Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Harry Safe in Terror Attack
Arutz Sheva ^ | 15/9/12 | Uzi Baruch

Posted on 09/15/2012 2:12:05 PM PDT by Eleutheria5

Taliban armed with suicide vests, guns and rockets stormed a heavily fortified airfield in Afghanistan where Prince Harry is deployed, killing two U.S. Marines and attacking aircraft in a major security breach.

The militia, which is leading a 10-year insurgency against 117,000 NATO troops, said it carried out the assault to avenge a U.S.-made film deemed insulting to Islam that has sparked deadly riots across the Middle East and North Africa.

The attack on Camp Bastion in southern Helmand province, one of the toughest battlegrounds of the war, started at 10:15 pm (1745 GMT) on Friday, said U.S. Army Major Adam Wojack.

The base was cleared of enemy fighters on Saturday morning, he added.

Prince Harry was never in danger, officials confirmed. Although the Taliban have vowed to kill the third in line to the British throne, one of its spokesmen told AFP that the assault "had nothing to do with the prince".

General Sayed Malook, head of the Afghan army in the south, said a suicide bomber blew himself up, blasting a hole in the perimeter wall and allowing insurgents to storm inside with guns and rocket-propelled grenades.

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; attack; campbastion; princeharry
Only now that his future subjects have been informed that the prince is well, so has the Taliban been informed that he's at Camp Bastion, which can expect more fun and games. Who releases this sort of information?
1 posted on 09/15/2012 2:12:12 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Nothing against Prince Harry, but I resent the tone of this article that implies that all is well because he is safe. I’m sure the families of the two slain Marines are not comforted by his safety.


2 posted on 09/15/2012 2:32:08 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

We ain’t killin’ enough of these animals.

Islam has been at war with civilization for 1500 years. We are currently locked in the latest escalation of that war. And, we are under the leadership of, arguably, a kindred spirit of theirs...

Time to take off the gloves and resolve this.


3 posted on 09/15/2012 2:41:36 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

He’s not safe, just presently alive and well. Now they know where he is. Neither are any other troops stationed at Bastion, because now they’ll come gunning for the prince.


4 posted on 09/15/2012 2:43:12 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

British royals have fought at the front line for two millenia - it’s part of their duty to our country and it’s not the first time the enemy has been islam and I doubt it will be the last. Harry calls himself the ‘Bullet Magnet’ so he’s under no misapprehensions about his role and I’m sure he can’t wait to get even next time he’s on a mission in his WAH-64.

PS - you’re a bit behind the times with the term ‘subjects’. Their haven’t been any since 1st January 1983 when the 1981 British Nationality act came into force - we’re all citizens now.


5 posted on 09/15/2012 2:58:31 PM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead

I don’t take issue with a royal serving in a combat zone, just with the media publicizing it. While the royal might have no problem with the danger, publicizing his presence trebles it not just for the prince but for the men who serve with him, and the media should have realized that and sat on the story. They’ll be going all out to bag a royal now.

OK. You’re not subjects anymore. Good for you. My mistake.


6 posted on 09/15/2012 3:07:24 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead
Harry calls himself the ‘Bullet Magnet’

He wouldn't be if he served without the fanfare of announcement of his presence in Afghanistan.

How dumb are the British to not only announce his presence in Afghanistan but also provide his location (Camp Bastion)? This not only increases his risk but also increases the risk to others around him.

I ask again, how dumb are the British?

7 posted on 09/15/2012 3:15:30 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
I don’t take issue with a royal serving in a combat zone, just with the media publicizing it.>

Why are you blaming the media? What "Office" of the British government provided this information to the press?

Now we have two dead US Marines and others who may have been injured by this stupidity.

8 posted on 09/15/2012 3:20:52 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

You can thank the British Ministry of Defense. They released the information as to when and where Prince Harry would be deployed before he ever went. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/sep/07/prince-harry-afghanistan-apache-helicopter?newsfeed=true


9 posted on 09/15/2012 3:21:04 PM PDT by Spirit of Liberty (If you build it, Obama wants credit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirit of Liberty
You can thank the British Ministry of Defense.

If they ever make another sequel to "Dumb and Dumber", the British Ministry of Defense would be a good place to start casting.

10 posted on 09/15/2012 3:29:28 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

The British government released this? It keeps getting worse.


11 posted on 09/15/2012 3:30:38 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Oh, thank God it was only marines sacrificed at the altar of Jihad and not the special, wonderful Prince Harry bare butt of Las Vegas. Dempsey might have had to change the policy of planting jihadists on the bases had something happened to the Prince.

Dang. Where is the memory, brain and spirit of Reagan and Thachter? Don’t look in McBackstabber’s senate office; it’s not there. These liberal a$$hats are going to get us nuked. For real.


12 posted on 09/15/2012 3:32:37 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

Easily as dumb as the yanks and the Israelis. This is just the latest instance of British obtuseness, but it seems to be an Olympic sport, and they’re all in training.


13 posted on 09/15/2012 3:32:58 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

“Prince Harry Safe in Terror Attack”: Vegas prostitutes heave sigh of relief.


14 posted on 09/15/2012 3:35:25 PM PDT by Ironfocus (O Must Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

So is Harry being punished for the naked photographs?

I hope they don’t punish Kate and send her there too.


15 posted on 09/15/2012 3:37:59 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Easily as dumb as the yanks and the Israelis.

Care to explain what that comment means?

16 posted on 09/15/2012 3:40:37 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

Self-explanatory, but since you asked, the British government is no more nor less retarded than the American or the Israeli. Maybe they’re all having a contest to see who can do the most self-destructive, idiotic things on the official stationery of their respective countries. It seems so.


17 posted on 09/15/2012 3:43:35 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Easily as dumb as the yanks and the Israelis.

Self-explanatory, but since you asked, the British government is no more nor less retarded than the American or the Israeli. Maybe they’re all having a contest to see who can do the most self-destructive, idiotic things on the official stationery of their respective countries. It seems so.

Self-explanatory? I don't think so. Care to provide some specifics?

18 posted on 09/15/2012 3:47:40 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I’d be very surprised if he was ever actually at Camp Bastion any longer than a photo-op and refueling - if that.

If he was/is, then the Brits really are morons.


19 posted on 09/15/2012 3:47:58 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
The militia, which is leading a 10-year insurgency against 117,000 NATO troops, said it carried out the assault to avenge a U.S.-made film deemed insulting to Islam that has sparked deadly riots across the Middle East and North Africa.

Right. Thats today. Yesterday it was something else. Tomorrow, it will be something else again.

These are afghans we're dealing with, and muslim afghans at that. When you are muslim, outrage is a full time job.

...the Taliban have vowed to kill the third in line to the British throne...

They should spread the rumor that Harry was in the movie. That will give them a chance to clear out a few more of the buggers.

20 posted on 09/15/2012 3:55:56 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

The present story is an example of British stupidity.

State Apologizing for an errant you-tube video knocking Muhamed is an example of American stupidity.

As for Israeli stupidity, I see it outside my window every day. The destruction of hilltop outposts such as Mitzpe Avihai on Hill 18 right outside said window all in the name of a piece process that if consumated along the lines of the Oslo Accord will inevitably lead to war.

Those are all the examples I care to give at this time. It’s late and I have a big day planned. But those readily available through your local wire service are legion.


21 posted on 09/15/2012 4:01:37 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Terror attack? On a military base?


22 posted on 09/15/2012 4:03:14 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

So they wanted to kill Prince Harry but took out two Harriers instead. Maybe there was a translation error.


23 posted on 09/15/2012 4:05:21 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The prince does indeed go out into harms way with the rest of the troops. I’ve seen a story going back a few years interviewing his commander, but that was long after he was already at a different, undisclosed command. That’s the story in which he got the name “bullet magnet,” and that’s how one covers a story like that. Here they are revealing his present location, which is beyond stupid.


24 posted on 09/15/2012 4:05:38 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead

Well thank heaven a “royal” is safe. Perhaps if the British government hadn’t been so unforgivably stupid as to announce his duty station the families of two American Marines might not be grieving right now.

Now your “royal” family will be able to carry on consorting with Las Vegas whores and displaying their tits in public. You must be so proud....


25 posted on 09/15/2012 4:07:05 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: generally

Why wasn’t Prince Harry aloft in his helicopter attacking the Taliban?


26 posted on 09/15/2012 4:27:24 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Those are all the examples I care to give at this time. It’s late and I have a big day planned. But those readily available through your local wire service are legion.

You introduce criticism of the US and Israelis in a thread that had nothing to do with either country except the loss of two US Marines due to British stupidity and then, when I question you about this you are a little short with your examples and the cite the fact that you have a busy day. Criticize the Israelis all you like since you are a citizen of that country, but I take exception with the criticism of the US.

Matter of fact, you can take your criticisms of the US and stuff them, since you obviously are clueless.

27 posted on 09/15/2012 4:31:09 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

time to play more whack-a-mole

and I include the ‘journalist’ reporting the location information


28 posted on 09/15/2012 4:50:32 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

“I ask again, how dumb are the British?”

Not quite as dumb as the Americans having no troops to protect their ambassador to Libya. If you believe the taliban that the reason they attacked the main compound in Afghanistan was because Harry was there, you’ve been watching too much al jazeera.


29 posted on 09/15/2012 5:46:42 PM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“Well thank heaven a “royal” is safe. Perhaps if the British government hadn’t been so unforgivably stupid as to announce his duty station the families of two American Marines might not be grieving right now.

Now your “royal” family will be able to carry on consorting with Las Vegas whores and displaying their tits in public. You must be so proud....”

I can see you’re easily led by taliban propoaganda - if you think they attacked CB because Harry’s there you’re foolish.

Yes, I am proud of Harry. He’s a multi-millionaire who women swoon over and can live the life of a playboy but chooses to become an Apache pilot and insists on being posted to the most dangerous theatres. You should be ashamed criticising a soldier out fighting the enemy to protect our freedom while you sit in front of your computer.

As for your other comment, if you consider a woman being photographed on a private estate by a man hiding in the woods with a long lens ‘as displaying their tits in public’, you’re a warped individual indeed.


30 posted on 09/15/2012 5:54:30 PM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead

I didn’t criticize Harry. I criticized your governent for their stupid actions that led to two Americans being killed. If you think the Taleban didn’t lick their lips at the thought off possibly grabbing his royal ass you’re a fool.

The MOD should have kept their bloody mouths shut. There was no good reason on Earth to announce that information. None.


31 posted on 09/15/2012 6:03:47 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: generally

Exactly! Being a high-profile target, he should never have been sent there in the first place. Why should US Marines sacrifice their lives to protect British royalty? This is disgusting.


32 posted on 09/15/2012 8:03:34 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead

Coming back to this thread and reading your obfuscations lead me to a simple conclusion:

You are aptly named.


33 posted on 09/15/2012 8:32:56 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

You do realise British troops are there, yes?.


34 posted on 09/15/2012 9:24:46 PM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
My problem with this article is calling this a terror attack. This was not terrorism, this was war. They acted as a military unit and attacked a military base. While I mourn for the family of the Marines killed in this attack,we are at war and this was a legitimate military target. Killing civilians and attacking embassies is terrorism.
35 posted on 09/15/2012 10:16:05 PM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

Legitimate military target, yes. But a suicide bomber is a terroristic weapon. It relies on a breach of trust. As such, this is right on the borderline between terrorism and a military strike.


36 posted on 09/15/2012 10:39:46 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5; Caulkhead; Lurker

Yes, I saw the story prior to the attack, soon after the Vegas photos hit the papers. My first thought was the Brits were trying to get Harry some good PR.

The article I saw (and can’t find now, of course) said the reason the MOD was releasing the story was because 1) the last time Harry was sent over in secret, the news got out and they scrambled to get him back to Britain and 2) they figured with Twitter, Facebook, etc etc, there was no way they would be able to keep it a secret.


37 posted on 09/16/2012 3:13:51 PM PDT by Spirit of Liberty (If you build it, Obama wants credit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I did not see anything that this was a suicide bomber, it sounded like an attack.


38 posted on 10/01/2012 9:06:39 PM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson