Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia suspends import and use of American GM corn after study revealed cancer risk
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | September 25, 2012 | Sean Poulter

Posted on 09/26/2012 8:16:04 AM PDT by opentalk

Russia has suspended the import and use of an American GM corn following a study suggesting a link to breast cancer and organ damage.

Separately, the European Food Safety Authority(EFSA), has ordered its own review in to the research, which was conducted at a French university. The decision by Russia could be followed by other nations in what would be a severe blow to the take-up of the controversial technology.

Historically, biotech companies have proved the safety of GM crops based on trials involving feeding rats for a period of 90 days. However, experts at the University of Caen conducted an experiment running for the full lives of rats -two years.

The findings, which were peer reviewed by independent experts before being published in a respected scientific journal, found raised levels of breast cancer, liver and kidney damage.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: cancer; fda; foodsupply; gmcorn; gmmaize; gmo; kidneydisease; monsanto; roundup

1 posted on 09/26/2012 8:16:09 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Yes everything cause cancer we know.

I wonder if we have less cancer now that fewer Americans are smoking?


2 posted on 09/26/2012 8:21:14 AM PDT by Baseballguy (If we knew what we know now in Oct would we do anything different?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Remember the silicone breast implants cause cancer scam? When such claims are made, always ask who is making money off the claim.

As for the rest of the world, let ‘em eat each other. Our grain keeps many from starving.

If the Commies like Russia and China don’t want to buy our grain,and try to play with the debt crisis, we should remind them that only weak nations HAVE to pay up on demand.


3 posted on 09/26/2012 8:25:04 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I had no idea General Motors was growing corn.


4 posted on 09/26/2012 8:28:57 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Remember the silicone breast implants cause cancer scam? When such claims are made, always ask who is making money off the claim.

Yep. Remember what happened to Saccharin? Alar? How coffee has been declared alternately unhealthy and healthy? Wine? AGW?

BTW, My gut tells me that these countries are using this useless study as leverage in negotiations over prices.

5 posted on 09/26/2012 8:40:21 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Whatever a homosexual union might be or represent, it is not physically marital. - F.Cardinal George)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

Fine, let the world starve some more. Really, is that what they are saying? Oh well, more for ethanol. LOL


6 posted on 09/26/2012 8:40:42 AM PDT by 1scrappymom (No, I am not a Republican. I am a CONSERVATIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Good! Maybe that will drive the price of corn down which will keep livestock producers in business. Maybe it will bring the price of that engine destroying ethanol down that will bring the price of gas down. Maybe shipping fees can be reduced thus making it easier for small retailers to make a profit.


7 posted on 09/26/2012 8:51:54 AM PDT by cork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

companies have proved the safety of GM crops based on trials involving feeding rats for a period of *90 days*,

Pure science NOT.


8 posted on 09/26/2012 9:03:55 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1scrappymom
Agree as this could actually benefit the US due to our recent drought. Putting the “questionable” corn into ethanol production while we carry out studies leaves more corn for food and cattle feed. Bad part is that there will be damage to exports, but internal gain would hopefully be better.

I question most of these studies. Worked with a bunch of old WWII veterans who smoked heavily until their dying day, none of cancer and all of advanced age (80’s). As one (MD) put it, we all have cells that may or may not be programed for cancer. If you've got them, something will eventually trigger them. Hence the hereditary factor of illnesses. I'm sure there are other cause/effect scenarios but feel the majority fall within hereditary predisposition. Stating that genetic engineering of foods, especially without the addition of known cancer causing agents, causes cancer is pretty hard for me to accept without a substantial number of independent and long term studies. End result for some of the world may be to eat and have a minor risk of getting cancer or starve and certainly die. World population is close to exceeding the ability of land available to grow crops as we know them. Options are to increase crop yields or reduce the population.

9 posted on 09/26/2012 9:04:43 AM PDT by Boomer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
It is more likely that the excessive use of vodka by the average inbred Russian is to blame for the rates of cancer Heart disease and early deaths in that retrograde society of infantile misfits!
10 posted on 09/26/2012 9:07:15 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Posted this at the DM online, but I’ve never seen one of my non-leftie comments see the light of day on that website.


Folks should keep in mind that, even if this study proves to be true, removing GM products poses a real clear and present danger.

Global grain/cereal production would be reduced by more than half. As a result, millions of people in the third world would die of hunger and hunger-related ailments. 10s or 100s of millions more would go to bed hungry and not get enough to eat.

We’d also have to start spraying our crops with more dangerous herbicides, pesticides, fungicides, etc, because GM crops were made to be resistant to weeds, pests, fungi, etc. Runoff of these chemicals into streams and drinking water would do far more damage to humans and animals where the food is grown.

You can wring your hands about what might happen if you eat GM foods. However, we KNOW for a fact what would happen in this world without them. Unfortunately, most people making the decisions about this stuff live in the West, where we can handle a 400% increase in food prices. The world’s poor can’t.


11 posted on 09/26/2012 9:17:30 AM PDT by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risen_feenix

risen_feenix~ “ Folks should keep in mind that, even if this study proves to be true, removing GM products poses a real clear and present danger. “

At least in the European Union , Genetically Modified foods have to be labeled as such.
Not so in this country.
The key question is : “ How much to you trust Monsanto ?”

I recall that the German engineers who created margarine (then made from Coal tar ?) refused to eat the stuff .

Personally , given the exclusivity of the Monsanto brand on herbicide / insecticide resistant crops suggests to me that the god almighty profit exceeds the need for “safe food” .
Monsanto now owns the seed , the insecticide , and the herbicide in “no-till farming” . I question their priorities.
Better to use the Geneticaly Modified crops for ethanol production .
This is not the first study to indicate possible long-term effects of G M foods ; its just the first long-term test that went out over 2 years , and can be verified.
Increased cancer rates, still-births , under-weight births, and sterility of off-spring were noted even in the previous short term studies.

Personally , I want GM foods and additives to be labeled.
I value health and safety over profit !


12 posted on 09/26/2012 10:36:56 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Disclaimer - the opinions above merely reflect the writers restricted ability to observe reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

I almost hate to ask, but where did you come up with the idea that Monsanto has a monopoly on herbicides and insecticides used in no-till farming?


13 posted on 09/26/2012 10:46:03 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: risen_feenix

risen_feenix~ “ You can wring your hands about what might happen if you eat GM foods. However, we KNOW for a fact what would happen in this world without them. Unfortunately, most people making the decisions about this stuff live in the West, where we can handle a 400% increase in food prices. The world’s poor can’t.

I don’t want to be the one who asks the worlds poor whether they want to die this year from malnutrition , or die in 5 years from cancer

Agenda 21 calls for control of food production and population control .
Monsanto owns the patent for the seed , the herbicide , and the insecticide . Monsanto has a vested financial interest in the sale and distribution of these products.
Given the results of this long-term test , it can best be accomplished through the use of G M Foods !


14 posted on 09/26/2012 10:46:50 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Disclaimer - the opinions above merely reflect the writers restricted ability to observe reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Fine, the Russians prefer possible starvation this year to possible cancer decades from now. We all have choices to make and will eventually die from something.


15 posted on 09/26/2012 11:14:59 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Related thread

Monsanto Roundup weedkiller and GM maize implicated in ‘shocking’ new cancer study

16 posted on 09/26/2012 11:31:34 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

It would be easier to paint Monsanto as a boogyman if it weren’t for the fact that its patent on Round-up expired several years ago and if it weren’t for Bayer, Dow and Dupont, all of who compete in the agricultural chemical market and all of who are several times larger than Monsanto.


17 posted on 09/26/2012 1:23:22 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Mr. Lucky~ “ It would be easier to paint Monsanto as a boogyman if it weren’t for the fact that its patent on Round-up expired several years ago “

Right !.. but Monsanto owns certain patent rights to Geneticly Modified crops .
I am unfamiliar whether or not Bayer , Dow , or Dupont are involved in G M foods , which is on what the long-term testing is being done .


18 posted on 09/26/2012 2:38:49 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Disclaimer - the opinions above merely reflect the writers restricted ability to observe reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Lots of companies hold lots of plant patents. I would guess that there are well over 100 active patents on corn alone.


19 posted on 09/26/2012 2:55:20 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Mr. Lucky~” Lots of companies hold lots of plant patents. I would guess that there are well over 100 active patents on corn alone. “

Right ~ there are a lot of “intellectual property” seeds , or proprietary seed market , or what we commonly call: Geneticly Modified (G.M.)seed crops.

The largest GM / intellectual property seed sales are :
#1 Monsanto(US) at 23 % ,
#2 DuPont(US) at 15% ,
#3 Syngenta(Swiss) at 9%,
#7 Bayer Crop (Ger.)at 2%. , etc.

The proprietary seed market accounts for approximately 82 % of the commercial seed market worldwide .
According to these statistics , the US portion of proprietary seed is approximately or over 38% .


20 posted on 09/26/2012 3:25:21 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Disclaimer - the opinions above merely reflect the writers restricted ability to observe reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

A 23% market share is something less than a monopoly.


21 posted on 09/27/2012 8:41:04 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson