Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Campaign of Vilification
Townhall.com ^ | August 28, 2012 | Bill Murchison

Posted on 08/28/2012 8:51:59 AM PDT by Kaslin

As Lyndon Johnson told it -- or allowed it to be told in his name -- this Goldwater guy, if given half a chance, would blow up the world. In which case, why shouldn't the voters back in '64 not play it safe and keep LBJ in the White House?

Memories of the infamous Johnson television spot, with its daisy-leaf-plucking-about-to-be-incinerated-by-bad-Barry, cuddly, little girl, cause some of us old-timers to reach for the Maalox. (Small wonder that Barry would later say, talking of Lyndon, "Don't get me started on that SOB.") The debasement of presidential discourse wasn't the only public offense Johnson committed, but he sure set a vital precedent -- one that came to mind as Mitt Romney was expatiating on Barack Obama's "campaign of personal vilification and demonization."

I might in the foregoing sentence have written "President Obama's," rather than "Barack Obama's" campaign, inasmuch as a certain Barack Obama serves as president. The context puts one off just a bit from diligent assignments of respect. Presidents have an implied obligation to behave presidentially rather than in the manner of, well, Chicago community organizers. The obligation prevailed in politics for a long time. How many malcontents did President Washington slay with his tongue? Franklin Delano Roosevelt, to take a more modern example, might assail "economic royalists," but he laid off the moral bona fides, however he may personally have discerned them, of Herbert Hoover, Alf Landon, Wendell Willkie and Tom Dewey.

Barack Obama, you're no Franklin Roosevelt, Romney seems to be saying. More like a Lyndon Johnson perhaps?

Romney, the other day, mentioned "The Harry Reid attack. 'Oh, he hasn't paid taxes in 10 years.'... The attack about how Romney's responsible for this woman who died (years after Bain Capital closed a steel mill for which the woman's husband worked, costing the family their health insurance) ... and the vice president's comments (to a mostly black audience) about 'chains.' Really? The White House just keeps stepping lower and lower and lower ..."

I suppose an Obama partisan could -- probably has already -- accused Romney of "whining." Poor baby just can't take it, you know? Nor has the political trade some ethereal reputation to defend anyway for delicacy of expression. Oh, and this, too -- none of the stuff to which Romney alludes came out of Obama's own mouth; it issued from the mouths merely of people who support Obama. Not Obama's fault!

I guess that clears everything up. Except for two things:

The office of chief magistrate is supposed to command general respect. Respect, in a democratic setting, underlies voluntary obedience and compliance. A leader you don't respect receives -- at best -- grudging acknowledgement of his authority. It would seem in Obama's interest to give the best account he can -- consonant with the duty to campaign hard and effectively -- of his moral authority as chief magistrate. It would reinforce his capacity to govern.

But then point two, and this is more important. If presidents necessarily are human, with the usual run of human traits -- good, bad, indifferent -- the presidency as an institution transcends the lot. The presidency in a sense is all of us -- the sum of political experience and aspirations.

Modern people don't much like -- many actually hate and despise -- institutions, which have lives spanning generations, existing not by whim but by reason of prior and continuous arrangement. An institution is valued for the length of its whiskers.

The presidency of the United States is such an institution. It requires -- it demands outright -- a certain gravity, a certain dignity, as the occupant of the office goes about the fulfillment of his calling. A president without gravity or dignity, or if nothing else the outward appearance of both properties, debases and degrades. He wipes his shoes on the furniture, blows his nose on the tapestries. Institution? What institution?

What we have in such instance isn't a presidency, classically understood. We have instead a commercial office, a theater for ambition. Can we see what Romney is complaining about? A campaign of presidential vilification touches us all, debases us all. Don't feel it yet? Stick around.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012electionbias; barackobama; campaigns; dividernotauniter; lyndonjohnson; negativecampaign; obamalegacy; pravdamedia

1 posted on 08/28/2012 8:52:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for posting this, Kas!


2 posted on 08/28/2012 8:59:42 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...Bain Capital closed a steel mill for which the woman's husband worked, costing the family their health insurance)

Is this even correct?

My recollection of the story is that the husband lost "his" insurance when he lost his job, but that his wife still had insurance through "her" job.

3 posted on 08/28/2012 9:06:00 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s been said “They told me that if I voted for Goldwater we’d end up in a land war in Asia. I voted for Goldwater, and sure-enough, we ended up in a land war in Asia”.

Someone else here related that a neighbor in ‘64 voted for LBJ because he was “a man of peace”. Her son was KIA in VN a few years later.


4 posted on 08/28/2012 9:09:42 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

You’re welcome


5 posted on 08/28/2012 9:13:01 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, I would give the guy a break. It’s not like can run on his record now, can he?


6 posted on 08/28/2012 9:26:28 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oh, I would give the guy a break. It’s not like can run on his record now, can he?


7 posted on 08/28/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good article. Iirc, Bill Murchison is slightly older than dirt, the hills, and God, but even I - only 46 - remember when we had a President whom I didn’t think was absolute trash.

Maybe those days will come again. Mitt Romney isn’t my idea of a rock-ribbed conservative by any means, but at least he’s not on the record as eagerly anticipating the day when his daughters will have taxpayer-funded abortions.


8 posted on 08/28/2012 9:51:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Now a hit television series starring Judi Dench!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson