Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer To Muslim Protestors In Egypt: “Go To Hell”
Tammy Bruce Live Wire ^ | September 11, 2012 | Tammy Bruce

Posted on 09/12/2012 6:17:07 AM PDT by el_texicano

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-105 next last
To: el_texicano

“Soon after news of Ambassador Stevens’ death broke, Afghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the “inhuman and abusive act” of the filmmakers, which he said, “has caused enmity and confrontation between the religions and cultures of the world,” according to the Wall Street Journal. “

From a Drudge article on this subject.

Nearly ten years, thousands of dead Americans and millions of American dollars and we get THIS????????

Both Bush II and Obama are idiots and their foreign policies vis-a-vis Islam were and are, in direct opposition to America’s best interests.


51 posted on 09/12/2012 7:16:38 AM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

That’s a distinction with no difference!


52 posted on 09/12/2012 7:18:55 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Obama for president -- of KENYA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
Pull our embassy out of Egypt and treat them as a terrorist nation!!!

And not another penny in "foreign aid".

53 posted on 09/12/2012 7:19:56 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

There’s a big difference. Embassies are not sovereign territory. It’s a common mistake to say they are.

If Romney said what you suggest he’d be laughed out of the room by anyone with knowledge of diplomatic protocol and rightly so.

But I agree with you. People storming embassies are attacking that nation and should be dealt with accordingly.


54 posted on 09/12/2012 7:20:55 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Yup Bush was definitely a fool, however Obama could be not what he appears to be. He certainly does all he can to advance the interests of Islam regardless of the cost to the USA.


55 posted on 09/12/2012 7:24:23 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Charles, they are going to send us there, and our muslim president is going to help them.


56 posted on 09/12/2012 7:24:59 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Bush II was a fool. Obama is a guy who is doing exactly what he set out to do, a la “2016” eviscerating the military power and foreign policy influence of a “colonial power”, i.e. America.

Obama is not a President. He is a public enemy sitting in the Oval Office, placed there by the incompetence of his predecessor, the stupidity of his political adversary in the 2008 election, the collaboration of the Marxist Media, and the naivety of the American voting public.

57 posted on 09/12/2012 7:28:18 AM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: livius

Obama’s crony capitalist supporters hoping to get the inside track now that the “Arab Spring” has created such an enticing investment climate? LOL!


58 posted on 09/12/2012 7:36:37 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind
I was so proud watching Charles last night. HE and those like him make me proud of my country.

Meanwhile, Juan Williams was spouting his usual muslim-butt-wiping whining that Americans should be more considerate of muslim sensitivity.


59 posted on 09/12/2012 7:37:37 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dervish
Krauthammer is correct 99% of the time. But he gets excoriated here for that 1%.

Correct me if I'm wrong but IIRC, Krauthammer is extremely antigun / anti Second Amendment. If he expounds on those topics, you bet I'm going to EXCORIATE him like HELL!

60 posted on 09/12/2012 7:40:01 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

One day they will Charles. One day they will.


61 posted on 09/12/2012 7:42:25 AM PDT by crosshairs (America: Once the land of the free. Still the home of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angcat
Unlike Charles Krauthammer who believes we should be arming the Syrian rebels, John Bolton says that’s a bad idea

I agree with Bolton.

Have we totally forgotten how the Afghani Mujahadeen turned on us after we gave them weapons and support to drive the Russians out of Aghanistan back in the 1980's?

How the Iraq's have turned on us, killing Americans with the weapons we gave them?

And now the Libyans and Egyptians are turning on us after Obama used our own military to support their militant muslim revolution.


62 posted on 09/12/2012 7:43:05 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

I agree with Charles K, however I always find it necessary to add this comment regarding CK....WHY THE HECK DID YOU WRITE ALL THOSE WONDERFUL ARTICLES ABOUT OBAMA IN 2008???

I knew he was a pos not fit for office, why didn`t CK know that?

Glad he is coming around nevertheless...he also owes Gov Palin an apology or three


63 posted on 09/12/2012 7:48:15 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

CK played a big part in Obama`s election in 2008. Obama campaign used to quote CK in making their points.

Cant tell you how many times I would tune into CNN/MSNBC to hear a liberal pundit say....Charles Krauthammer agrees with me etc etc

Talked about how BO was such a wonderful speaker, was pretty sickening.


64 posted on 09/12/2012 7:53:11 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: angcat

I’m glad Bolton believes arming the Syrian rebels is a bad idea. That sounds more like the rational guy I saw him as.

What doesn’t get published in the enemedia is that the “Arab Spring” rebels are killing Christians and other Muslims that are not from the same sect.

Frankly, there is no good side in Syria. While Assad did somewhat protect religious minorities, he was allied with the nutcases in Iran. IMO we should never intervene in any Muslim vs. Muslim violence in a foreign country.

We had absolutely no justification for helping the rebels overthrow Qadafi. Yes, he was a pig, but he was giving us information on al Qaeda and had ceased to work on nukes way back when W was running the show. Now we have feral animals that we (at least most of us here and certainly the preezy and Hillary) knew were in the mix of Libyan rebels.

There may have been a contingent who wanted more freedom, but we KNEW that some of the rebel leaders were al Qaeda because they TOLD us they were.

I totally agree with you: “But nonetheless it’s important that we not be arming people that might commit their own atrocities.” Barky and Hillary have been working to commit us militarily all over the ME and NOT to any good end.


65 posted on 09/12/2012 7:57:55 AM PDT by Sal (STAND YOUR GROUND laws are the prosecutor's target--GZ is collateral damage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DH

“That’s a lie. We have both the thought police and speech police very active in our “new age” society.

Don’t think so? Say (or think) the wrong words at work and you can lose your job. Say them anywhere and you may find yourself in court.

...

Free speech......I don’t think so.”

The Constitutional protection of speech pertains to political speech directed at the government. It does not protect us, for example, from the legal consequences of libelous speech directed at another private person nor does it protect us from violations of the policies of private employers. This is an important distinction that is sometimes forgotten in contemporary discussions of “political correctness”.


66 posted on 09/12/2012 8:02:39 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

With that they may go back to hell where they came from.


67 posted on 09/12/2012 8:04:21 AM PDT by Morgana (-----------> Eat at Chick-Fil-A <-----------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

THIS PRESIDENT AND HIS ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION ARE A BUNCH OF P.O.S. TRAITORS. IF NO ONE RESIGNS IN PROTEST OVER THE TYPE OF RESPONSE TO THIS BARBARITY DURING THESE PAST 24 HRS, THEN I CONDEMN THEM ALL TO HELL!!!!


68 posted on 09/12/2012 8:12:00 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

That is bogus.

So acknowledging that Obama is a good speaker caused him to be elected? Ridiculous.

CK attacked Zero constantly.


69 posted on 09/12/2012 8:16:05 AM PDT by dervish (ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier; Friendofgeorge

I believe CK’s position is that if crime were drastically reduced in US then guns should be too.

I also agree with you that he should rightfully be criticized for anti-gun positions.

However the condemnation he received on FR was of the type in post #64.

Thank you for your service


70 posted on 09/12/2012 8:20:55 AM PDT by dervish (ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

It appears this “movie-trailer” (or whatever it is) was put up on YT several months ago. So, it seems these terrorist acts were planned well in advance - yes, to take place ON 9/11.


71 posted on 09/12/2012 8:24:16 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Islam sucks.

Mohammed was a pedophile.

Just look at the horrifying conditions in which Islam’s billions of adherents live. Your religion begets your society, and muslim societies suck everywhere, 100% of the time.

The Koran states that Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6 years old, and consummated the relationship when she was 9 YEARS OLD. That’s pedophilia in any society in any era.

Islam sucks. Mohammed was a pedophile.

In the United States, we have a perfect First Amendment right to say what we think. I don’t much care whether Muslims are offended by what I think or say.

We also have a perfect Second Amendment right to help ensure the validity of our First Amendment rights.

:-)


72 posted on 09/12/2012 8:26:02 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (You didn't build that. The private sector is doing fine. We tried our plan and it worked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Here is the 12-minute video trailer that is driving the muslim world and our own libtards (more) insane.

I can't imagine why? /s

I haven't seen so many gags meant to drive these nutballs crazy stitched together so densely and with such manifest contempt, ever. It's as if somebody went through the Koran carefully and satirized the whole thing. They didn't even work hard at it, as if to say that making an effort is not a worthy use of time. It's perfect.

As Moe Howard would say, "This means war!"

73 posted on 09/12/2012 8:32:10 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: babyfreep

Remember those shots of these pigs desecrating the graves of allied soldiers from WW2?

Islam is a CONTINUING conspiracy that started back in the 700s and 800s to take over the entire world.

This is just the latest episode.


74 posted on 09/12/2012 8:41:54 AM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

One quote...

“When the political winds shift, I will stand with the Muslims.”

Where will he stand - in front of two burning embassies and a dead ambassador, perhaps?

Nice Arab Spring you gave us, Obi...


75 posted on 09/12/2012 8:48:55 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“...they have mental issues..”

Probably stating the obvious..but has anyone noticed the mooslims are acting crazy and murdering people (yet again) because a film portrays them as acting crazy and murdering people...?

Kind of well, crazy.


76 posted on 09/12/2012 8:49:59 AM PDT by Leep (I'm a Chic-Fil-- A-merican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: angcat

YES, YES, YES


77 posted on 09/12/2012 8:58:45 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: babyfreep

“So, it seems these terrorist acts were planned well in advance - yes, to take place ON 9/11.”

Bears repeating until it finally sinks in.

It was actually put up 2 months ago.... regardless.... these attacks were obviously planned in advance to coincide with our 9/11 anniversary as anyone with half of a fully functioning brain should realize.

The kneejerk reactions of the dear leaders are not surprising in the least.

Bunch of scumbags.... the lot of them.


78 posted on 09/12/2012 8:59:50 AM PDT by A Voice (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Obama is a Muslim sympathizer.

So is Hillary, because she is sleeping with the enemy (Huma).
79 posted on 09/12/2012 9:12:55 AM PDT by crosshairs (America: Once the land of the free. Still the home of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: A Voice

These acts were orchestrated by Iran as a preemptive “Look what I can do if we get attacked!” moment. You don’t have to look too hardbto see that.

Just my two cents.


80 posted on 09/12/2012 9:16:39 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Meanwhile, Juan Williams was spouting his usual muslim-butt-wiping whining that Americans should be more considerate of muslim sensitivity.

Because that is what hussein believes and whatever hussein believes, Juan defends. The old melanin thing again.
81 posted on 09/12/2012 9:17:54 AM PDT by crosshairs (America: Once the land of the free. Still the home of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
When the executive branch thusly polices our speech, our freedom of speech has been infringed and remains under threat and intimidation! It's a high crime to violate the oath of the presidential office this way, not simply a disgrace!

HF

82 posted on 09/12/2012 9:31:15 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
Say (or think) the wrong words at work and you can lose your job. Say them anywhere and you may find yourself in court.

There is a fundamental difference between your employer taking action and the government taking action. It's a difference we cannot ever allow ourselves to gloss over.

83 posted on 09/12/2012 9:33:17 AM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

“In the United States, we have a perfect First Amendment right to say what we think.”

We haven’t had that right in about 25 years.


84 posted on 09/12/2012 9:38:31 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

We don’t need to explain anything. We need to send an ultimatum: “We’re going to kill the entire population of Benghazi and anybody else we feel like needs killing, and you’re going to be okay with this, or we’ll start the process of exterminating the entire population of Libya.”


85 posted on 09/12/2012 9:43:44 AM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

It’s even worse than that. On 9/11 our state department issued an apology in response TO OUR EGYPTIAN EMBASSY BEING ATTACKED!


86 posted on 09/12/2012 9:50:36 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Obama doesn't believe in the first amendment.

He wants a constitutional amendment to restrict the freedom of speech (because the progressives lost their attempt to limit certain kinds of political spending just before an election). He wants to limit freedom of religion to "freedom of worship." He would probably embrace a law prohibiting speech offensive to Muslims--which of course might need a constitutional amendment to be enforceable.

87 posted on 09/12/2012 9:52:15 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

“Obama is not a President. He is a public enemy sitting in the Oval Office, placed there by the incompetence of his predecessor, the stupidity of his political adversary in the 2008 election, the collaboration of the Marxist Media, and the naivety of the American voting public.”

Yes and Amen. We have a POTUS/administration antagonistic to our First Amendment rights - to all our rights.


88 posted on 09/12/2012 10:56:54 AM PDT by el_texicano (Palinista to the core! Ryan will kick butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

...libelous speech directed at another private person nor does it protect us from violations of the policies of private employers. This is an important distinction that is sometimes forgotten in contemporary discussions of “political correctness”.


You are correct to some points but not all. Employers will fire an employee for libelous accusations against the business itself but can be sued for firing an employee who does so against a private individual not working for the company. For what reason? Because the company can be fined or sued for what they actually do or say. Some more free speech and thought from the company huh.....no.

To libel someone you must TELL A LIE about them that causes either financial or societal harm to them. Telling the truth is NEVER libel....period!

The thought and speech police also hold entities responsible for anything that is not politically correct...the same as the do individuals. That in turn, makes the employer a subordinate enforcer for the thought and speech police. To comply, they must punish (or fire) the offending employee quickly to demonstrate to the others within ear or eyesight that is what happens to those in our company that don’t toe the political correctness line.

The disease permeates throughout our society and with each year it gets worse.

It’s grown to the point that Orwell would be stupefied to see his 1984 come to life in the late 60’s and to mature to the point that it is today.

In a couple of months, his book will finally reach full application for our society or will simply slow it’s march to fruition with the Republicans.


89 posted on 09/12/2012 11:54:37 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DH

General Dempsey...THOUGHT POLICE GENERAL


90 posted on 09/12/2012 1:10:33 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

LET’S SEE...16 POSTS BEFORE THE ANTI KRAUTHAMMER-BOTS ARRIVED...jeez , so brilliant. what would we do without your fantastic comments.


91 posted on 09/12/2012 1:13:22 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Perfect!


92 posted on 09/12/2012 1:14:59 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Oh heavens, no!

Secure THAT embassy? Get the people out and bomb the place!


93 posted on 09/12/2012 1:15:57 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Oh, you must be referring to that group of oh-so-perfect conservatives that can only refrain from criticizing Dead Presidents and Palin.


94 posted on 09/12/2012 1:18:07 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: angcat

I’ve been saying that for a long time and will add K.T. McFarlane should be our Ambassador to the UN, until we demolish that piece of CRAP.
I know women can’t have Brass Balls but something tells me she has something made of Brass!


95 posted on 09/12/2012 1:25:39 PM PDT by GOYAKLA (Recall/ Impeachment Day, November 6, 2012. FUBO, same for RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: keats5; angcat; Rummyfan; Sal

“The Muslim Brotherhood benefits from this because they assaulted our embassy and WE GAVE UP.” (emphasis mine)

John Bolton
On FOX’s ‘Gutfeld’
Sept. 11 - Calif. time

Posted this on another thread . . .


96 posted on 09/12/2012 1:27:08 PM PDT by USARightSide ( SUPPORTING O U R TROOPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: All

for those of us who are cubicle bound,

how is the MSM covering / not covering this?

we need to talk this Obama incompetence up person to person to person.

I already had one collegue who does not get it because they just want free stuff.


97 posted on 09/12/2012 1:46:45 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

And he was loathesome towards Sarah in 2008...


98 posted on 09/12/2012 2:21:32 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dervish

You must have missed much of the 2008 election then. Krauthammer was mentioned favorably by many liberal pundits on a regular basis, he melted after hearing Obama speak, time after time. He on occasion was hard on Obama.

He repeatedly wrote about what a bad choice Gov Palin was for the VP spot, said that McCain made a terrible choice,The Liberals loved it.

Yes CK had a hand in getting Obama elected...ABSOLUTELY


99 posted on 09/12/2012 7:34:30 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

I for one said I was glad that CK was on the right side for the moment, however CK has rich liberal history and has to be taken with caution.

He helped get Obama elected in 2008 and that ios a undeniable fact!

Yes he backhandedly endorsed McCain/Palin after completely disrespecting Gov Palin repeatedly.

I would not be surprised if he voted for Obama, the man can not be trusted.


100 posted on 09/12/2012 7:39:48 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson