintained.

My brother had a son and he and his wife were divorced when his son was two years old. He was never raised around his father and when I saw him as a grown adult I couldn't believe how much his mannerisms were just like his father, my brother.

Oh, and you were the one who commented on MY posting from over a year ago and I haven't been on this thread since then, until you brought it to my attention.

[little jeremiah]

The snarking, sniping fools snark to get people to shut up.

Well, that doesn’t work with me! If I had good info to post that would be even better... I just try to carry messages and put signs up that say “Hey, look! This is important!”.

:-)

Illegitimi non carborundum

[Greenperson]

In my opinion, the photos of the model are actually photos of two different women. In some of the photos alleged to be Stanley Ann Dunham, she clearly does NOT have crossed front teeth. Those photos also show the woman with a longer chin and curlier, more closely cropped hair, than seen in the photos that resemble the porn model with the crossed front teeth. Since FMD was “into” this, it’s likely that he used the same stage props for all of his models, meaning: That’s why you see the same shoes, earrings, clothing. They’re props shared by his models.

[Fred Nerks]

I very much doubt FMD ever had any 'models' - if you read the most recent post to his blog by John Ray, you'll see where he once again attempts to explain how he came across the images.

JOHN RAY BLOG LINK.

He maintains they were sent to him by an anonymous person...who thought the model looked like Stanley Ann Dunham. It's long ago been shown the images he posted of that model appeared in exotic magazines in 1958. Lots of them. He started the entire fiasco, and now refuses to accept that posting the images all over the web didn't confirm her identity.

Nothing ties her to Frank Marshall Davis except the vivid imagination of John Ray's anonymous correspondent and subsequently the fraud, Joel Gilbert.

In 1958 when that girl was posing, Frank Marshall Davis was living in Kahili Street with his wife and four children. And Stanley Ann Dunham was still in high school.

The only difference between these images is that one of them is tinted. That's four times the same girl. The photographs were taken in the same room, with the same furniture, and in his attempts to tie the model and Stnaley Ann Dunham together visually, Gilbert shows a composite of the teeth of the model and Stanley Ann Dunham:

You might be able to ignore that her eyes and her crooked little nose are totally different, but you can't ignore the teeth that the model had...which were crooked at the front, and Stanley Ann Dunham's were NOT when she was 16, in the photo supplied by Maxine Box to Getty Images, that Gilbert used.

[little jeremiah]

It’s weird how myths start. There is not a pinch, shred or atom of evidence that the photos of the “exotic” model have anything to do with either FMD or SAD.

Only in the rotten imagination of people with agendas, and then it became a myth that people somehow for some reason believe in.

It’s all a huge Nothing. Other woman, other photographer, some other location.

Corsi was a fool to give any of it credence, and Gilbert was merely making yet another mockumentary. I wonder if anyone paid him to make it.

[Fred Nerks]

The wish to believe FMD and Stanley Ann Dunham were lovers has an ugly old man, older than her own father, in bed with a girl who was still in high school and hadn't set foot in Hawaii when the photographs of the model were taken by heaven knows who or where and published in 1958... I really thought that exposing the ridiculous teeth-are-the-same BS would show what garbage Gilbert was up to. But no, the lie really did get halfway 'round the world while the truth was getting its shoes on... I'm amazed. It's an illusion. Maybe we should toss Gilbert in the river; if he floats, he's honest, if he sinks, he's guilty, and if he can swim, then he's a genuis.

DON'T TAKE ANY NOTICE OF THE EVIDENCE.

[Fred Nerks]

FOR THE RECORD:

Gilbert says that over one million copies of his film were mailed to voters in Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, New Hampshire and Colorado in the time leading up to the 2012 United States presidential election. He refused to disclose who funded the film’s distribution, and a report by The Daily Beast pointed out that there was no way to verify the numbers claimed by Gilbert.[3]

Two of the fetish photos in question were actually printed in issue 23 of the magazine Exotique, which was published in early 1958.[5] At that time, Ann Dunham was only 15 years old, and was living in Mercer Island, Washington.[6] The Dunham family did not move to Hawaii until the summer of 1960.[6]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreams_from_My_Real_Father

Exotique had no nudity, pornographic content, or even sexually suggestive situations. Nevertheless, much like fellow publisher Irving Klaw (a major influence on Burton) in 1957, Burtman would be targeted as a pornographer. He was relentlessly pursued by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (acting as a censorship agency then) and local law enforcement (who functioned in coordination with Postal Inspectors and the Catholic Church). Eventually, he was arrested, his magazines and materials confiscated, and brought to trial. This led to the demise of the magazine in 1959.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotique

[dennisw]

ping

[little jeremiah]

Yes, I remember the claim by Gilbert about all those DVDs mailed out. We wondered at the time if it were true, and if so, who funded it.

I never heard a peep about anyone getting one of those in the mail.

And even if NOTHING ELSE showed the FMD/SAD myth untrue, the single fact that the model was pictured in a 1958 magazine ruins the whole story.

[Fred Nerks]

whoops!

I accidently deleted an image: