Posted on 09/16/2012 4:45:22 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
On 9/11/12, America became victim to yet another terrorist attack. We've learned now that the Obama regime provided little if any security for our Embassy in Libya. Essentially, Christopher Stevens and associates were sitting ducks for an attack coinciding with a date most infamous for terror attacks on Americans. From a security perspective, how could any American serving overseas in the Middle East been left so incredibly vulnerable on this day?
Unbelievable that we'd even think possible, but the question here is "Did our gov't allow or even enable these attacks, either proactively or through willful negligence?" If so, for what purpose?
If we are to recognize that Obama would want nothing more than to shift the focus of the upcoming debates away from his miserable record on the economy than we might want to consider this as the motive for his enabling these attacks. Also consider the possibility that the Obama regime was looking for a way to provide cover for rising gas prices as a result of his assault on our oil industry. What better way to 'explain away' those rising fuel prices than to have uprisings in the Middle East just in time for the 2012 presidential election? Step back and look at the forest here, not the trees!.. Isn't this all a bit too coincidental, and does anyone really buy the Obama-controlled media's false narrative that these attacks are because of a movie which was posted on YouTube two months ago? Are we THAT gullible?
Our government's immediate response was to blame an American filmmaker and apologize for the movie's insulting of Islam. While we Americans waited, and waited, AND WAITED for President Obama to condemn the perpetrators, all we got was silence. When Romney decided to fill the void and make a comment denouncing the Obama regime's handling of this situation, he quickly became a target of the news media. At every turn in this critical situation, both the Obama regime and the news media's statements and actions have been completely irrational. Something's wrong here, folks. An immediate condemnation of Islamic extremism and terrorism has been sorely lacking throughout the course of these events. This diversion on behalf of all Obama regime members, including Susan Rice who insists the Libya attack was spontaneous and not planned is an obvious attempt to shift blame from Obama's failed foreign policy squarely onto the shoulders of Americans exercising their right to free speech; A filmmaker and Mitt Romney.
What we have here is the shifting of blame AWAY from terrorists and onto Americans. Blaming a rogue band of thugs with heavy weapons instead of an premeditated, organized group such as Al Qaeda reflects an administration that avoids placing blame where blame is due; Islamic terrorists.
And to those who immediately shun the notion that Obama is a Muslim, or worse, that Obama is a Muslim who is using his position of power to foment, aid and abet the spread of the Islamic Caliphate against the 'West' (United States and Israel), you may want to seriously reconsider. The missed opportunities or statements or actions or lack thereof on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama throughout this crisis aren't those taken by a President on the side of Israel or America, that is quite clear. Hillary celebrating Ramadan with the Libyan Ambassador at our State Department two days after the attack on our Consulate or Obama's meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood while rejecting Netanyahu of Israel's request for a meeting is clear indication of not only Obama's Muslim allegiance and life's mission but is also a sign that he is an 'enemy of the State' as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America.
Not quite yet. Obama wins in November it will be time to tighten our belts. Our cartridge belts.
....when martial law is declared and there’s no opposition party.
I know. Every day I expect it to happen here, but maybe muslims aren’t as dumb as I thought.
What did Obama know and when did he know it?
(rephrasing a question thrown at GWB after 9-11-2001)
“Did our gov’t allow or even enable these attacks, either proactively or through willful negligence?”
I felt at the time, Zero’s deafening silence on the matter for approximately 24 hours was a virtual wink and nod to the raghead perps who were behind the uprising.
Is there ANY monitoring of so-called “back channels” between Zero and the muslim brotherhood, for instance? Or does he have total secrecy as to who, when and for what reason he communicates with foreign entities? I would not be the least surprised if it were somehow revealed that he was actually involved in the planning of the attacks.......giving assurances that the Marines would be unarmed and that resistance to the attack would be minimal or non-existant. I have THAT LOW an opinion of the _resident!
When your starting point is the knowledge that he despises the Country and its Founding, and that he is a muslim himself and has gone over there and bowed down to the muslim leaders and apologized to them for who-knows-what.....it’s all downhill from there!
The problem with most Americans is that they don’t have a low enough opinion of BHO. There are too many suckers out there who still do not understand that there isn’t a loyal, patriotic bone in his body in regard to the U.S. of A.
Conspiratorial View of History, Inc.
“He wanted that human contact, he wanted to be able to speak to Palestinians on the street, and he couldn’t because security regulations made him always travel in armored vehicles,” she said. “He used to talk about how he felt this was an obstacle to his ability to really be who he wanted to be.”
At the same time, she said, “those security measures might have saved his life in a very different context.” Now there creeps in a thought, she said, that perhaps he was too trusting.
There have been some posts claiming that he was gay, and that he was raped by the crowd because they knew it. If he had a desire to participate in a gay lifestyle with locals, it would explain both why he would shun security that would limit his opportunities, and why they would know he was gay. The Obama administration will have plenty of blame for this, and the reason for the attack itself was not Steven's sexuality, but Stevens may have taken extra risks upon himself, and finally paid the price.
Possibly, but the real story is Obama is an incompetent “leader” and Hillary both care more about muslim feelings than they do about the lives of dedicated Americans.
I heard tonight that more than 50 of our soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan this year by Afghans who they were supposedly training. And the 5 Harrier jets had to be worth a lot of money. Obama doesn’t want to win in Afghanistan and I doubt he will never bring our guys home, in spite of his “timetable for withdrawal”. Hopefully Romney will bring them home. We can’t win a war when we turn over our weapons to the enemy.
Unfortunately - the majority of Americans are not paying attention to obama’s failures in foreign policy... The diversion of attention from obama’s domestic failures is much more significant...
Perhaps, the mssion of obamaInc is to “moderate” the internet for the good of the world. Hence, obamaInc’s stubborn insistence that a Youtube film is the reason for the madness. We will all get along with proper filters./s on the second senrence.
Not buying it - aside from your fantasy of him imposing martial law, this will hurt his chances, and he well knows that, which is why he and his adminstration is desperately hoping this can be spun as some whacko and isolated reaction to a movie. But obviously, from what we see being reported know, that’s not going to work.
BAMBI has no more authority to cancel elections that Mitt does. Maybe the mayor of Waco declares a state of emergency ... “Remember the Alamo, Remember Waco” and leads a calvary charge on the US Department of the Treasury.
Fast & Furious = Shut down 2nd Amendment
Muslim Rage = Shut down 1st Amendment / Censorship of Internet content
HillBuzz, a gay conservative website says it was well known, in the State Dept. that Stevens was gay.
Is it possible that Stevens was lured to Benghazi by a lover?
Why would Stevens risk going there on 9-11? What is one of the worlds oldest motivators? Just a thought.
His political career should have ended right there - and he should have been charged.
But we don't hold demRats accountable. Case in point - John Kerry, still in uniform, secretly met with the Vietcon leaders 3 times - in Paris. That is high treason and should have put him in jail - AND legally, not eligible to run for ANY elective office, even dog catcher.
But first thing carter did as pres was see that it was all swept under the rug.
Dear God, render these enemies of this country powerless.
Why do you think he fought so hard to, against all security rules, keep his blackberry!
I wish someone could get hold of that and look at what's in it -
Yes I have been told that, I was told most of our recent soldier deaths were killed by the very Afghans that are supposed to be on OUR side, some in training and some full fledged "trusted" Afghan military. This is sure glossed over by the MSM, like many other things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.