Skip to comments.Netanyahu On US Embassy Attacks: 'You Want These Fanatics To Have Nuclear Weapons?'
Posted on 09/16/2012 5:00:58 AM PDT by lowbridge
click here to read article
Lol. It’s just possible fish is originally of the Russian school of war, and they have a more direct approach than diplomatic pussyfooting. Also a more realistic view of thermonuclear war.
Dropped on your head as a child?
Ah, so that’s how things look from your vantage point living in your mommy and daddy’s basement, huh?
Good thing for you they aren’t charging you rent.
Oh, nonsense! Israel is the strongest country in the Middle East and has several nukes. It can defend itself. Islam rules the Middle East now, but they can’t even stop fighting each other, so I don’t see one country, tribe, or sect ruling the entire region. We need to increase our own energy supplies and let the ME oil producing countries wither on the vine.
That's not a realistic view.
You do know that's what would happen if ME oil was cut off from the rest of the world don't you?
LOL! My thoughts too when I read what "cunning" fish had to say. However - even though not very sharp, he is in fact a tool...
Well, yes, so why would we want an attack on Iran that would provoke them into trying to close the Straits of Hormuz? Won’t an attack on Iran send the price of oil through the roof?
Why is everyone so keen on an action that will only cause disaster? Unless Iran is utterly obliterated, it will resume its quest to get a nuke. If people are so keen on starting another war, at least make this one effective, which won’t happen. I still say this is insane.
No it isn’t. But the fact is, Iran would have nukes already if not for Russia.
Much monkey biz in the iranian nuke program and our response to it, and there’ll be much more. I’d like to exterminate Iran to the last thing moving, but I’m bloodyminded.
I can see Iran with a nuke as a threat to Israel.
The problem is there are another worse threats.
If you have that much threats you has to do some threat management and I can’t see it behind obvious populism.
Many thanks for your support! My message is people has to wake up and see what happens in ME more carefully.
I see the issue from a different perspective.
Why doesnt someone just say Obama plays for the other side?
Or better yet, he already knows exactly what is in the tube?
This arab spring thing is just one of Obamas orchestrated, choreographed and conducted projects in building and consolidating his North African caliphate. Being muslim, he knows exactly what he is doing, and at Americas expense. As a result , we have a Ghazi operating in our White House.
Too many people are blind to this.
Strategically, his goal was to encapsulate Israel. Soon they will take a run at it and if they find it easy going, then they will take another run at America.
Worst part? Obama has a penchant for dictators and rulers and the alien/muslim feels the same should be for America. It will be a bitch prying his ass from the White House. I believe he will attempt to hang on to power at any cost.
Obamas strategy is not pro American, rather the exact opposite/
I say Obama plays for the other side. And the most ridiculous Netanyahu joined him for populist reasons.
I can understand Obama as an anti-American muslum Kenyan, but how could Bibi do it?
obama: By all means, yes.
Well, the game is more complex than it looks. Bibi is playing ball with Putin and has been for a while, Putin plays Iran and gets good money and control which can be used for sabotage, in full understanding with Israel.
Example: when Iran got top notch air defense missiles from Russia, Putin gave the neuter codes to Bibi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.