Skip to comments.Smoking Marijuana tied to testicular cancer (2x risk)
Posted on 09/11/2012 8:00:21 AM PDT by GeronL
Reuters) - Young men who had smoked marijuana recreationally were twice as likely to be diagnosed with testicular cancer than men who have never used marijuana, according to a U.S. study. .....
"This is the third study consistently demonstrating a greater than doubling of risk of this particularly undesirable subtype of testicular cancer among young men with marijuana use," said Victoria Cortessis of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, who led the study.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
3rd study with same results.
Mass Darwin Awards
Didn’t seem to effect Willie Nelson
What a ridiculous study as presented.
If all the studies were conducted as this one is presented, I don’t know the researchers came to any conclusions whatsoever.
That’s just nuts.
Sounds like a south park episode where guys purposely get testicular cancer to receive medical marijuana...then bounce on said balls like kids on their hoppity balls.
This is medicine?
get a close look, did ya?
The war on drugs is over. It was over before it started. You folks didn’t learn from Prohibition.
Don’t whine as your personal freedoms are taken away daily as a result of this war. Don’t whine about Obama running guns to Mexican drug cartels. Don’t whine if the police dress and act like Palestinian terrorists.
Why does a scientific story turn into a debate about the war on drugs?
Pot either increases the risk of cancer or it doesn’t. It’s a scientific question, not a social one.
The story also said they found that cocaine use DECREASED the cancer risk. Does that mean they are calling for the legalization of cocaine? No, it just means they are stating the results of a scientific study.
The study isn’t calling for the outlawing (or legalization) of marijuana. It’s just stating a scientific finding: marijuana use increases the risk of cancer.
Is there something wrong with people having more information so they can make an informed decision?
There’s no high worth my boys.
If your 15 year has trouble getting out of bed in the morning or has toe jam, the QUACK at the Pot Shop (quacks working directly for the distributor- malpractice anyone?) will prescribe pot. ANYONE will get the prescription.
It’s all a scam.
Look at this another way...
Putting people in jail and being paid to take care of them is BIG BUSINESS. Prisons are becoming privatized, and just like in the Education Monopoly you need participants to make ot a profitable venture.
Understand that “prohibition” was first proposed to rid our country from “demon alcohol” and cure many societal ills. What it did was stimulate the desire as Americans hate being told what to do, and created a criminal class to provide the prohibited items.
When Prohibition was repealed the Government had a problem, what to do to keep all pf the Agents employed, it was in the middle of the depression. Peter Anslinger, the head of the agency at the time and others cooked up a new “demon”, first Cocaine crazed Negroes raping white women, and then reefer madness. Note they had NOT been identified as a problem when the focus was on Alcohol, but suddenly became so when repeal came
1937 At the two-hour Congressional hearing on July 10 that preceded passage of the Marihuana Tax Act, the American Medical Associations legal director, Dr. William C. Woodward, presents an inspired prophecy: Since the medicinal use of cannabis has not caused and is not causing addiction, the prevention of the use of the drug for medicinal purposes can accomplish no good whatsoever. How far it may serve to deprive the public of the benefits of a drug that on further research may prove to be of substantial value, it is impossible to foresee.
Voila, the Government had found it’s new demon, and if you look at it closely it was really a racially motivated scheme.
Prohibition creates a problem in many cases, and the solution in the Governments eyes is incarceration. I can back up a 26 ft U-Haul to virtually any liquor store in the USA and buy them out and all I will hear is “thanks, come again!” Did Alcohol suddenly change ot’s “nature” and become ok?
No, it was again legal and use dropped considerably after a time. The Government got tax revenue from it and the whole thing passed into history.
In my life I have known a lot of people who used and abused many things, and I will tell you personally I would rather deal with a pot smoker than a drunk or a pill popper any time any where.
So all of the snarky comments mean nothing to me, this is my personal experience over many years. The “studies” being brought out only serve to keep “reefer madness” on the front burner and acting as a vehicle to increase prison population.
Do some research and stop parroting old axioms, if you don’t like it don’t smoke it. And this last tidbit for all of the “tut tutters” who consider themselves so wise.
Over 200,000 Americans die each and every year from taking LEGAL prescription medicines provided by their doctor. When have you EVER heard of, as they said on Saturday Night Live, “Another Marijuana related death”
Choose your poison boys and girls
Just ask them how much they’re makin’ (money selling pot) or takin’ (using it to escape reality).
You just do not know what you are talking about, unless your state is that way.
Good information. Really wont matter some people are so misinformed and hysterical about cannabis it is laughable.
Maybe Marijuanas not the only thing theyre into.
A mental defective doesn't like reality. He MAKES A CHOICE. He spends all his time stoned. He contracts a cancer that gelds him or kills him, removing his commiecrat ass from the gene pool.
Win/win for the rest of us. (Bad news for Cheetos sales tho...)
Really? How much of it did you smoke?
Interesting that it appears you are saying people who use cannibals are mentally defective and you will be happy if they die from cancer.
And you really think they are the defective ones.
Ok, well just legalize it and the problem will eventually take care of itself.....
Or offer free pre-emptive “surgery” for pot smokers, win-win.
Oh, you’ve check his testicles?
Many medicines have harmful side effects - should we ban them all?
The adverse health effects from cigarette smoking account for an estimated 443,000 deaths, or nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the United States.
More deaths are caused each year by tobacco use than by all deaths from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, suicides, and murders combined.
Smoking causes an estimated 90% of all lung cancer deaths in men and 80% of all lung cancer deaths in women.1
An estimated 90% of all deaths from chronic obstructive lung disease are caused by smoking.1
Smoking and Increased Health Risks
Compared with nonsmokers, smoking is estimated to increase the risk of
coronary heart disease by 2 to 4 times
stroke by 2 to 4 times
men developing lung cancer by 23 times
women developing lung cancer by 13 times
dying from chronic obstructive lung diseases (such as chronic bronchitis and emphysema) by 12 to 13 times.
Smoking and Cardiovascular Disease
Smoking causes coronary heart disease, the leading cause of death in the United States.
Cigarette smoking causes reduced circulation by narrowing the blood vessels (arteries) and puts smokers at risk of developing peripheral vascular disease (i.e., obstruction of the large arteries in the arms and legs that can cause a range of problems from pain to tissue loss or gangrene).1,7
Smoking causes abdominal aortic aneurysm (i.e., a swelling or weakening of the main artery of the bodythe aortawhere it runs through the abdomen).
Smoking and Respiratory Disease
Smoking causes lung cancer.
Smoking causes lung diseases (e.g., emphysema, bronchitis, chronic airway obstruction) by damaging the airways and alveoli (i.e., small air sacs) of the lungs.
Smoking and Cancer
Smoking causes the following cancers:
Acute myeloid leukemia
Cancer of the cervix
Cancer of the esophagus
Cancer of the larynx (voice box)
Cancer of the oral cavity (mouth)
Cancer of the pharynx (throat)
Smoking and Other Health Effects
Smoking has many adverse reproductive and early childhood effects, including increased risk for
low birth weight, and
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).1,8
Smoking is associated with the following adverse health effects:
Postmenopausal women who smoke have lower bone density than women who never smoked.
Women who smoke have an increased risk for hip fracture than women who never smoked.
Scientists have found a few risk factors that make a man more likely to get testicular cancer. Even if a man has one or more risk factors for this disease, there's no way to know for sure what part those factors played in causing the cancer. Also, most men with testicular cancer do not have any of the known risk factors. Research in this area is going on.
I know two individuals that cured their testicular cancer with THC, in less than a week for one of them.
This article is just more BS from the Medical Mafia.
>> “Also, most men with testicular cancer do not have any of the known risk factors.” <<
This can be said for most cancers. “Risk factors” are in the bank account of the researcher in all liklihood.
They'll tell you "it doubles your risk", but nary a word about what that risk factor was to start with.
First it was because marijuana would make your white daughters run off with black jazz musicians.
Then it was marijuana made you psychotic.
Then they claimed marijuana makes you sterile.
Then, another US study said marijuana killed your brain cells. And the US government sprayed paraquat on Mexican pot fields to make sure that study came true.
And after that they tried to make men believe that smoking pot would make them grow female breasts.
And now, in addition to tits, our balls are all supposed to be dropping off.
Frankly, these lying POS are boring the flock out of me.
As a example, I offer any Commiecrat. It spares us the cost of shooting them during CW2, something you might ponder, the next time you're one toke over the line.
I think drugs should be legalized, simply as a eugenic marker, to add some bleach to the gene pool. Stoners, tweakers, heroin addicts, drunks, can kill themselves quickly and cheaply, without society having to pay exorbitant money trying to either "cure" them or keep them behind bars.
We might lose the occasional Coleridge, but considering that my third bike in 7 months vanished to the tweakers, last night, and that, here in Oregon, C-4 mantraps are still, regrettably, illegal, I can stand to drop some users off of a high place, to see if they bounce.
Sorry to hear that. Since the drug war hyperinflates drug prices, thus incentivizing theft, legalization would help you hang on to bikes too.
You clearly are insane.
And the occasional Satchmo.
So you are putting all people who use cannabis into a category of mentally defective and should die because you don’t know how to lock up your bike.
Really and you think they are defective.
You wanna do anything you want to. In what way does getting stoned, or buzzed or drunk benefit? You're useless for any practical purpose until your overworked liver flushes out your bloodstream.
Until then, someone can walk up and put a bullet in your eye, and you'll sit there with a goofy grin while he does it...
Back in the Old Corps, a lot of stoners and boozers got themselves and others killed in 'Da 'Nam. Used up all my sympathy for people who want to inflict their chemical dependencies on me.
And I'm insane? Yeah, sure, Unh Huh...
I was correct you are insane.
Your ignorance of cannabis use is staggering, all based on your inability to lock your bike.
(By the way, my stoner brother stroked out at the age of 44. He was toking 2 oz. a day, but I'm SURE that his non-habit had nothing to do with his death.)
Ok, so your brother had a stroke, I am sorry.
Ok, so your bike was stolen.
Your ignorance with regard to cannabis use is staggering.
Fark it. Why am I bothering with a stoner? He does’t have two brain cells left.
Two ounces a day?
That would have cost him a fortune.
I get your experiences, I understand your angst and it is understandable.
Your brother is not the norm.
Cannabis can be used effectively for pain relief.
Parmas are testing sprays that would relieve pain without head highs.
Cannabis by eating or smoking can relief symptoms of chemo therapy.
Seeds have more protein per ounce than beef. The seeds can be used as when processed as flour, or thickening agents for gravies and soups, with out head highs. The flour can be used for breads - no head highs.
Cannabis fibers can be woven in to cloth.
There are dozens of uses for cannabis, it is easily and cheaply grown.
I am really sorry that your experiences involve people who have apparently abused it, that is not the norm.
However, anything can and is abused.
I will say again, your ignorance of the variety of uses is staggering.
... No, it was again legal and use dropped considerably after a time. The Government got tax revenue from it and the whole thing passed into history. ...
Wrong on your first conclusion, and skewed on you next, IMHO.
Joe Kennedy made his fortune during 'Prohibition'. When Congress decided to end that embargo, he made his next fortune as a prime importer ... of booze (particularly Scotch, but lots more!).
BUT, during those 'speak-easy' days, the people realized the value of recreational pot. When booze became legal, old Joe financed a film and set up (funded) a "society" to fight that 'demon weed' Marihuana! It was really eating into his profits, and he had no control over the sources.
Today, the 'legal' system has too great an investment to make it 'legal'!
"Smoke 'em if you got 'em!" Would if I could, since my Dad has Alzheimer's and Pot has shown some benefits in treatment thereof!!! Plus, the buzz is better than anything you can drink, without the hangover, nor barfing on yourself!
BTW, the most devastating DRUG in the World is ALCOHOL!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.