Skip to comments.Obama lawyer warned against certifying eligibility
Posted on 09/03/2012 7:39:43 PM PDT by tsowellfan
click here to read article
Guess they’re serious about the ineligibility of BHO. Thought the birther thing was dismissed.
Note: Not that I’m dismissing it...
It would be a wonderful thing if something actually came of this, but all of us know nothing will happen!
Of course, Klayman’s letter will be completely blown off by the DNC and even more so by the MSM. Still.....he’s dead on, and I still harbor the fantasy of seeing Obama and countless others frog-marched to jail to await trial over this massive fraud perpetrated upon the United States of America and her citizens.
It’ll never happen....but a man can still dream.
There’s more than one way to skin a Rat!
Well, this could be a real test, if the USA is a country of Constitutional Law or a country ruled by tyrants. We’ll see won’t we.
Huffing and puffing, but in the end just blowin' smoke.
Going after individuals could prove far more effective than amorphous organizations like the DNC. People can go to prison.
Keep an eye on the “Certificate of Nomination” a.k.a. “eligibility letter” that will be sent to the Office of Elections of the State of Hawaii just after the Democratic Convention.
If there are discrepancies between the text of the letter sent to Hawaii compared to that sent to the other states as there was in 2008, that is open grounds for a eligibility lawsuit. I know we’ve been through all this before, but with the public alerted by events of the past 4 years, the results in court in 2012 may be different.
Good! I hope he sends John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid a strong message too.
Maybe why there are rumors “The Bath-House Barrys” are buying an abode in Hawaii...
For the first time ever somebody asked and got a legally-binding response from Hawaii regarding Obama’s birth record there. Onaka’s response was that Obama does not have a legally-valid birth certificate in Hawaii.
This should be plastered on the front page of every newspaper in the country. The question we have all been asking has finally been answered.
If people pass Obama along just like they did last time they will have to commit crimes in the process, because they have no excuse to think Obama has qualified, when Hawaii itself has said they don’t have anything legally-valid for him.
THe question is, did they mean the headline to be intentionally misleading, or was it just sloppy?
“Obama Lawyer Warned” — sounds like an Obama lawyer is the one doing the warning.
But as the story says, the Obama attorney WAS warned, not doing the warning. Changes the whole tone of the article.
"when I move into the White House the new attorney general will initiate a thorough and complete investigation in order to clarify to the American people that Barack Obama was indeed eligible and was the legitimate President of these United States. Such an investigation is only fair to not only President Obama and his legacy but also to the American people. I'm sure that the results of this investigation will provide proof that President Obama was indeed legitimately the President of the United States.
However, if by some chance the accusations turn out to be correct, there is a promise that anybody in Congress whether they be republican or democrat will be legally held accountable and justice will be served for any wrong doing and illegal activity. Let that be a warning to the leaders of Congress who have taken the oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America."
This message alone will lift the hair on the back of the necks of those failing to do their job. These leaders have received packages and copies of affidavits so they do know whats being alleged. These candidates and our congressmen need to know that this is no longer a missing Birth Certificate issue but forgery and also possible fraud regarding the social security number(s) of Barack Obama.
This message will most likely prompt some to start taking action so that when the new President comes in they will not be caught with their pants down and possibly face jail time.
Thanks for the ping!
Subtitle: ‘For any party official to do so would be to perjure him or herself’
I was not misled.
mmm mmmm mmm Between Barock and a hard place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.