Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

I agree the platform doesn’t mean much if it’s not followed up with action, and we can be pretty sure Romney won’t. But think of what a constitutional amendment could do if driven by the grass roots from the bottom up. It would force even Democrat presidents to enforce protections for the unborn.


23 posted on 08/24/2012 10:44:34 PM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
There are already two amendments to the U.S. Constitution that absolutely require the protection of every innocent person.

If they'll ignore those, they will ignore another.

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."


24 posted on 08/24/2012 11:00:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones
I agree the platform doesn’t mean much if it’s not followed up with action

The GOP platform has recognized the personhood of the child in the womb, and their protection by the Fourteenth Amendment, for 28 years.

No plank has been any more consistently and thoroughly ignored.

25 posted on 08/24/2012 11:04:23 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson