Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin erupts over Akin controversy (Audio)
The Daily Caller ^ | August 22, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 08/22/2012 11:32:39 AM PDT by Rufus2007

Republican Rep. Todd Akin decision to continue his campaign against Democratic incumbent Sen. Claire McCaskill wasn’t well received by many on the right, and perhaps one of the most exasperated reactions came from conservative talker Mark Levin.

Levin, the author of “Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America,” wanted his listeners to realize that there was more at stake to the race than just Todd Akin.

“Now I want you to step back, which is hard to do with these emotional things — step back,” Levin said. “In any other walk of life, if you can excuse something that is really stupid and insensitive you’ll go ahead and do it. But if the future of your business is at stake, if the future of a military operation is at stake, if the future of your country is potentially at stake — you don’t take the risk. You just don’t because the country is too important. Your children and grandchildren are too important.”

...more (w.video)...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2012; marklevin; toddakin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last
The Great One just the hammer down.

But for better or for worse, we're stuck with this guy.

1 posted on 08/22/2012 11:32:43 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Okay Republicans who think this way, then don’t come to me and lament Democrats who stand behind their jackasses like Reid, Pelosi, Biden, or Obama.

If we’re going to stand behind our idiots, don’t bother coming here to complain when the Democrats do it.

This double standard drives me crazy. Are we better than the Democrats or not? We continually say we are, and then we adopt their traits.

Then our leaders espouse this tactic, and we slap them on the back and call them wise.

Good grief!

There’s nothing wise about tolerating a man this foolish.


2 posted on 08/22/2012 11:41:58 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Americans want what Americans always wanted: Better lives for families; little government authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Obama's reaction...

3 posted on 08/22/2012 11:44:24 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Mark is wrong but then again he was soft on the FRC shooting too. Is this the new Romney GOP? When someone shoots themselves in the foot you don’t start shooting at them. The people squarely to blame for blowing this out of proportion is the GOP leadership which if they were putting the party first would resign and let someone better and more focused take us into NOV. The same crowd who was pushing Romney at any cost were the ones that started this disgusting pile on. Some of us will not forget.


4 posted on 08/22/2012 11:47:53 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Now lets return to our regular scheduled deprogramming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Mark ended the hour encouraging his listeners to donate the maximum amount allowed by law if Akin decided to stay in the race.


5 posted on 08/22/2012 11:52:03 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
blowing this out of proportion

You think what Akin said is being blown out of proportion????

I'm beginning to think all politicians are pieces of dirt. I used to think only 90% of them were.

6 posted on 08/22/2012 11:57:46 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

There is nothing wise or principled in nominating a person who can not get elected. Examples:

Joe Miller in AK
Hoffman in NY-23
Sharron Angle in NV
Christine O’Donell in DE
Buck in CO
JD Hayworth in AZ
George Allen in VA

All folks above are good conservatives, pro-lifers, and decent people. But they all lost because they are lousy
politicians. Nominating has cost us seats in congress and
dumping of Obamacare on the country. We do not need to add
Mr Akin to that list.

GOP can go to court and have him removed. It is never too
late. Sarah Palin is talking about a 3rd party run in MO
to defeat McCaskill.


7 posted on 08/22/2012 11:58:34 AM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will grow cancer in your body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
When was the last time a rat President or rat Presidential candidate asked a rat to drop his senatorial campaign against a weak republican candidate? Never.

If Mitt's demand to drop out isn't self-immolation by pubbies, it represents continuing GOP-E efforts to knock off conservatives. The GOP-E is happy to accept crumbs off the rat table. We are not.

8 posted on 08/22/2012 12:00:51 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I think that Rush explained his take on Akin very well, the guy's thinking, "OK, so I said something stupid, I erred, I committed a boo boo but I worked and slaved to get to this point and I'm NOT stepping aside because some moderates are demanding I do that;"

or, "let some of these other guys who are demanding I step aside, be the first to take the plunge, give away their spot because they put their foot in their mouth and said something out of character or made a total mistake, give up your spot, then come and tell me to do the same, you did!"

9 posted on 08/22/2012 12:03:56 PM PDT by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
I start out with the assumption it's a personality disorder that compels people to run for political office...it usually goes down from there. It keeps me from being disappointed. I keep hoping for pleasantly surprised.
10 posted on 08/22/2012 12:07:47 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
GOP can go to court and have him removed.

Please explain.

11 posted on 08/22/2012 12:09:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Rufus2007

Yes, he put the hammer down, the hammer of God. If America is not willing to stand up for a pro-life government, then the hammer of God will come down and next year is the 40th anniversary of Roe.

C’est La Vie! There is nothing, absolutely nothing new under the sun and God hates child sacrifice and immorality. So vote for romney and expect the consequences because it is what America wants, prosperity at the cost of innocent lives and depravity.


13 posted on 08/22/2012 12:15:55 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I’m beginning to suspect this Akin is on the take.


14 posted on 08/22/2012 12:17:46 PM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Audentis Fortuna Iuvat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
There’s nothing wise about tolerating a man this foolish.

Agree.

Our nation's economic survival stands on a precipice.

We need the Senate or Obamacare stands.

No margin for error - this is literally our last shot to save the country from a socialist program that will destroy the economy.

Heard this guy talking on Hannity and he is either a blundering fool or a willing democrat tool.

People are confusing a lack of support for this guy with a lack of loyalty. He's the one who displays a lack of loyalty to this country and our future by putting the Senate at risk.

15 posted on 08/22/2012 12:19:25 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
Yes, Mark, and you get on your public platform and go on and on about this, keeping the fire burning. You're making yourself as much to blame as you claim Akin is.

Good grief. They're as distracted by this as the Dems would like them to be.

16 posted on 08/22/2012 12:20:01 PM PDT by MEGoody (You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
There is nothing wise or principled in nominating a person who can not get elected.

The absolute minimum job requirement for a politician is winning an election. If you can't win an election, said person is politically worthless. There are lots of nice, principled, politically worthless people. It is stupid to nominate those people. If you've done so in error, it is important to fire said person and undue the damage.

The people that argue otherwise simply have no grasp on political realities. Maybe a sports analogy will work for the hard heads among us? Keeping Akin around for this Senate race would be like continuing to start a QB with a broken leg. Much as you may like said QB, much as he has been a loyal employee all these years, the guy now has a broken leg and can't get the job done. He no longer meets the minimum requirements for the job. Therefore you wish said QB well and bench them.

17 posted on 08/22/2012 12:20:55 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; All

I think the only double standard here is the GOP-e calling for Akin to step down after a single verbal misstep, while at the same time closing their eyes to Romney's entire career filled with assaults on conservatism. Do you know anything about Todd Akin? Take a look at his voting record (click).

I only got half way through the list. There's just too much good stuff to copy and paste here. This guy is one of us. Big Time. If this is an example of what the GOP-e wants to do away with in Congress, then we conservatives are on their enemies list. Looking at his voting history, I'll happily excuse a case of foot-in-mouth to get him in the Senate and holding that liberal Romney's "feet to the fire" as the Romney advocates here have "promised" to do.


18 posted on 08/22/2012 12:24:50 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
GOP can go to court and have him removed.

Yes, they can. And they can then put whoever they like in his place. Since the leadership will be picking the individual, you can bet it will be someone on good speaking terms with the establishment.

Sarah Palin is talking about a 3rd party run in MO to defeat McCaskill.

I don't think that would be successful. Sarah's endorsement for a 3rd party candidate may not be as powerful as some would like to think. It sure didn't help Steelman.

19 posted on 08/22/2012 12:25:19 PM PDT by MEGoody (You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Levin is nothing but a 2-bit drama queen on this as is Malkin, Hannity, Romney, etal. This moaning and bitching shows these small minded pricks for what they are!


20 posted on 08/22/2012 12:26:59 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
C’est La Vie! There is nothing, absolutely nothing new under the sun and God hates child sacrifice and immorality. So vote for romney and expect the consequences because it is what America wants, prosperity at the cost of innocent lives and depravity.
People are showing their true colors. But, by Todd sticking with the race, it gives anti-Akins the opportunity to reverse and get back on support for him. I hope they do.
21 posted on 08/22/2012 12:28:57 PM PDT by mlizzy (And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill? --MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“The absolute minimum job requirement for a politician is winning an election.”

Huh? A pol must know the outcome of an election before the election? Thanks, Plato.


22 posted on 08/22/2012 12:29:03 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

Akin’s biggest mistake was not realizing that the republican party is full of a bunch of back stabbing, bed wetting, hand wringing, nancy boy, hypocrites. Now he knows. If he wins he should make them come crawling back to him on hands and knees. They won’t mind, their use to being on their hands and knees.


23 posted on 08/22/2012 12:30:23 PM PDT by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Sarah Palin is talking about a 3rd party run in MO to defeat McCaskill.

Anybody But Obama makes Romney okay ... but a singular foot-in-mouth instance means running a 3rd party candidate against a conservative to split the vote and lose the seat? I am a huge Palin fan, but this would be a blunder on her behalf. Soliciting support for Romney while condemning Akin is inexcusable as Akin is by far the better conservative. No contest.


24 posted on 08/22/2012 12:31:54 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beandog

I agree...when the head of the party consist of unprincipled coward such as Romney and Co. there will be no one to cover the backsides of any lesser officeholder. You can bet that the RINOs will blame any losses on the Conservative Candidates!


25 posted on 08/22/2012 12:34:06 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Huh? A pol must know the outcome of an election before the election? Thanks, Plato.

No, but they must have a realistic chance to win. Akin no longer has that, therefore he needs to go. Simple as that. There is no use in sticking with a candidate who can't get elected when there is still avenues to replace him. There are plenty of other quality, pro-life candidates that can run instead of Akin and give us a realistic chance of taking this senate seat.

26 posted on 08/22/2012 12:34:25 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Very well said! I could’nt say it any better than your post.


27 posted on 08/22/2012 12:35:53 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will grow cancer in your body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Please see post # 19 in this thread.


28 posted on 08/22/2012 12:37:38 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will grow cancer in your body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

“The Unknown Comic”

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+unknown+comic&mid=E386EC33443BD8243782E386EC33443BD8243782&view=detail&FORM=VIRE4


29 posted on 08/22/2012 12:37:57 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Everyone needs to wake up......this is all smoke & mirrors! Start talking about Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) record! Bring the progressive/leftist actions to the top of the stack. Pro choice/pro-life/medicare/SS all detract from the the real issues that our country is going down the drain (financially).
Just today on the news (radio) the announcer stated that folks are (because of a poll) are saying the economy is improving. WHERE? Polls are so misguided and the questions asked are very misleading resulting in the DESIRED response, or they lie about the actual results for political effect.


30 posted on 08/22/2012 12:39:43 PM PDT by Fully Awake DAV (Navy Vet when homosexuality was not tolerated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Toricelli in New Jersey.

Anthony Weiner, Brooklyn.


31 posted on 08/22/2012 12:40:18 PM PDT by StevenFlorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

I agree with you on every count. That willing Democrat tool seemed obvious to me as well.


32 posted on 08/22/2012 12:41:01 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Americans want what Americans always wanted: Better lives for families; little government authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

If your not from Missouri just STFU.


33 posted on 08/22/2012 12:44:39 PM PDT by anchorclankor (From the main part of Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real; Longbow1969
I'll happily excuse a case of foot-in-mouth to get him in the Senate

I sincerely hope a majority of voters in Missouri feel the same way. If not, we've lost a critical Senate seat. Since he needed democrat crossover voters and democrat cash to get to this point, and since his poll numbers are sinking and his party financing is gone, it will be an uphill battle. His original comment was bad enough, but his subsequent behavior was even more off-the-wall. Pristine conservative voting record aside, he comes off as a really strange bird.

Longbow's analogy is apt. "Keeping Akin around for this Senate race would be like continuing to start a QB with a broken leg."

34 posted on 08/22/2012 12:45:27 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Why do you assume he cannot win?

He is conservative through and through. Missourians will decide, not the drive-by media. Why would an incoherent comment change anyone’s mind to not vote for Akin and for the hated McCaskill who is joined at the hip with the weakest, worst President since before Carter?

35 posted on 08/22/2012 12:47:57 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Oh, okay, then if someone who shares most of our views says something terrible, we’re supposed to overlook it. Got it.

Please spare me the GOPe conspiracy talk.

This bonehead opened his own mouth and inserted both feet.


36 posted on 08/22/2012 12:48:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Americans want what Americans always wanted: Better lives for families; little government authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: so_real

President Ronald Reagan famously said “I will vote for the most conservative candidate who can win”. I admire him more with each passing day on his wisdom. Most of all, he was a winner by attracting some democrat voters.

With no money, and MSM pounding him 24-7 and all MO republican leaders against him, Todd Akin has less chance of winning in November than I have of beating Tiger Woods in a golf match.

A loser in election HAS ZERO POWER. They can’t save a single baby being aborted by passing laws. They can’t cut a single dime out of government giveaways. They can’t prevent Obamacare becoming permanent. They can’t vote for a supreme court justice.

It does not matter how pure is their heart for conservative principles. Just ask Sharon Angle, Joe Miller, Hoffman, Christine O’Donell, Buck in CO, etc.


37 posted on 08/22/2012 12:51:30 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will grow cancer in your body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: StevenFlorida

Wrong states.


38 posted on 08/22/2012 12:53:24 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: anchorclankor
If your not from Missouri just STFU.

Since a single US Senator can block any legislation, all Senate races are national to begin with. Akin has expanded his reach beyond just the Senate and has managed to infect every race. So...go tell Akin to STFU and resign his campaign.

39 posted on 08/22/2012 12:58:31 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Oh, okay, then if someone who shares most of our views says something terrible, we’re supposed to overlook it. Got it.

Don't be intentionally obtuse. We don't overlook it. We ask for explanation first. Encourage a second point of view next. Apologize or request an apology when reasonable. Come to an understanding. Trust but verify the understanding is maintained. That's the conservative way. There's no conspiracy. The GOPe are quite vocal and ardent in expressing themselves. From their viewpoint, Romney's record is glorious and Akin's is contemptuous. No conspiracy there, just a very sad state of affairs among those who would be "leaders" of men.


40 posted on 08/22/2012 1:00:21 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa; All

To be honest, I owe Levin an apology. He took the opposite position of what I thought he had. I do agree with him, and I’m sorry I stated otherwise in error.

Iopscusa, I also agree with Malkin, Hannity, and Romney on this.

Not trying to spurn your note of agreement, but I did want to correct my error.


41 posted on 08/22/2012 1:01:13 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Americans want what Americans always wanted: Better lives for families; little government authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: anchorclankor
If your not from Missouri just STFU.

Request Denied.

42 posted on 08/22/2012 1:03:45 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I love the Universe, and it loves me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

In Alabama the State Democratic Committee is removing the Dem primary winner (Henry Lyon) in the race for Ala. Supreme Court Chief Justice and replacing him with Robert Vance to run against Republican primary winner and former Chief Justice Roy Moore. So it DOES happen on both sides.


43 posted on 08/22/2012 1:09:16 PM PDT by Jack Hughes (Te tibi delectant, me mihi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I know of no way to remove Akin. Could you site a specific law? Only Akin can withdraw his name. Even then he must petition the court. And SOS Carnahan can contest the decision of the court. There may be a major food fight coming. She does not play well with Republicans...


44 posted on 08/22/2012 1:15:23 PM PDT by donozark (Old Indian saying:Follow the cigar smoke, find the fat man there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Why do you assume he cannot win?

Really? You can't see by now that the guy is politically dead? Are you this politically tone deaf?

You can't go on TV and spout some ridiculous, half baked idea about women not getting pregnant via rape because their bodies magically shut down, and expect to remain a viable candidate in a statewide general election. And don't post me a bunch of garbage about how his statements are sorta, almost, kinda true. They are absolutely ridiculous. For a large scale example of just how ridiculous, one doesn't need to look any further than the conquering Red Army's rape of masses of German women and the thousands upon thousands of pregnancies that resulted from it. Akin himself has disowned his dopey theory, attributing it to some article he read in the past.

He is conservative through and through.

So is my neighbor. He's a great guy and terrific conservative. Unfortunately, much as we all like him, he can't win a statewide election for Senate. So we can go on liking him forever, just not as a candidate for Senate.

Missourians will decide, not the drive-by media.

You really don't know what is going on here do you? I mean, you haven't got a clue. Akin's statements were so utterly stupid that virtually every conservative will have to walk away from him. That means no money from the party or conservative PAC's. This means he can't compete. And yes, the drive-by media does, unfortunately, shape elections. There is a double standard. It's not fair, but it is what it is and until we've taken over the mainstream media we are playing under the left's rules. A conservative can't say the stuff Akin did and survive a competitive election. Maybe he could hold his own House district, but he isn't going to win statewide in Missouri now.

45 posted on 08/22/2012 1:21:27 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

I sincerely hope a majority of voters in Missouri feel the same way.

Not being from Missouri, I don't have a boots-on-the-ground feel for what goes on there. However, I would assume there is a 100% overlap in the drive to replace Akin with the drive to replace McCaskill. And as some of the electorate have supported Akin through this episode, there will be no split on the ticket in uniting pro-Akin and anti-McCaskill voters. I think the odds of gaining a Senate seat improve by accepting his mea culpa than by running a third party against him. If his voting record were not pristine, I would be happy to toss Akin to the curb. I am no fan of faux conservatives. But that does not appear to apply in this case.


46 posted on 08/22/2012 1:26:35 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: beandog
. . .the republican party is full of a bunch of back stabbing, bed wetting, hand wringing, nancy boy, hypocrites.

Yep, and that includes a surprising number of folks on FR. They blithely accepted Yoder's drunken, naked swim in Israel, even laughed about it. But this? Burn the guy at the stake.

By the way, just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that Yoder be ousted.

47 posted on 08/22/2012 1:35:15 PM PDT by MEGoody (You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

And the devil is in the details. The "who can win" part is a slippery slope adjective used as a tool by men to influence other men. It's like advocating 2nd Amendment rights with the exception of "assault" weapons. Well, who gets to define what "assault" means, and how often will that context be changed to suit an agenda? Isn't the purpose of all "weapons" to "assault"? I've changed my voting tune a bit over the years. "I will vote for the most conservative candidate ... period."


48 posted on 08/22/2012 1:35:49 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

IF you are going to “put the hammer down”, at least use the hammer of TRUTH!


49 posted on 08/22/2012 1:46:06 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa; holdonnow
Ping for rebuttal.
50 posted on 08/22/2012 1:49:56 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson