Skip to comments.Left Behind (Obama has turned his back on us liberals. So why aren't we screaming about it?)
Posted on 09/07/2012 11:03:09 AM PDT by nickcarraway
In May 2009, Barack Obama delivered a speech in Prague about global threats that required, he said, "action coordinated across borders." This not-so-ringing phrase he intended to apply to "a global economy in crisis, a changing climate, the persistent dangers of old conflicts, new threats and the spread of catastrophic weapons." To address the global economy, he called for "investments to create new jobs ... [and] a change in our financial system, with new rules to prevent abuse and future crisis. "We must confront climate change," he said, "by ending the world's dependence on fossil fuels, by tapping the power of new sources of energy like the wind and sun, and calling upon all nations to do their part." He declared that the United States would lead the world away from nuclear weapons and "seek a new treaty that verifiably ends the production of fissile materials intended for use in state nuclear weapons." Most of these imperatives emanated from an agenda of the American left -- albeit one that was not inclined to give him much credit for these words.
When President Obama spoke at Cairo's Al-Azhar University one month later, much of his rhetoric, again, derived from the American left. He deplored colonialism and the former habit of treating Muslim-majority countries as "Cold War proxies." (Later in the speech, he specifically deplored the fact that during the Cold War "the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government.") Addressing Islam, he invoked "common principles -- principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings," along with the rights of women. He declared that the United States would hold to a presumption against the use of force, quoting Jefferson: "I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach
(Excerpt) Read more at foreignpolicy.com ...
Cult of personality. He could literally kick them in the teeth, and they wouldn’t bat an eye.
Why is Todd Gitlin still walking around alive and free?
On the other had, if the GOP nominee came with liberal proposals, the GOP would abandon him\her....oh wait a minute...nevermind.
Hillary’s problem is triangulating a position away from the person she originally had slotted for her VP.
Going to Indonesia during the Rat convention was part of this effort, as well as never coming back to the US during her 4 years lighting the world on fire as SoS.
Now, with this kind of essay above, her policy wonks are squirming out an argument space for her, like someone straining with constipation.
Hillary Clinton, the consitipated block that refuses to move, decade after decade, making fools out of every supporter she ever had.
Where else are they going to go?
As a ‘small government’ conservative, I can relate given the insane spending and foreign adventurism of the second President Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.