The Obama States of Amerika (Welcome to Obama's Communism)

In what is far creepier than even the Obama logo that came out in 2008, the Obama campaign released their version of the American flag. They are actually selling this propaganda (reminiscent of Communist and Fascist eras gone by) on their campaign site. Obama has been the most divisive president in modern history. He has divided this country by class, gender, race, religion and everything in between. Obama’s version of America is far different than what the Founding Fathers intended and far, far different than what the majority of Americans want. As noted by a commenter on Twitchy's blog about this flag, it is the 'Obama States of Amerika'.

You are entitled to free food, housing, health care and a college education. The middle class and those above will be forced to pay for this even though they were personally responsible and grabbed ahold of the limitless opportunities afforded them by the United States of America.

If you disagree with Obama’s vision for a European-style socialistic America, you are a racist.

If you dare tell the truth about Obama’s failed presidency: •More people in poverty than in years; •More people on food stamps than ever; •More people on welfare than ever; •More people out of the workforce than in history

Saw on local news last night that couple of cases (TX, VA) where people had hung a chair on the front of a house with an ‘anti-Obama’ sign.
I didn’t ‘catch’ whether the chair was put there by the homeowner or on a BO supporters house??
“They” didn’t show the sign but did show a picture of the chair hanging with an American flag (maybe that is the Anti Obama?) attached to it.
Now in the days of ‘reporting news’, that, plus ‘maybe an interview’, would have been that....
Last night, the reader (middle age W/F) went on as to how a chair hanging like that was close enough to bring back memories of lynching????

Now, maybe to someone like Bill Clinton who remembers nightly night riders and lynchings(??) and scores of burnt out churches would take it that way, I even think it is probably in poor taste, but certainly not a ‘hate crime’ etc....

Is this the first POTUS to actively associate himself with a logo? I’m used to campaigns having a consistent theme/format to their posters, using the candidates name but not use of a logo.

Obviously Barry is the yahoo that wants to ‘fundamentally transform’ our country so perhaps associating himself with a different symbol or even a whacked out blasphemy of our flag is more than marketing but a somewhat subliminal message that he doesn’t intend (never intended) to embrace America but rather reboot it into his leftarded vision.

It seems to me that a sitting POTUS would want to be surrounded by symbols of our great country that he is proud of. Our flag, our monuments, etc. - the trademarks of what DOESN’T need to be fundamentally transformed.

far different than what the majority of Americans want.

I find it hard to believe that it is not what most Americans want, unless you are being very choosy who you refer to as Americans and actually i look at it the same way.

At the same time it must be what the majority of the voters wanted or Obama would not be president.

If the American people ( using that American people lightly )voted in a president that they believed to be a true American then it would just show the stupidity of the American people.

But i don,t think people could possibly be that stupid.

I left school when i got through the seventh grade at 15 years old, and even though i went to several different schools i don,t ever remember having an inside rest room or running water.

But since then education has been the number one issue, the kids and teachers have been given every thing in the world for the purpose of an education and every one regardless of their status are sending their kids to college.

In my opinion that is part of the problem, but it seems that most people disagree with me on that subject as kids are going to school at i think 4 years old.

Yet this nation has from the time of modern school houses to now only enjoyed about 60 years of real prosperity which we are now losing and that prosperity never had anything to do with the schooling because the people who brought it was not the ones going to school.

We can blame it on the illegal aliens or what ever but the people we now have in government are the ones the tax payers have spent so much money on sending them to school.

I really believe that most people are not stupid in the secular sense but spiritually stupid and that is why this nation is going toward socialism.

The points i am trying to make are two things, first, people sends their kids to school so early that they do not have any time to teach them any thing at all, the teachers can not possibly teach them every thing, as the kids grow they are not required to do anything except go to school.

The modern welfare system takes away any incentive for them to work so for the ones who keep going to school there are no practical experience at all and these are the ones who become politicians or preachers, lawyers, etc.

People used to use the phrase investing in their kids education, yeah right but it don,t turn out that way, what happens is that most or at least many of them jump on to the socialist band wagon and get in positions of power or spend their life trying.

I don,t like the people in Washington or in most state governments but it is the peoples fault, we would not hire a fox to guard our hen house unless we just wanted to get rid of the chickens and hold our selves blameless, we hired them to protect the chickens.

And we do the same thing when voting, people will vote to get a government hand out to take away their own responsibility but pretend that there was another reason they vote the way they do.

Good bye America.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

вперед