His comment about the relative likelihood of a raped woman conceiving was completely irrelevant to the question of an abortion option in the case of rape. COMPLETELY irrelevant. As in it was a non sequitur.
It is inconceivable to me why he brought it up or why people keep defending it, two days after he himself renounced it and begged to be forgiven for saying it.
It’s easy when you know they’re plan, divide and conquer. These people want us to hand the Missouri Senate seat over to the Democrats, look around and you’ll find them on threads wanting us to hand the Massachusetts Senate seat over to the Democrats, look around and you’ll find them on threads wanting us to leave the White house in the hands of the Democrats. It goes on and on. They always come at us from the right, cite our own faith against us. I’m making a list.
You’re right. Whether the prospect of conception is reduced or not, it is a proper civil function of government to protect innocent life. By what means, however, in a country that is pledged to pluralism?