<=>See, when youre running against a moron who thinks that a 13 year old girl who is raped by a career crinimal should MANDATED by the state to have that career criminals baby...you really cant lose.
Abortion is murder. Rape, while a great conversation ender for the emotionally bound, does not in any way change that. If a rape results in a pregnancy, yes, the girl should end up having the child.
posted on 08/21/2012 5:39:20 PM PDT
(An Unreconstructed Georgian, Forever in Rebellion.)
“If a rape results in a pregnancy, yes, the girl should end up having the child.”
Amen brother. A rape isn’t made any better by a subsequent murder of a baby. And God is the one that put life in that baby, don’t forget
posted on 08/21/2012 6:38:59 PM PDT
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
Then killing someone breaking into your home is murder, right? And defending your country in a war by killing enemy soldiers is murder?
There are instances (as you see from above) where the taking of a human life is morally justifable. When a woman is inpregnated by forcible rape, the woman is just as much an "innocent victim" as the child. And given the extreme emotional damage done to a woman forced to carry a baby who was created through an act of violent violation (and the possible health consequences) she has, IMO, as much right to take that life to defend her own health and well-being as a homeowner has in killing an intruder into his own home. I also have no problem adding inpregnation as an aggravating factor in a rape and thereby moving it to a capital crime.
posted on 08/22/2012 8:06:45 AM PDT
by In Maryland
(Our rights come from nature and God, not government. - Paul Ryan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson