For those outside of MA, the major media is not covering Fauxahontas faux heritage, or yesterdays revelation that she doesnt possess a MA law license, despite the fact that she has acted as a lawyer since the mid 80s.
And to his credit, Scott Brown brought a lot of stuff up in the debate that the media was purposely ignoring: her fake heritage, her salary, her work for Travelers Insurance.
In the next debate, he should raise the question that she was practicing law without a license. Let her spin her wheels trying to explain that one.
posted on 09/25/2012 10:33:33 AM PDT
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
He did a great job. I thought it was no contest.
She’s really going to be paddling upstream without a paddle this time.
Do you think that voters care about ethics and integrity? They want results, meaning personal wealth at all costs, regardless of how it is accumulated.
Look at the polls. Guess what’s under 50%. The Constitution. The Declaration of Independence. Religious liberty and freedom of conscience. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The right to eat what you want.
Guess what’s over 50%. Free birth control.
posted on 09/26/2012 3:29:34 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson