Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bounce! - Rich Galen
Mullings ^

Posted on 09/09/2012 6:07:19 PM PDT by Perdogg

Let's don't sound like some dopey pundit on cable TV reading the talking points you got in an email and pretend that Barack Obama did not get a bounce out of his convention.

He did. But not as much as the Barack Obama campaign might have wanted.

On August 27 - the day the GOP convention was supposed to have started, the RealClearPolitics.com average of national polls had Obama leading Mitt Romney 46.8 percent to 45.7 percent. That is a difference of 1.1 percentage points.

As of last evening, the five national polls that were current showed Obama with a net average advantage of 3.0 percentage points.

(Excerpt) Read more at mullings.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls

1 posted on 09/09/2012 6:07:21 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LS; SoFloFreeper

ping


2 posted on 09/09/2012 6:08:04 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

RCP has 0 up by an average of 1.8, not 3 points.


3 posted on 09/09/2012 6:14:19 PM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I don’t understand why everyone is getting flipped about this.
I expected it.

As Andrew Breitbart would say.....So?


4 posted on 09/09/2012 6:15:19 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Romney scares me. Obama is the freaking nightmare that is so bad you are afraid to go back to sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

That could be enough to win in November.....with the election so being so close. I am thinking that Obama’s chances get better from here on out, just my feelings....


5 posted on 09/09/2012 6:17:05 PM PDT by yield 2 the right (2012, the election year that stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yield 2 the right

Why? You are a conservative I suppose. Tell me logically not emotionally. I am an engineer, I deal with facts not theories.


6 posted on 09/09/2012 6:20:15 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yield 2 the right

If it’s close, there will be riots.


7 posted on 09/09/2012 6:21:14 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

SHOW ME THE NUMBERS IN SWING STATES,NOT THE NATIONWIDE AVERAGES!


8 posted on 09/09/2012 6:24:16 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If Obama's Reelected Imagine The Mess He'll Inherit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Exactly! What difference does it make if Obama is up by 20 points in CA or NY? That’s millions of people. He will win there no matter what.


9 posted on 09/09/2012 6:32:53 PM PDT by boop (It's not personal...it's strictly business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I don't even care about swing state percents unless I can see internal party ID numbers and make appropriate corrections. RCP averages are so much horse manure because of both oversampling of Dems and using Registered voter surveys in the average. Look at he internals of even the illustrious CNN poll. The difference between Regisered Voters and Likely voters is a margin of 8%! ThaT is not typical (probably 5% is closer to the truth.) But you get my point

In 2004, about a month from the election Rush Limbaugh mused, with Kerry ahead that the pollsters would start to move the numbers to reality the last week of the election... And that Bush would win...
10 posted on 09/09/2012 6:35:21 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yield 2 the right

Obama’s ahead, my foot. Lots & lots of people called by pollsters are lying through their teeth so they won’t be labeled as “racists”.

The MSM’s trying to carry Obama to the finish line. Worthless dishonest hacks!

):^[


11 posted on 09/09/2012 6:36:17 PM PDT by elcid1970 (Nuke Mecca now. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind. Deus vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: boop

if a pig had wings, it could fly. very little chance that the popular vote winner is going to lose the electoral college.


12 posted on 09/09/2012 6:36:36 PM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

EXACTLY!! I dont give a rats behind if Obama is up nationally..I want to know how he’s doing in Ohio, Wisconsin, PA, Florida, North Carolina, Colorado, and other swing states..the electoral college is what matters at the end, not how Obama is doing nationally


13 posted on 09/09/2012 6:36:50 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

“Tell me logically not emotionally. I am an engineer, I deal with facts not theories.”

Yep. It’s the knee jerk reaction that is prevalent on FR.

Look at the FACTS:

1. DNC. The RATS just completed their convention, of course Soetoro was going to get a bounce, the majority of which was from Clinton (not Obama). Clinton ain’t running for POTUS.

2. Scott Rasmussen (nor any other pollster) ISN’T a prophet. Again, another FReeperism is taking the word of Rasmussen as Gospel; it isn’t. He’s ONE polling outfit, ONE point of data. And as far as Rasmussen goes, he just had a poll that showed more Americans are registered GOP than in any poll his outfit has taken. So, all the new Republicans are going to vote for Obama? Don’t think so. Which Rasmussen poll are we to believe?

3. History. GHWB was behind Do-cucky by 17% in 1988. Ronald Reagan’s sitting VP was behind by a HUGE margin. How did that election come out again? Right...a Bush blowout.

I have the cache and history on my computer set to clean out cookies automatically and I can’t find the FR thread, but there was a thread regarding poll results and a FReeper had a brilliant observation/opinion. To paraphrase: The pollsters don’t want to show Obama losing this far out because the inner city “gimme” crowd is going to start freaking out en masse. Expect to see the unevenly balanced polling internals (the massive oversampling of RATS) until just before the election, so these pollsters can salvage something of their reputations.

The DNC just finished up, R2 has just begun spending their mounds of dollar$ in states like WI. The fight has just really started - it’s after Labor Day and both major parties completed their conventions.

I’m not saying not to be concerned, the fact that a POTUS like this bum is over 30% in any poll shows how far this country has slid, but unless an evil miracle happens, Obama is going down hard.


14 posted on 09/09/2012 6:38:37 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The Glove don't fit, but it's better than a burqa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Remember, Carter in early September 1980 had a comfortable lead over Reagan. But then came the debates, and in the end Carter got flattened at the polls in November 1980.

The debates MUST really worry Obama, because unlike taking on McCain in 2008, Obama doesn't have a good Presidential record to defend himself in the debates. Romney will clearly point out the very weak jobs recovery (with many workers no longer even looking for a job), the ballooning size of the Federal government and deficit, the economy-inhibiting income tax system, the disastrous US$787 billion stimulus plan from 2009, the issues of a "sugar rush" from the Federal Reserve doing quantitative easing, and too much pandering (very literally in a few cases) to countries not exactly friendly to the USA. And Obama speaking "off the cuff" can cause more problems, as we all so remember clearly from the "You didn't build that!" comment....

15 posted on 09/09/2012 6:41:42 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yield 2 the right

As long as they keep people like Eric Holder and Napolitano in hiding. All of 0bama’s toxic team members will be hidden for the next few weeks. Well, they CAN’T hide Biden!


16 posted on 09/09/2012 6:42:43 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I can not logically tell you why I feel Obama will win. Sorry....


17 posted on 09/09/2012 6:51:30 PM PDT by yield 2 the right (2012, the election year that stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

If it’s close, there will be riots.


That worries me too....hope not.


18 posted on 09/09/2012 6:53:53 PM PDT by yield 2 the right (2012, the election year that stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Obama’s ahead, my foot. Lots & lots of people called by pollsters are lying through their teeth so they won’t be labeled as “racists”.

I bought this notion in 2008. It didn’t work out so well. I believe this country has tipped. It’s dominated by people who no longer appreciate what was unique and special about it. They want guarantees from the government and will accept an otherwise mediocre existence. I’d love to be wrong.


19 posted on 09/09/2012 7:04:22 PM PDT by Jake8898
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jake8898

What were the polls claiming in 2010?

Pelosi was certain that the donks were going to hold the house...


20 posted on 09/09/2012 7:31:22 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jake8898

In 2008 Obama was an unknown angel of light & his opponent sucked. Now it’s Obama’s record that sucks.

It’s also four years later into the information technology revolution. Lying gets harder to do. The Demvention will be remembered by a Scripture quote: “before the cock crows thou shalt deny Me three times”.

Ain’t over yet. When the MSM declared the election over after Klintoon’s speech, that said in spades that it isn’t over ‘til it’s over. Have faith.


21 posted on 09/09/2012 7:35:53 PM PDT by elcid1970 (Nuke Mecca now. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind. Deus vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Obama is ahead and is a decided favorite to win. It really sucks, but it is true.

Romney got no bounce whatsoever out of his convention, Obama is getting a small one out of his. That sugests people still just don’t really like Romney.

Romney never comes close to 50% in the polls, Obama has been flirting with that mark and sometimes passes it. His ceiling seems higher.

While the Battleground polls do not show movement towards Obama yet, they will. Tracking polls pick up movement first because they are conducted most oftern. The less frequent state polls will take a while longer but they also will show Obama ahead in the coming days.

I wouldn’t begin to suggest that Romney’s task is impossible, but he is behind. He is a definite underdog, and he needs an inspired campaign from here on out, plus a little luck if he is going to win.

So far, none of those things have really occurred. He has some time, but not much.


22 posted on 09/09/2012 8:31:16 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

In 2010, the polls were saying that the Republicans were going to blow the doors off the dems. That’s what happened. Pelosi was merely cheerleading and no one believed her.


23 posted on 09/09/2012 8:34:55 PM PDT by Jake8898
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

SHOW ME THE NUMBERS IN SWING STATES,NOT THE NATIONWIDE AVERAGES!

Bingo, GSC. These are the states that will decide the outcome.


24 posted on 09/09/2012 8:39:09 PM PDT by Mountain Mary (The music from Jaws is playing in my head....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I’d like to see potential turnout in cities in swing states. It takes an awful lot of us backward hicks and evil greedy suburbanites to outweigh the juggernaut that is the city vote (to whence most of the gov’t “goodies” flow, and thus the most interested in growing the darn thing).


25 posted on 09/09/2012 8:44:18 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Spend the Money Now Rove


26 posted on 09/09/2012 9:01:25 PM PDT by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

They have got to reach these voters.

I recall 2008 Obama offices and posters were all over the cities - good neighborhoods and bad.

Haven’t been in many downtowns lately, but I’m not seeing the same presence. Looks like a spending opportunity, like you say.


27 posted on 09/09/2012 9:27:42 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
I've never seen a credible poll that has Obama's political "favorability" anything higher than the 40's.

Oh, some people may like him "personally", but his stewardship of the State has been a disaster on every level.

He can't run on his record, and I don't think "but you LIKE me" is going to cut it.

Frankly I've ALWAYS found him profoundly unlikeable. He's thin skinned, humorless, vindictive, petulant, and very anti-American.

28 posted on 09/09/2012 9:40:46 PM PDT by boop (It's not personal...it's strictly business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: boop

The problem is that if Romney can’t make himself more likable than Obama, people will just wind up voting for “The Devil They Know.”


29 posted on 09/09/2012 9:43:04 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The worst President the USA has ever had and he's 3 points ahead of the GOP’s best choice. The old guard GOP are killing me. WTH?
30 posted on 09/09/2012 11:03:59 PM PDT by trailboss800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
As Andrew Breitbart would say.....So?

Indeed. As my statistician husband would say, the difference is 'in the noise'.

31 posted on 09/11/2012 3:28:22 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson