Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air pollution chief rejects calls to change California's new greenhouse gas program
Sacramento Bee ^ | 9/20/12 | Dale Kasler

Posted on 09/20/2012 12:45:26 PM PDT by SmithL

California's top air pollution regulator issued a spirited defense today of the state's new cap-and-trade greenhouse gas market, rejecting pleas from businesses to make significant changes to the program.

Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board, said the carbon market is designed to minimize the impact on businesses.

Big business groups, like the California Chamber of Commerce, were scheduled to testify later today about their objections to the cap and trade market, the centerpiece of the state's global warming law, AB 32.

Businesses say the market amounts to a $1 billion-plus annual tax that will destroy jobs and drive manufacturers, food processors and others out of the state.

The Air Resources Board wasn't expected to take any action today. But Nichols delivered a stinging critique of the business groups' protests, saying it's time for them to "join us to help us make this work."

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: capandtrade; globalwarminghoax; goldenstate; taxandspend

1 posted on 09/20/2012 12:45:32 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They might as well have a market where businesses trade magic beans from Jack’s beanstalk. Utter fiction and madness.


2 posted on 09/20/2012 12:58:29 PM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Cap and Trade was an Enron idea.

They were the smartest guys in the room and wanted to trade web band and weather futures.

ISUN. Look it up.


3 posted on 09/20/2012 1:04:41 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why would ANY business set up in, or choose long-term to REMAIN in, California, unless by the business’s very nature it HAS to be there? (E.g., to sell fresh donuts in CA, you must be located there. Not so for making microchips.)


4 posted on 09/20/2012 1:15:19 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board, said the carbon market is designed to minimize the impact on businesses.

California: it's not a state of mind - it's a mental state.

5 posted on 09/20/2012 1:55:16 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
 
 
This is a case of Follow The Money.
 
 

6 posted on 09/20/2012 2:00:07 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson