Skip to comments.Lawsuit filed to remove Obama from Mississippi ballot
Posted on 09/24/2012 5:33:57 PM PDT by Elderberry
JACKSON, MS (WLBT) -
California lawyer Orley Taitz has brought her national campaign to disqualify President Barack Obama in the November election to Mississippi.
Monday, Taitz was in U.S. District Court in Jackson for a hearing before Judge Henry Wingate.
Taitz claims Obama should be disqualified because his birth certificate is a fake, and he is using a fake Social Security Number.
The hearing included a teleconference with attorneys representing the Democratic Party, who filed a motion to dismiss the suit.
Judge Wingate gave Taitz three weeks to serve President Obama, Representative Nancy Pelosi and three Hawaiian officials.
The judge will set a hearing at a later date and allow Taitz to serve President Obama with papers to get him to respond to the suit.
Taitz has filed suits against the President in multiple states, but so far, no judge has heard her case.
Waste of time. 0bama is not going to win Mississippi anyway. Take him off the ballot in a blue state (if you can).
You might not want to waste your time responding to sarcasm.
If it does not happen as you state, then We the People need to push until it does happen.
...hauling in the new catch.
Very happy my state is getting in on the action.
I am as avid an anti Obama person as there is. However, talk of sheriff Joe being able to anything at an inaugural is no way a reality. First of all he is out of his bailiwick in Arizona and secondly there would be a host of SS men guarding the imposter. It is the gutless congressmen and judges that need to show a recognition of 50% of the people.
Not to nit pick, but since when does an Arizona county sheriff’s jurisdiction stretch all the way across the country to Washington D.C.
Now don’t get me wrong, there was plenty wrong with what you said, I just picked the most egregious error.
I’ve been saying it for weeks, but I’ll say it again. More and more posts are sounding like Jr. High fantasies than anything resembling solid legal or political thought.
Thanks for the Ping. FRmail on its way to you.
Stamp on upper left says Feb 19 2009.
Wonder when the guy that got hold of it originally got it (can’t remember his name)
On the fourth document, the one with the footprint.
It looks like Orly has discovery. All that is needed is effective discovery.
Lets see the 2 paper copies that Obama got last year, and the microfiche and bound copy in HI.
Icing on the cake: deposition of Pelosi about what she used to certify Obama, and why she signed 2 papers for certification of Obama for the ballot in HI (one with and one without an eligibility clause).
And few years from now, somebody from Hawaii will spill the beans. They will get a check for 10 or 20 grand to tell the story.
We know, through your efforts and others, much of the details. He was not born at that hospital. No father was listed. Frank Davis is his father. Only the Obamas know where he was born.
We have the most powerful government in the world being run by a man who could not legally acquire a passport or drivers license, who dodged the selective service and defrauded Social Security and every citizen with his forged documents
And right now he have a picture developing in slow motion before us. Every state SOS at this point knows that they have been given a fraudulent and perjurious Certificate of Nomination. The HDOH itself has told us this. And each SOS has to decide whether they are going to align their actions with the legal truth and the law, or with a media-created alternate reality.
What’s that show where they stage and record situations in order to see how people will respond? If this wasn’t so deadly serious it would be hilarious to watch. Every state SOS has been set up in a live-on-camera scenario where the audience knows that the SOS knows they are being given perjurious documents. And we’re all watching to see what they will do. Will they smooth things over like the actors in the scenario - who act like everything is fine or that they don’t know what’s going on - or will they do the right thing?
Large portions of the voting public are stupid and/or misinformed. But these are supposedly the cream of the crop, and they have specifically been notified of the truth by an attorney in a certified-mail letter. If we have this level of lawlessness within our own government, on open, proud display for all the world to see... then turn out the lights, the party’s over. No nation can survive that level of corruption and lawlessness.
-——they have been given a fraudulent and perjurious Certificate of Nomination-——
Please show us how this statement is true?
Please provide the certification of nomination document and show precisely how it is fraudulent and perjurious.
Having seen the certificates of nomination issued in ‘08 I know they were neither.
Hawaii doesn’t have to honor the subpoenas issued through court action in another state.
And they won’t.
That’s why Obama won’t submit any document. Once a document is submitted, the original HAS to be made available for inspection to the opposing party; the submission into court records is permission for that to happen.
Unless that happens, Hawaii can reject any subpoena from another state.
And we’ve all seen how even CONGRESS is able to get federal government workers to submit to subpoenas. (Eric Holder...) cough.
This issue is not going to be settled by civil courts. They have all been corrupted. This issue is going to be settled by SOS’s who know they will be hauled off to CRIMINAL court if they themselves commit election fraud by accepting a known-perjurious Certification of Nomination and allowing it to be used to get Obama’s name on the ballot.
And they’re not even going to consider criminal charges a possibility unless somebody in the major media (e.g. Associated Press) gets real and reports the true legal facts to a duped public. And until we let them know that we are informed and watching.
That’s a tall order. Please pray and work with me to see this done.
Better yet. Larry Klayman will show you how it is true. You can see the letter that he sent to DNC Counsel Bob Bauer, the DNC Executive Committee, the Commission on Presidential Debates, every state democratic party chair, every state Secretary of State, and every state Attorney General, at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf
To understand why both the Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee’s verification and KS SOS Kris Kobach’s verification are legally worthless, read http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/wheel-of-fortune-v-family-feud-final.pdf
And realize that even the lawyers for the Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee understood Onaka’s verification to AZ SOS Bennett as being a confirmation of a non-valid BC for Obama - because their request was designed to work perfectly fine for a NON-VALID BC. And they were sure to say in their legal filing when they presented their verification that they only meant BIRTH FACTS when they said “information” (not processing facts such as the validity of the record).
Also bear in mind that Onaka sees a distinction between saying information is “identical to” and saying that information “matches”. We know this because KS SOS Kris Kobach asked Onaka to verify that the information contained in the WH image “is identical to” the information contained in the original record, and Onaka WOULD NOT verify that. Instead he illegally verified something he was not asked to verify: that the information MATCHED.
The difference? If something “matches”, it means that where there is an entry in the WH image, there is the same entry on the original. If the records are “identical to”, then even the LACK OF AN ENTRY has to be the same for both documents. They have to be identical even when the field is left blank.
The White House image leaves item 23 blank (Evidence for Delayed Filing or Alteration). There’s nothing on the WH BC to try to “match” so that field doesn’t get compared to the original. But in order for the WH information for item 23 to be IDENTICAL, it has to be blank on the original if it’s blank on the WH image.
And that’s where Onaka balked. He would not verify that the information is IDENTICAL. He will only say that it “matches” (that is, that where something is actually listed on the WH image, the same thing is listed on the original).
“Hawaii doesnt have to honor the subpoenas issued through court action in another state.” - BD
I thought they (HI) did have to comply. (if there was a valid legal interest - or some such)
In the ballot case in GA was HI subpoenaed for original/full records?
If so, by whom?
What was the reply?