Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette

That’s what I though. So why is the story written as if it was expected that Martin’s DNA would be on the gun. There is no reason that it should have been.

In hindsight, Zimmerman should have rubbed the gun handle in Trayvon’s hand I guess. If only he would have known that he was going to be railroaded.


9 posted on 09/19/2012 8:50:50 AM PDT by KansasGirl ("If you have a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."--B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: KansasGirl

this story says only ON THE GRIP. So why the selective testing? The fact they do not test on the rest of the gun is suspect. If the gun was tested w/o the defense expert present there is a surpression and spoiliation of evidence supression motion(s) inevitable.


18 posted on 09/19/2012 8:59:28 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KansasGirl; txrangerette
I just went back and watched part of the interrogation video of Zimmerman. He claims that Martin had one hand on Zimmerman's nose and one on his mouth when Zimmerman shifted, exposing his gun as the jacket and shirt moved up on Zimmerman's right hip.

Per Zimmerman (and he re-enacts it), Martin slid his hand down Zimmerman's side, Zimmerman pinned it again Zimmerman's side with his elbow/upper arm. Zimmerman drew the gun and shot Martin.

Under the scenario he describes and demonstrates, Martin's DNA should not have been on the grip of Zimmerman's handgun.

You can watch the video here

21 posted on 09/19/2012 9:01:20 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson