Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garjog

At some point you need to tell the truth.

You just repeated your falsehood again, we all know that “health of mother” means abortion on demand, and that is Mitt’s position, it is not what you claimed.

Mitt now claims that he openly campaigned on being against the party platform, being pro-abortion for “health”, “rape”, and “incest”, and that the republicans voted for him knowing that position.

You guys have backed a monster of epic proportions.


25 posted on 09/16/2012 6:15:19 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

“we all know that “health of mother” means abortion on demand”

You know I had thought he was for rape incest exception only — even after reading his statement. Health means anything since it is defined by the abortionist and includes “mental health.”

I had assumed that Romney would take the exception position like Dole, Bush and McCain did. Now he adds health, which basically means any reason.

Wow. I stand corrected. Dang. We are stuck with a candidate who is weak on pro-life issue.


32 posted on 09/16/2012 7:20:58 PM PDT by garjog (We do not want another four more years of the last four years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

Hey ansell. Why do you think that National Right to Life endorsed Romney? That is why I was calling him pro-life. I know RTL leaders in my state that supported Romney in the primary, even after I questioned them about this. They said they were convinced that he was sincerely against abortion now and that he stood the best chance to win.

If he is now taking the “health of the mother” position — code for any reason — that is serious.

I had thought he was for rape, incest exceptions only.

Did NRTL know Romney was for “health of the mother” when they made the endorsement in April?

“It is now time for pro-life Americans to unite behind Mitt Romney. For the sake of unborn children, the disabled, and the elderly, we must win.”

Mitt Romney has taken a strong pro-life position and is committed to implementing policies to protect the unborn, the medically dependent and disabled, and the elderly. Romney opposes abortion and has called the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, “a big mistake.” Romney has expressed his support of the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for abortion.”


38 posted on 09/16/2012 7:41:25 PM PDT by garjog (We do not want another four more years of the last four years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson