Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Light goes out for incandescent bulbs (in Europe)
EurActiv ^ | Published 31 August 2012; updated 03 September 2012 | Leo Hickman for the Guardian, part of the Guardian Environment Network

Posted on 09/03/2012 9:07:01 AM PDT by Olog-hai

After more than a century lighting up the world, the switch will be flicked off across the EU for the final time on incandescent bulbs on Saturday as the phased ban on their sale is completed.

From 1 September, a European Union directive aimed at reducing the energy use of lighting means that retailers will no longer be allowed to sell 40-Watt and 25-Watt incandescent bulbs. Similar bans came into effect for 60-Watt and 100-Watt incandescent bulbs over the past three years. The restrictions are predicted to save 39 terawatt-hours of electricity across the EU annually by 2020.

Earlier this year, the UK government said the ban would bring an "average annual net benefit" of £108 million ($172 million) to the UK between 2010 and 2020 in energy savings. But the phase-out of incandescents has been met with resistance by some users who say replacement technologies, such as CFLs, halogens and LEDs, do not perform as well. Despite the substantial long-term financial savings promised, the higher upfront price of replacement bulbs has also been criticized by those opposing the ban. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euractiv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: dhs12345
Think about this every time I have to flush a toilet twice maybe three times.

And get a plunger to unclog it, even though I barely used any toilet paper.

21 posted on 09/03/2012 9:58:24 AM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

“The Buck Stops Here.”


22 posted on 09/03/2012 9:59:03 AM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

It would not have survived a 0bama veto even if it managed to get through the Senate.


23 posted on 09/03/2012 9:59:40 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

100 watters are verboten here (USA) but you can still get 75 watt incandescents at Home Depot etc. But 75 watters will be banned come Jan 1st so stock up

I notice that HD has mercury based incandescents 100 watts illumination rating but done with 75 watts of electricity so they get the green fascist stamp of approval. The rip off price is 2 for 4$


24 posted on 09/03/2012 10:04:59 AM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
It would not have survived a 0bama veto even if it managed to get through the Senate.

I understand that, but what is the point of having an opposition if you're not going to oppose anything?

Stand and be counted, I say.

25 posted on 09/03/2012 10:05:32 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ShovelThemOut

The reason that the new washing machines do not clean is not their fault. It’s the fault of the new phosphate free detergents.


26 posted on 09/03/2012 10:11:08 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Europe is failing as usual with any nations that adopt communists like manifesto.


27 posted on 09/03/2012 10:13:00 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Every technology has a problem. The magnetic induction systems radiate RF like a banchee. Being a ham radio operator, this is particularly NOT A GOOD IDEA. This is one of the reasons that this technology hasn’t caught on.


28 posted on 09/03/2012 10:19:44 AM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

As a side note - after reading the wikipedia page on same, this technology also uses Mercury.

No free lunch.


29 posted on 09/03/2012 10:23:42 AM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

“Stand and be counted, I say.”

“Stand and deliver” is what the nannystate says.


30 posted on 09/03/2012 10:37:58 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Hopefully when we get some cooler thinking people in the White House, they will throw this damned ban on incandescent light bulb crap out the window.
31 posted on 09/03/2012 10:39:26 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Where Liberty dwells, there is my Country. - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Let’s see, it’s against the law for my 90 mother-in-law with macular degeneration to purchase light bulbs that are sufficiently bright enough for her but we are encouraged to ‘save the planet’ by purchasing electric cars which use electricity approx. equivalent to 15 100W bulbs burning 24 hrs/day. This is California, of course it makes sense!! It’s all about what seems like a good idea.....


32 posted on 09/03/2012 10:46:06 AM PDT by TMD (Behind enemy lines.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I've used CFL's for a long time, but really, they are only good in certain application. Places where they might be used for extended periods of time (outdoor night lighting), and places where any extended life might be a relief (hard to reach bulbs). But anywhere that you are going to have constant on and off cycles is a not a great idea, like a bathroom. For us southerners, the lower heat output of CFL's is a nice side benefit too.

I plan on stocking up on incandescents too. For some if not most applications, they just make more sense.

33 posted on 09/03/2012 10:46:49 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

If there was a point to your comment, I missed it completely.

I am in no way a nannystater.


34 posted on 09/03/2012 10:47:25 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ShovelThemOut
You can hardly find a washer with an agitator anymore! (I know, there’s one in the WH)

I had no idea Michelle does her own laundry. Or were you referring to Barack?

35 posted on 09/03/2012 10:48:21 AM PDT by Bernard ("He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else' - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Let the smuggling begin!


36 posted on 09/03/2012 10:52:12 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“The restrictions are predicted to save 39 terawatt-hours of electricity across the EU annually by 2020”

According to wikipedia, present annual consumption of electricity in the EU is 3,000 terawatt hours.

Thus the projected savings, in eight years, amounts to 1.3% of present consumption.

Whereas according to IAEA, consumption will increase: “projected primary energy demand growth of 1.7% per year.”

The projected savings eight years out do not amount to more than the projected year over year increase for a single year.

The light bulb mandate has very little to do with conservation, and everthing to do with control.


37 posted on 09/03/2012 10:53:20 AM PDT by ThirdMate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As for the “environmentalists” and politicians who forced this law, their bulbs have been dim for decades.


38 posted on 09/03/2012 10:59:36 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Why are all the new bulbs at least 10x as much? Any dumbass knows the answer to this question. It has nothing to do with conserving energy IMO and more about greasing palms.


39 posted on 09/03/2012 10:59:59 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Why are all the new bulbs at least 10x as much?

They're not.

I've switched to a Walmart brand "Lights of America" (Chinese made, unfortunately). More lumens than the 60 watters I was buying. Uses 14 watts (I measured it). Costs about a dollar a bulb. Dunno about life yet - claim is 10000 hours but I only switched last December.

Tried some a few years ago - they lasted from 20 seconds to 20 hours, but they all died. These have lasted since Dec with no casualties.

40 posted on 09/03/2012 11:21:21 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson