Skip to comments.Study: One year later, no overall negative impact on military after repeal of DADT
Posted on 09/12/2012 9:51:08 AM PDT by scottjewell
...[T]he first academic study of the effects of repealing dont ask dont tell has found the repeal has had no overall negative impact on military readiness or its component dimensions, including cohesion, recruitment, retention, assaults, harassment or morale.
[Member of Airforce reads gay Military magazine]
The study was published Monday by the Palm Center, a research branch of the Williams Institute at University of California Los Angeles Law School, which describes itself as dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy.
(Excerpt) Read more at security.blogs.cnn.com ...
2. There is still a pervasive impact on the general national culture which may have its own ripple effects for years to come.
This government/media complex propagandizes the American people no less than did the soviets or the chicoms in their heyday.
I pinged out an article recently saying that sexual attacks on men are UP.
Thanks, faggot in chief!!!
This tudy is worthless.
Right: First of all, it is really too soon to tell how matters really now stand. Second, it is a truism that researchers create and conduct studies in such a manner as to get the results they are looking for.
In the ‘80s, there were many studies - now debunked - which showed divorce had no negative impact on kids. This will wind up the same, I am certain.
“Lies, damned lies and statistics” Mark Twain
Exactly. Researchers get the results they were looking for.
I heard that homosexual rapes in the military are skyrocketing.
I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
It is never a good idea for the military to allow bone smoking butt pirates to prance around in the open. Do you want a CO that is rump ranger? Part of leadership is respect.
Son of a gun, the media found a study that re-inforced the media’s desires.
“Given that being perceived as antigay will disqualify you from further promotion, how do you feel about serving with gays in the military?”
ready .. FOFL .. EXecute ! !
If they are, it will never be reported by the MSM.
My thought exactly, when reading the headline.
Excellent and appropos quote.
Heard that too. Future counter-studies may tell a different tale.
Of course: Their conclusion was implicit in the premises of their study and in the formation of their questions.
Exactly, rigged from the get-go.
A study from a “research institute” specifically dedicated to gay issues.
Push-studies such as this use the same principles as push-polling. They both are designed to accomplish an end, regardless of the means.
The other night my wife was watching some show called “Military Wives” or something like that. Anyway, there was a scene in which the troops were deploying to Afghanistan. All teh husbands and wives were kissing their spouses. Fine. Then there was a scene where a female Lt Col laid a long, passionate lip-lock on her “partner.” Yep - Hollywood and the liberal news media are pushing the narrative trying to normalize this crap.
BS alert.... has it even BEEN a year yet?
Oops.. forgot to ping you two..
Is that really fair or conservative, to use the Rangers in that manner, “rump ranger”?
“The Williams Institute was founded in 2001 through a generous grant by businessman, academic, and philanthropist Charles R. Chuck Williams. Mr. Williams inaugural donation of $2.5 million to create the Williams Institute was the largest donation ever given to any academic institution in support of a gay and lesbian academic program in any discipline. Over the past decade, he has given over $13 million to fund the Institute.”
I wonder why CNN did not publish a disclosure that the faux “study” is by a LGBT support institute.
CNN? I don’t have the time to read this today, but I seriously doubt the findings of this ‘study’.
Yes, very illuminating. The LGBTs went crazy over the fact that the Regnerus study may have had some connection to National Organization for Marriage, but when the shoe is on the other foot, its all cool.
Exactly. How are you gonna respect a commander going into battle when it's common knowledge that commander roots around on the genitals of other men with his mouth. It's all a sham. They want no one to recognize a difference between heterosexual and homosexual. As if homosexuality is simply a matter of lifestyle choice, and not a matter of shame and revulsion.
I wonder why CNN did not publish a disclosure that the faux study is by a LGBT support institute."
Excellent work on the info.
I wonder who ended up paying for this goofy and meaningless study. What a waste.
When "our" troops are told to turn their guns against the citizens of the US, they will be only too happy to do so.
(s) obviously this study is true since the military as social engineering protected the ambassador so well.(/s)
I wonder how much “napolitano-ing” has happened in the diplomatic corps?
Excellent point - and a frightening one as well.
Romney wanted to end DADT.
“One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clintons dont ask, dont tell, dont pursue military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nations military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share.”
W. Mitt Romney
I don’t speak with those symbols, what is that in English?
Was showing disappointment in Romney.
They have gone up but that was still under DADT. We will have to wait for the new reports early next year.
Seems like the rump rangers rely on ambush tactics and numbers to get their victims. They get them in the showers.
The attackers are rarely caught.
This “study” is as credible as the “study” that was concocted to pass sodomy in the military to begin with. Bunk!
You know it, I know it, they know it.
I agree with you.
Maybe with more of them in there, they’ll be happy to spend their time together.