Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

You do realize of course that you are not in agreement with the pro-life organizations’ views on this:

https://www.abolishabortion.com/feed/romney-opposes-pro-abortion-health-mother-exception

Although Romney had made his position on abortion clear throughout the campaign — opposing abortions except in cases of rape or incest and contrasting that with President Barack Obama’s position supporting 100% of all abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason — some pro-life voters wrongly assumed Romney had changed his position.

However, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, tells conservative radio talk show host Bryan Fischer that she confirmed with the Romney campaign that the candidate did not meant to say “health” and that his pro-life views remain the same.

“If that were his position, he would never have received our endorsement, that’s for sure,” Dannenfelser told the American Family Radio host. “I have heard clarification from his spokesperson, restating what his position really is, which is rape, incest, life of the mother. That is his position. Those are his exceptions.”


“Governor Romney has made it clear that he is the pro-life candidate in this race — which is why the SBA List Board of Directors voted unanimously to stand behind him in April. It is the responsibility of all pro-life voters to now unite behind Governor Romney. Together we can put a pro-life leader in the White House,” Dannenfelser said.


46 posted on 09/14/2012 11:27:16 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole America’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG; xzins
You do realize of course that you are not in agreement with the pro-life organizations’ views on this:
. . . . .
However, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, tells conservative radio talk show host Bryan Fischer that she confirmed with the Romney campaign that the candidate did not meant to say “health” and that his pro-life views remain the same.


If he really didn't mean to say that, then why no correction from Romney himself?

Furthermore, why would you believe the words of a man who claimed at CPAC "I was a severly conservative Governor of MA" or "I have always been Pro-Life"?

No-one, supporting the murder of babies for the "Health and Life" of the mother, or even for incest or Rape is Pro-Life, and whether or not your Pro-Life organizations have the moral correctness to be honest about this or not is immaterial.

You don't support the butchering of the unborn and claim you are Pro-Life.

It's called being dishonest; It's called lying.
49 posted on 09/15/2012 12:21:30 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson