Skip to comments.Democratic lawmaker called on to resign for having oral sex with boy, 17 (War on Boys)
Posted on 08/21/2012 1:29:57 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Democratic lawmaker called on to resign for having oral sex with boy, 17, in bushes at public rest stop after meeting him on Craigslist
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2191164/Kerry-Gauthier-Democratic-lawmaker-called-resign-having-oral-sex-teen-bushes.html#ixzz24DL9gNTt
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
anonymous sex with a minor in a public place=ok
inaccurate views on rape= public demonization.
Isn’t that what all the rats do at their conventions?
Why do you hate gay people, you homophobic HATER!!!!!
“anonymous sex with a minor in a public place=ok
inaccurate views on rape= public demonization. “
Yup you got it right. Gerry Studds showed that in 1983, followed by Barney Frank.
It’s thoughtcrime to say something about abortion, homosexual marriage, men’s reproductive rights, or anything “racist” like macaca, or “you would have made a good president”.
That UK Mail must be some piece of work.
theyre going to revoke his ‘Franking’ privileges.
“Really could care less what a Dim Minnesota State Rep does in the bushes.’
Welll...except that is a real resume booster for a Dem..he could eventually be shtupping boy pages in the White House...
I know, I know...I shouldn’t have said it.
if we’d just let them marry...they could come ‘out of the shadows’, I mean, bushes.
It says a lot about homosexual men that there favorite place for a date is the public toilet.
We need to focus on a conservative that is the devil incarnate for saying something NOT something trivial like having an uncontrollable compulsion to have sex with minors.
For crying out loud we sure are making it difficult for representatives to do their job any more!!
Most Dems are saying to themselves “so what did Gauthier do that was so bad?” I’m willing to bet a lot of money that millions of Dems are shaking their heads at this article (after they put down the chicken and the rubber hose), and wonder why Gauthier is in trouble.
Sure you’re on the right website?
Like who didn't see this coming?
You don’t care that an elected official has (at the very least) committed gross public indecency?
You’re suprised that a newspaper would report on it?
Either your State reps cavort around like the Emperor Caligula, or you’re appallingly disinterested in local government.
“Really could care less what a Dim Minnesota State Rep does in the bushes.
That UK Mail must be some piece of work.”
So... you finally decided to come out of the closet.
Yes... for about 14 years actually.
I mistook the headline to be about a US congressman.
Turns out it is a Minnesota state critter about whom I could care less and I am also puzzled why a UK rag would care about local pols in the US.
This is a conservative website. Caring about morality is one of the things that is done here, at least per my short tenure here and my observations. So, with all due respect, “caring less” about morality (versus legality that is) puzzles me at the least.
No actually, I thought I would stay in it until my wife and my 5 children and my 17 grand-children are all dead. Wouldn't want to embarrass them.
Even if I were in or out or never in, I still wouldn't care about a local pol's perversion, let his neighbors take care of him.
I do wonder why a UK rag would find a small time US pol's story of interest no matter what it may be.
As for you, I could care less about you either.