Skip to comments.The Sexual Pathology of the Libyan Attackers
Posted on 09/21/2012 5:35:44 AM PDT by SJackson
- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -
The Sexual Pathology of the Libyan Attackers
Posted By Mark Tapson On September 21, 2012 @ 12:50 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 3 Comments
Soon after the terrorist attack that left four Americans dead in Libya, reports began coming in that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens was not only murdered by the Muslim mob, but also sodomized both before and after his death, and his corpse dragged through the streets. This grotesque defilement was willfully suppressed by the mainstream media, who were focused like a laser on a much more horrific story: presidential candidate Mitt Romney talking like a conservative at a fundraiser. Thank goodness that in these difficult times we can count on the media to cover the news we really need to know.
As FrontPage Shillman Journalism Fellow Raymond Ibrahim writes,
Sexual abuse and degradation is a common tactic used against non-Muslims, especially women, as the repeatedly raped Lara Logan found Nor are men immune from such rapes. In fact, the photos of Ambassador Stevensstripped of clothes, bloodied and tortured right before he was killedvery much resemble the photos of Gaddafi right before he was killed. One U.S.-supported freedom-fighter, for example, can be seen sodomizing Gadaffi with a rod as others dragged him along.
Ibrahim finishes by noting that the al-Qaeda affiliated men who sexually abused and killed Gaddafi are the same men who sexually abused and killed Americas ambassador.
This revelation about the sexual denigration of the reportedly gay Ambassador Stevens raises several questions. First, when are so-called liberals going to shed the rose-tinted goggles of multiculturalism and get in touch with a righteous anger about a pathologically anti-gay, ragingly misogynist, mob culture that sexually violates and murders innocents?
When are American progressives, who whine about a mythical Republican War on Women, going to denounce this perverse sexual pathology in Arab culture? When are leftist academics, up in arms about the Bush administrations enhanced interrogations of hardened terrorists, going to vent their fury against a culture that routinely commits sexual torture and mutilation?
Gay rights supporters work themselves into a lather over the Chick-Fil-A restaurant chain, which discriminates against neither gay employees nor gay customers. I suppose theyre unaware that most Arab and African nations walked out of an historic UN Human Rights Council debate on gay rights earlier this year, refusing to legitimize homosexuality. When are the liberals going to break their monastic silence about a theocratic culture that hangs gays from cranes, as in Iran, where President Ahmadinejad famously claimed they dont have the problem of homosexuality there?
Obviously these are all rhetorical questions designed to underscore the lefts disgusting hypocrisy, because the answer to all of them is never. Breaking free of the mental bondage of multiculturalist indoctrination would cause the entire world view of leftists to come crashing down. They must cling to their delusion or risk a complete psychological meltdown.
Another question: If suspicions of Ambassador Stevens homosexuality are true, why did the administration send a gay man to an unstable hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism? Did it not realize that the possible discovery of his sexual orientation could have ramped up the danger for Stevens? Kevin Dujan at Hillbuzz reports that a Serbian consulate employee named Dino
told me it was no secret that Chris Stevens was gay and that it was stupid to send him to Libya as the ambassador when he was a known homosexual.
Dino explained in great detail that the brutal sodomizing of Stevens corpse was something that Muslims do to show the utmost disrespect to the body and that this is a great insult in Islam reserved for homosexuals. It is like making him a woman in death and he will be a woman now after life, the Serbian explained to me.
Women should find it pretty offensive that this process of degrading a corpse through rape is considered making him a woman in death and a woman after life. Why arent feminists taking to the streets to condemn this misogynist barbarism? Oh, I forgot theyre busy picketing Washington for free birth control, costumed as vaginas.
The American left, forever screaming about gay marriage, demanding free birth control, and spewing hate at conservative Christians whom they disparage as the American Taliban, is shamefully silent about real evil in the world, about the most intolerant ideology on the planet and one that stands in stark contrast to the tolerance they claim to revere.
A final question: President Obama proudly announced, almost three and a half years into his tenure, that he had evolved far enough to support gay marriage; when can we expect him to evolve enough to express outrage not just a composed, rote condemnation of violence at a culture that condemns homosexuals to a grisly death?
Some might argue that, to avoid igniting the Middle East tinderbox, the President should stay calm and not inflame matters more. Screw that. Islamic fundamentalists have dragged an American ambassadors mutilated body through the streets, killed three more Americans, and stormed our embassies in other countries as well. Its long past time for the President of the United States of America to present a righteous fury to the Islamic enemy, show them not one whit of deference or appeasement, and move to protect American interests and avenge American murders.
But that wont happen, because we have a President whose sympathies lie with the Muslim fundamentalists seeking to tear down America and the West. Because of that he will excuse their torture and killing of homosexuals, their insanely hateful oppression of women, their violent disrespect toward our embassies, and their murder of Americans. We have a President who is busy yukking it up with David Letterman, partying with former drug dealer Jay-Z at a fundraiser, and basking in the adoration of the hosts on The View to give a damn about American lives or American interests.
Ambassador Stevens was not sexually abused AT ALL. This story has been repeated so many times that it sounds credible. It is not.
The man is dead. I’m asking everyone to act civilly and leave the dead and the Stevens family alone.
We have enough information about the islamist trash that want us all dead.
How do you know? Are you some kind of gov intel insider or something?
I read a lot but stay away from broadcast media, my background is military intelligence and State Dept.
There is quite a layer of reports from analysts and intel harvesters that ends up on private blogs and forums, where members share what they know but avoid the “if it bleeds, it leads” media. That is how international intel and security analysts commune about our foreign affairs that affect them. They offer unique and first hand perspective to our foreign interests and events.
Start digging, nearly all foreign intelligence services and military have private blogs and forums that you can join, and use google translate. Lots of hard work but it will put you in the know.
I often offer much less than I know. I was just disgusted with this line of posts and finally said something.
FR is a great forum but it is getting so overloaded with sensational nonsense, repeat posts of the same story.