Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

A grain reserve would be invaluable during droughts

“This raises the question whether a strategic grain reserve needs to be established, much like the strategic petroleum reserve, for use in times of major supply disruptions. The United States maintained such reserve stocks of grains in the past. Over time, these grain reserve programs were discontinued largely because of cost and improved market efficiency. If future supply disruptions attributable to drought become more frequent, they may affect not only
livestock production but human food consumption as well. Some type of a grain reserve may make sense in this changing environment.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-grain-reserve-would-be-invaluable-during-droughts/2012/08/12/0bb21f72-e17d-11e1-89f7-76e23a982d06_story.html

USDA: No strategic grain reserves…they sold them!

http://ppjg.me/2010/11/12/usda-no-strategic-grain-reserves-they-sold-them/

Tons more links if you care to look.


186 posted on 09/04/2012 11:14:02 AM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Kartographer

The trouble with looking at a single facet of American Agribusiness is that it will invariably look bizarre, and this is the case here.

W. Bush is somewhat to blame for the idea of centralizing food production and distribution. He was very big into the idea of a North American Union, the Plan Pueblo Panama, FTAA, the trans-Texas corridor, and other such nonsensical pipe dream indulgences.

However, that being said, all the second link did was to assert that one part of the system had been bled dry. And this is accurate. But that does not mean that the same has happened to its parallel systems.

(And truthfully, he killed his credibility at the end by saying, “As for bio-terrorism……considering we have more than 700 bio-weapons labs cris-crossing the country, its pretty safe to say that should we have a bio weapon attack, it will probably originate from a city near you.”)

Bottom line: Right now, almost 40% of our corn crop goes to ethanol.

The USDA site also says that 4.1% of U.S. corn (2008) goes for high fructose corn syrup. That means that since 29.9% of all U.S. cropland harvested was planted in corn in 2007, 1.2% of all U.S. cropland harvested in 2007 went for high fructose corn syrup. That’s only slightly less than the 1.5% of U.S. cropland devoted to vegetables or the 1.6% of U.S. cropland devoted to [fruit] orchards.

All the US has to do is stop converting corn into ethanol, and in short order, we are up to our eyebrows in corn.


197 posted on 09/04/2012 11:55:23 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson