Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Needs a Turnaround Artist [NRO: "Romney campaign has failed to make the case..."]
National Review ^ | 09/18/2012 | Mona Charen

Posted on 09/18/2012 1:26:50 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

One of Romney’s great skills is the ability to turn around failing enterprises. He did it with private firms while he ran Bain Capital, he did it for an indebted Massachusetts, and he did it for the Olympics. He needs to do it for his campaign now.

Neil Newhouse, Romney’s pollster, attempted to soothe worried Republicans last week by stressing that the race remains extremely close. But the fact that Romney’s pollster isn’t worried is itself worrying. By rights, Romney should be ten points ahead. His campaign seems to think the bad economy will automatically win this race for the Republican.

It isn’t as if voters are unaware that the economy stinks. Yet the morning after the Democratic convention, the dismal jobs report did not prevent Democrats from getting a bigger bounce than Republicans had received. Reflect that three and a half years of miserably high unemployment, slow growth, increasing poverty, falling labor-force participation, record-setting food-stamp dependence, and an average 5 percent decline in household income has not persuaded most voters to support Mitt Romney.

On the contrary, the Gallup job-approval rating for Obama topped 50 percent after the jobs report for the first time since 2010. Job approval tends to be a good predictor of an incumbent’s share of the vote. By contrast, George H. W. Bush, the last incumbent to lose reelection, stood at 39 percent approval at this stage in 1992. And Bush’s economy wasn’t nearly as dismal.

The Romney campaign has failed to make the case that Obama is responsible for the economy, whereas Clinton/Obama have made a spurious but perhaps effective argument that Republicans got us “into this mess” and will pursue policies that will be no better and may be worse. The Democrats argue that Republicans want only to help their rich friends, not the middle class.

Romney needs an aggressive and bold response. After shooting down the lie that he and Ryan plan to increase taxes, he might begin by explaining how the 2008 financial crisis came about — namely that both parties, but mostly the Democrats, insisted that banks give mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them. As Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute has noted, 74 percent of the bad loans were on the books of Fannie, Freddie and other quasi-government entities. When the crash came, it nearly sank our entire banking system. Voters may believe that Republicans favor the rich. But they also believe that Democrats are the party of giveaways. It was the Democrats’ insistence on forcing private banks to make unsound loans that led to collapse.

Second, though Obama ridicules tax cuts, they have been responsible for bursts of economic growth every time they’ve been enacted. They worked for Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, and, yes, even for George W. Bush. The economy created 8 million jobs under Bush, and the unemployment rate averaged 5.3 percent. By contrast, there is no example of a nation or a state spending itself into prosperity. If that were possible, Greece would be lending Germany money, California would be in the black, and Illinois would be a jobs hub.

Third, the signature policies of the Obama term, Obamacare and Dodd-Frank, combined with uncertainty about what Washington will do, are crushing the private sector. The Economist has dubbed the 2,300-page financial-regulation behemoth “Dodd-Frankenstein” because it vests so much unreviewable authority in bureaucrats and drowns financial and other institutions in red tape. “Only 93 of the 400 rule-making requirements” had been completed as of February of this year, the magazine noted, two years after the bill’s passage.

After Obama signed the Affordable Care Act, private-sector job creation, which had been growing, slumped. A Chamber of Commerce survey found that 73 percent of employers cited Obamacare as an obstacle to hiring new workers. Not only does the law impose billions in new taxes and mandates, but, like Dodd-Frank, it vests so much authority in the federal bureaucracy that employers have no idea what to expect and cannot plan. Even if an employer were able to wade through the bill’s 2,700 pages, he would still emerge confused as to what the law demands. Obamacare creates 159 new agencies, bureaus, and boards, and has generated 12,000 pages of regulations — so far. It does include new hiring though — thousands of new IRS employees.

Obama is failing because his policies are wrongheaded and destructive. Uncertainty has kept capital on the sidelines. Obama has frozen employers into a defensive crouch. That is the case Romney has not yet made.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2012; mittromney; monacharen; nationalreview; romneyjihadisattack; underthebus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last
National Review has endorsed Mitt Romney for the office of the presidency... not once, but TWICE.

Mona Charen has personally endorsed Mitt Romney for the office of the presidency.

Team Romney supporters angrily denouncing either NR, Charen or (most likely scenario) both as "Obama-loving, leftwing media shills" in 5... 4... 3... 2...

1 posted on 09/18/2012 1:26:57 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

...if you listened to Rush yesterday you would know what this is about.....*smiles*


2 posted on 09/18/2012 1:32:50 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

The people he most needs to convince are the ones least likely to believe any change in his statements is sincere at this point. He has quite a challenge, of his own making, ahead of him.


3 posted on 09/18/2012 1:39:48 AM PDT by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Who does he make the case to the MSM who just lies
and twists his words. The media doesnt even follow him they will just black him out. I did not read the article
because what is the point. I will be voting for Romney anyway. Why did Mona and National Review endorse him for
in the first place they must have known what he was like
he is not a cheater like Obama who lies at the drop of the hat or Biden who is also a liar and Clinton well he is a liar too.
4 posted on 09/18/2012 1:40:43 AM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Who does he make the case to the MSM who just lies
and twists his words. The media doesnt even follow him they will just black him out. I did not read the article
because what is the point. I will be voting for Romney anyway. Why did Mona and National Review endorse him for
in the first place they must have known what he was like
he is not a cheater like Obama who lies at the drop of the hat or Biden who is also a liar and Clinton well he is a liar too.
5 posted on 09/18/2012 1:41:37 AM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

On the other hand, through his deeds, Obama has made his case very clear.


6 posted on 09/18/2012 1:44:06 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Romney needs to show that he has a plan for recovery and that he intends to end Obamacare.

More doom and gloomers.

7 posted on 09/18/2012 1:47:37 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

He doesn’t need to make the case - THE CASE IS OBAMA.


8 posted on 09/18/2012 1:58:33 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
All of this is pretty much irrelevant IMHO.

My impression is that the vast majority of voters have long since made up their minds that they are going to either vote for Obama or vote against Obama with not enough undecided voters in between to make a difference the outcome of the election

Very few are going to change their minds at this point and a lot people are lying to pollsters, including me, for very good reason - fear of payback.

In a world where gangs of feral Obama flash mob zombies gather at the touch of the buttons of their government supplied and paid for Obama phones to intimidate those who dare displease Obama or his associates , no way am I going to diss THE ONE over the phone to some stranger calling out of the blue who knows my phone number for certain, and can easily know where I live and work.

Who knows, it could be ACORN or the IRS on the other side of the line and the New Left that has taken over the Democrat party lives to reward their friends and punish their enemies.

Unlike most Republicans, they take names, never forget, never forgive and they are obsessed with hurting and getting even with those who simply disagree with them on even minor issues.

9 posted on 09/18/2012 1:59:29 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

the case seems pretty clear to me.


10 posted on 09/18/2012 2:11:32 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

o and his mites have already punished this country in ways large and small and too numerous to mention. IF we lose this fight, America as we have known it will cease to exist and we will have no one but ourselves to blame.


11 posted on 09/18/2012 2:16:01 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RC one

So why does NRO blame Romney for not making the case? Why don’t they HELP make the case instead of whining about it?


12 posted on 09/18/2012 2:18:46 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

because their minds are weak and the force is not with them?


13 posted on 09/18/2012 2:23:31 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Bfl


14 posted on 09/18/2012 2:23:52 AM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
the case seems pretty clear to me.

Me to - Romney has shot himself to h_ll right now and possibly lost the little Latino base that he had.

Who is running in 2016?
15 posted on 09/18/2012 2:43:17 AM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

What ‘Moana’ needs to do is stop worshiping manipulated polls.


16 posted on 09/18/2012 2:51:50 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

This argument was made in 2008 and was shown not to be the case.

Does the media lie? Absolutely.

How much did they lie back in 2008? 2 points.

Take two points off his margins here - where do you end up?

Romney’s not in great shape.


17 posted on 09/18/2012 2:53:48 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DJlaysitup
Who is running in 2016?

If the CINO GOP-e has their way -- i.e., if conservatives don't do everything humanly possible at the state level, between now and then, to close every last state primary to the GOP-e's beloved, sabotaging "moderates" and other assorted liberals -- then some combination of any/all of the following, guaranteed:

Jeb Bush

Chris Christie

Scott Brown (provided he wins re-election this year, himself)

Jon Huntsman

Lisa Murkowski

Bet the rent on it. They are easily as stupidly, suicidally self-destructive as all of that.

18 posted on 09/18/2012 2:54:43 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
"IF we lose this fight, America as we have known it will cease to exist and we will have no one but ourselves to blame."

I agree.
The fact that ZERO has any support at all is scary. If the fraud ZERO wins I don't have the funds to tuck tail and run to another country. Even if I had the funds I don't want to. I want BO to leave not me.
Mitt does have a history of turning things around when it looks bleak. GO MITT GO GET ER DID. . . . . .

19 posted on 09/18/2012 2:57:25 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Mitt: Please look at what Mclaim did and don't repeat his mistakes. Our future is at stake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
So why does NRO blame Romney for not making the case?

Because he's the frickin' candidate -- having spent the last six years of his adult life demanding to be promoted to that position -- and (being the candidate) it's actually Romney's responsibility to convincingly make said case to a majority of the voting electorate, with or without the National Review... who, having already fully and unhesitatingly endorsed him twice, successively, might legitimately be said to have contributed more than a little something already, thanks awfully.

If Romney's supporters are now (belatedly) advancing the argument that he's too weak and inept a candidate to advance such an argument while standing on his own two hind legs, without someone (or multiple someones) holding his hand, in the process: gee, thanks for keeping that handy little informational tidbit safely hidden beneath your hats until just now, guys. I certainly don't recall anyone offering to share that particular morsel while simultaneously chanting the talismanic magic word "E!L!E!C!T!A!B!L!E!" monotonously throughout the length of the primary season.

Seriously. That one falls squarely under the category of "Essential Pre-Primary Information," right there.

20 posted on 09/18/2012 3:09:03 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Who is going to be the candidate in 2016 or 2020 (depending if Romney wins). Well let’s see. Nobody on Free Republic liked Romney at all until he became the Savior to fickle Romney people. So it would not surprise me if the Republican party nominates Mayor Bloomberg as our next nominee and watch the FREEPERS get all supportive of him like they did Romney who “supposedly” they couldn’t stand just a short few months ago. Some have ZERO principles at all.


21 posted on 09/18/2012 3:23:39 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Paul Ryan/Rick Santorum 2012....That would be the best scenario ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: MrDem; Jim Robinson
Obama rooting a*

You know where to send any/all evidence in support of that claim, son.

Whenever you've got the time.

23 posted on 09/18/2012 3:33:20 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I would fully agree with you except for one small but important point. The msm will not cover him and when they do, it’s the most negative coverage they can come up with. Our so-called Conservative media aids and abets them by blaming Romney for not getting his message out, but do THEY cover his positives? There aren’t that many, I grant you, but the ones there are have been buried under a mountain of rino tears and fears,
He was not my choice, but he is all that stands between us and perdition.


24 posted on 09/18/2012 3:37:24 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You’ll note Jim Robinson (who you always call like some little girl calling her mommy - ‘Joey stuck his tongue at me’) stopped bashing Romney once it was clear that it was either support him or have the country destroyed by an Obama second term. But you appear to be TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THAT!


25 posted on 09/18/2012 3:39:17 AM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

NRO stinks since the boss man died...I use to get it via supscription, ended when they started writting loosely left of center....I also don’t like little metrosexual boys dressed in a man’s suit....


26 posted on 09/18/2012 3:40:53 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
but do THEY cover [Romney's] positives?

Serious question: have you actually read an issue of NR during the last four years...? ;)

27 posted on 09/18/2012 3:40:53 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrDem
Here on Free Republic, it's standard operating procedure to PING another FReeper whenever referencing them. But you already knew this, of course.

You're just having a nice, noisy, public sulk, is all.

Bless your heart.

28 posted on 09/18/2012 3:43:39 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
If Romney loses, I think the post-mortem will be that Romney didn't have the political skills to win the presidency, due to his inexperience in politics. He overpowered his GOP opponents in 2012 because (1) he spent more money than all the other candidates combined, thanks to business sector support and (2) he had one liberal opponent who dropped out early, whereas the conservatives stayed in till the end. If the trailing conservatives had made a pact to pull out a little earlier, there would have been a united front against Romney. I almost want to say that if there's a place for campaign finance limits through Federal funding, it's in the GOP nominating process, so that guys like Romney can't simply pummel his opponents into submission with unlimited amounts of money.

Look - I don't blame the losing conservatives for sticking it out until the last minute - many gave a year or more of their lives seeking the nomination. At the same time, I think the most experienced politicians are also the ones with the best political instincts, in the sense that they have a better feel* of what wins votes and what doesn't. Romney's single term as MA governor is nowhere near enough political experience to give him an understanding of how to win elections.

Even Obama had more political experience than Romney when he ran for the presidency. Despite being an arriviste from Hawaii who parachuted into Chicago politics, he managed to win an Illinois State Senate position against authentically black race hustlers, and then won a Democratic Senate primary against significant Democratic opposition, thereby catapulting him into federal office. All told, he spent 12 years in politics before running for the presidency. But in a sense, he's been running for the presidency all his life, with his book-length musings on the strategic and tactical aspects of getting political power. Bottom line is that Obama has sunk 20-30 years of his life figuring the practical ins and outs of winning elections. Romney has 4. In retrospect, it's not entirely surprising that he steamrolled Hillary Clinton *and* John McCain.

* The reason I use the word "feel" is because vote-winning strategies change. Goldwater's use of defense issues failed miserably, even though Kennedy's myth-making about the "missile gap" worked for him.

29 posted on 09/18/2012 3:45:22 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Aren’t we talking about now? Because NOW they suck lemons and spit seeds.


30 posted on 09/18/2012 3:47:04 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

It’s conservatives who keep committing suicide by failing to coalesce behind one candidate. Unless, as I suspect, there’s no such thing as ‘conservative’ as a block, neither is ‘RINO’ block. The winner just smarter, more resourceful, and know how to build a winning coalition.


31 posted on 09/18/2012 3:47:08 AM PDT by paudio (Post-racial society: When we can legitimately hire and fire a Black man without feeling guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Aren’t we talking about now? Because NOW they suck lemons and spit seeds.

Again: the current editorial regime has fully and publicly endorsed Romney not once, but TWICE, in succession; and has spent the past. four. years. lauding him as the GOP's electoral savior-to-be, come 2012.

If all of that isn't enough... then: nothing ever will (or could) be.

32 posted on 09/18/2012 3:51:53 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: paudio
It’s conservatives who keep committing suicide by failing to coalesce behind one candidate.

Primaries wide (and disastrously) open to any and all "moderates," CINOs and other dishonestly labeled liberals -- thereby diluting virtually all significant conservative influence -- absolutely a steady, sludgy stream of McCain-esque losers, every four years.

33 posted on 09/18/2012 3:56:45 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"absolutely guarantees," that should have read.
34 posted on 09/18/2012 3:58:14 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Then answer me. HOW is he supposed to get a message out when the media blocks and bars him at every turn with negative coverage, even resorting to outright lies, let alone making lies up out of whole cloth as hairy reid did about his not paying taxes for ten years?


35 posted on 09/18/2012 3:58:50 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: paudio
It’s conservatives who keep committing suicide by failing to coalesce behind one candidate. Unless, as I suspect, there’s no such thing as ‘conservative’ as a block, neither is ‘RINO’ block. The winner just smarter, more resourceful, and know how to build a winning coalition.

Romney's primary victory wasn't inevitable. Edwards and Obama split the liberal vote against Clinton. Obama political instincts were simply superior to Clinton's. And far superior to Romney's. Within the Democratic nomination process in 2008, Obama's situation was similar to Gingrich's and Santorum's, in these sense that the liberal vote was split between him and Edwards, whereas Clinton was the sole credible moderate. But Obama defeated the other liberals and the sole credible moderate. Much as it pains me to say it, Obama was more focused and disciplined and focused than either Gingrich and Santorum, and that was what won it for him.

36 posted on 09/18/2012 4:01:06 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Then answer me. HOW is he supposed to get a message out

GWB -- certainly no Demosthenes-level elocutionist, God wot -- somehow managed to do so, twice, against what was (by any sane and rational accounting) an even more unrelentingly hostile and unreasoning media assault.

The question you obviously ought to be asking, at this juncture, is: how come the (purportedly) more intelligent and verbally adept Romney canNOT...?

37 posted on 09/18/2012 4:05:31 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
.

Last week Myth Romney said that he wants to KEEP parts of Obama-Care ... I mean, "Romney-Obama Care" ...

Looks like that "Severely Conservative" thingee mojo snake-oil spell is wearing off ...




.
38 posted on 09/18/2012 4:09:02 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Kent, you’ve been so far off on this it’s barely worth the comment, nd that’s too bad because usually you are sensible. Charen has been undercutting Romney for weeks.


39 posted on 09/18/2012 4:15:50 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

AMEN


40 posted on 09/18/2012 4:16:53 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LS
Charen has been undercutting Romney for weeks.

So, just to review, then: publicly and enthusiastically ENDORSING Romney for the presidency -- while (simultaneously) literally festooning NR and NRO's "The Corner" with pro-Romney puffery, over several years -- counts for zero, zip, nyet, nada, and didn't/doesn't help even one minuscule, microscopic bit...

... but, one or two pieces stating (as this one plainly does; read it) "Romney should be doing far, FAR better than he is right now, given Obama's record over the past four years" is somehow -- and I don't even pretend to follow the argument, mind -- "undercutting" Romney, and does materially affect his electoral chances.

Is that about the size and shape of things, here...? ;)

41 posted on 09/18/2012 4:25:47 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

NRO = beltway prima donnas (with a very few exceptions).

The first debate will make or break Romney - it will be his one chance to bypass the media filter.

He should have chosen Condi Rice for VP to put the media in disarray for a precious few days that might have let him break out of the pre-defined narrative. Even then, even if he could put the opponent’s secondary in disarray, I wonder if he’d have a play to call.


42 posted on 09/18/2012 4:30:37 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum
He should have chosen Condi Rice for VP to put the media in disarray for a precious few days that might have let him break out of the pre-defined narrative.

He absolutely should have tapped a woman for the slot, agreed... although I would have steered clear of Rice, myself. (Too easy to play the "Here Comes Four More Years of GWB" card against her, sadly.)

I seem to recall reading someplace (Hot Air, perhaps?) that Nikki Haley was being vetted by the Romney campaign, at one point. That might well have ended up being my choice, all things being equal.

43 posted on 09/18/2012 4:34:51 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
READ IT: anyone doing anything that advances Obama to a second term in word or deed is, in my view, no better that the Taliban. This is not childish little "he's not conservative enough" crap. This is not "Romney should be up 30" crap.

This is th survival of the Republic. So pick up a gun and help fight or run to your purity foxhole and freakin' pontificate while the rest of us sav the country.

44 posted on 09/18/2012 4:39:41 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
READ IT: anyone doing anything that advances Obama to a second term in word or deed is, in my view, no better that the Taliban. This is not childish little "he's not conservative enough" crap. This is not "Romney should be up 30" crap.

This is th survival of the Republic. So pick up a gun and help fight or run to your purity foxhole and freakin' pontificate while the rest of us save the country.

45 posted on 09/18/2012 4:39:58 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LS
anyone doing anything that advances Obama to a second term in word or deed is, in my view, no better that the Taliban.

... and Charen (and National Review) are doing what, SPECIFICALLY to "advance Obama to a second term," again? Spell it out, please; details, rather than rhetoric.

I note, with genuine disappointment, that my simple, straightforward query, re: #41, has unaccountably gone a-begging. Ah, well.

46 posted on 09/18/2012 4:44:57 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Here are the facts: Barack Obama is NOT winning any group he lost in 2008, nor is he doing better with any group he won, not Jewish voters not Blacks not Hispanics not Young voters not women. At the very least Republican enthusiasm is 5 points above Democrat enthusiasm. Republican registration is at its all time high and Democrat registration is less than one point above its lowest point in history. Obama’s Catholic support is 27% which is half of what he got in 2008. His Jewish support is 59%.
NO DEMOCRAT has ever won a presidential race while losing the Catholic vote or getting less than 68% of the Jewish vote.

Charen is doing the Left’s bidding with crap like this.

47 posted on 09/18/2012 5:03:49 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Charen is doing the Left’s bidding with crap like this.

AFTER endorsing him for the presidency.

And AFTER publicly lauding Romney, two or three times weekly (at barest minimum), over the past several years on NRO. (They do have a perfectly good Search function over there, you know.)

And she's suddenly doing this, in your estimation... ummmmmmmm... why -- ?!? ;)

48 posted on 09/18/2012 5:11:43 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
From Mitt-boosting Ace of Spades, only just yesterday (and highly relevant, re: all the increasingly pouty foot-stamping and tantruming and whatnot, both on this thread and elsewhere on FR):

"One of the things that's truly annoying about political movements is the large number of people who don't really have particularly interesting minds, and don't write particularly interesting things. So they appoint themselves to a position long held by uninteresting people: Morale Officer. And, like Morale Officers throughout time (the US had them in military; the Soviet Union had them for civilians) they don't actually do much to improve Morale; they just insist it should be better, and if you are not Regulation Cheerful, you are a Malcontent and must be Disciplined."

Fewer sullen, spittling, self-appointed Morale Officers, hereabouts.

That would make for a considerable improvement, in all naked candor. ;)

49 posted on 09/18/2012 5:12:30 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

FU Romney and the gutless NR, I voted for ABMR in the primary and got the feckless MR anyway. Bye, bye Republican eunuchs!


50 posted on 09/18/2012 5:27:44 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson